Revised Perceived Locus of Causality in Physical Education Scale: Traducción, adaptación transcultural, validez psicométrica y concordancia de formatos impreso y online para uso en escolares brasileños (Revised Perceived Locus of Causality in Physical Education Scale: Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, psychometric validity and agreement of printed and online formats for use in Brazilian schoolchildren)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v56.103616Palabras clave:
Motivación, Autodeterminación, Educación Física, Alumno, Escala de medición, PsicometríaResumen
La Revised Perceived Locus of Causality in Physical Education Scale (PLOC-R) es una escala propuesta a la luz de la Teoría de la Autodeterminación para analizar las regulaciones motivacionales de los estudiantes en las clases de educación física de educación básica. Objetivo: traducir y adaptar transculturalmente, hacer disponible formato online, identificar y comparar propiedades psicométricas de los formatos impreso y online, y verificar la capacidad de concordancia entre los datos recopilados por ambos formatos de la PLOC-R. Métodos: La versión original fue traducida y adaptada de acuerdo con las recomendaciones internacionales. El formato online de la escala se creó mediante un programa web y se alojó en un website específico. Para identificar propiedades psicométricas y la capacidad de concordancia entre los datos recolectados por ambos formatos se seleccionó una muestra de estudiantes con edades entre 12 y 18 años, de ambos sexos, de escuelas públicas y privadas de la ciudad de Londrina, Paraná. Resultados: Después de ligeras modificaciones observadas en el proceso de traducción, un comité de expertos consideró que la versión traducida de la PLOC-R presentaba equivalencias semánticas, idiomáticas, culturales y conceptuales. La validez de constructo se confirmó a través de cinco subescalas propuestas originalmente. El modelo teórico encontrado cumplió con los criterios propuestos para ambos formatos. Las cargas factoriales oscilaron entre 0,71 y 0,86 y el alfa de Cronbach entre 0,71 y 0,87. La replicación de la PLOC-R formateada en modelos impresos y online mostró una alta concordancia (Kappa ≥ 0,70 e ICC ≥ 0,76). Conclusión: La PLOC-R traducida y adaptada en el estudio actual para su uso en formato impreso y online logró un rendimiento psicométrico similar. Además, con base en los grados de concordancia observados, se concluye que, en general, los datos recolectados a través de formatos impresos y online son comparables, lo que viabiliza sus aplicaciones en futuros estudios en Brasil.
Palabras clave: Motivación; Autodeterminación; Educación Física; Alumno; Escala de medición; Psicometría.
Citas
Alfonsson, S., Maathz, P. & Hursti, T. (2014). Interformat reliability of digital psychiatric self-report questionnaires: a systematic review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 16(12), e268. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.3395.
ABEP – Associação Brasileira de Empresa de Pesquisa. (2021). Critério de Classificação Econômica Brasil. São Paulo: Associação Brasileira de Empresas de Pesquisa.
Assor, A., Vansteenkiste, M. & Kaplan, A. (2009). Identified versus introjected approach and introjected avoidance motivations in school and in sports: The limited benefits of self-worth strivings. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(2), 482-497. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014236.
Ball, H. L. (2019). About research: conducting online surveys. Journal of Human Lactation, 35(3), 413-417. https://doi.org/10.1177/0890334419848734.
Booth-Kewley, S., Gerald, E., Larson, G. E. & Miyoshi, D. K. (2007). Social desirability effects on computerized and paper-and-pencil questionnaires. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(1), 463-477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2004.10.020.
Braekman, E., Berete, F., Charafeddline, R., Demarest, S., Drieskens, S., Gisle, L., et al. 2018). Measurement agreement of the self-administered questionnaire of the Belgian Health Interview Survey: paper-and-pencil versus web-based mode. PLoS One, 3(5), e0197434. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197434.
Brooke, J. (1996). SUS-A quick and dirty usability scale. In: Jordan, W. P., Thomas, B., Weerdmeester, B., McClelland, I. L (Eds). Usability Evaluation in Industry. London, United Kingdom: Taylor & Francis, p. 189-194.
Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Cádiz-Chacón, P., Barrio-Mateu, L. A., León-Valladares, D., Hernández-Sánchez, A., Milla-Palma, M., & Sotomayor-Fernández, M. (2021). Motivación contextual desde la autodeterminación en las clases de Educación Física (Contextual motivation from self-determination in physical education classes). Retos, 41, 88-94. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v0i41.80998.
Costa, F. F., Schmoelz, C. P., Davies, V. F., Di Pietro, P. F., Kupek; E. & Assis, M. A. (2013). Assessment of diet and physical activity of Brazilian schoolchildren: usability testing of a web-based questionnaire. JMIR Research Protocols, 2(2), e31. https://doi.org/10.2196/resprot.2646.
Ferriz, R., Gonzalez-Cutre, D. & Sicilia, A. (2015). Revision of the Perceived Locus of Causality Scale (PLOC) to include the Measure of Integrated Regulation in Physical Education. Revista de Psicología del Deporte, 24(2), 329-338.
Goudas, M., Biddle, S. J. H. & Fox, K. (1994). Perceived locus of causality, goal orientations and perceived competence in school physical education classes. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 64, 453-463. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1994.tb01116.x.
Guedes, D. P., Bernardes, A. G. & Yamaji, B. H. S. (2020). PLOC - Regulações motivacionais para aulas de educação física: validação psicométrica para uso em escolares brasileiros (PLOC - Motivational regulations in physical education classes: psychometric validation for use in Brazilian school students). Revista Brasileira de Educação Física e Esporte, 34(1), 19-31. https://doi.org/10.11606/1807-5509202000010019.
Hambleton, R. K. (2005). Issues, Design and Technical Guidelines for Adapting Tests into Multiple Languages and Cultures. In: Hambleton, R. K., Merenda, P. F. & Spielberger, C. D. (Eds.). Adapting Psychological and Educational Tests for Cross-Cultural Assessment. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, p. 3-38.
Higuera-Gomez, A., Ribot-Rodriguez, R., San-Cristobal, R., Martín-Hernández, R., Mico, V., Espinosa-Salinas, I., et al. (2022). HRQoL and nutritional well-being dissimilarities between two different online collection methods: Value for digital health implementation. Digital Health, 8,20552076221138316. https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076221138316.
Hu, L. & Bentler, P. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
Hutmacher, D., Eckelt, M., Bund, A. & Steffgen, G. (2021). Lifting the curtain on motivation in exercise: validation of two questionnaires for physical education and leisure-time in French and German. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 39(5), 623-639. https://doi.org/10.1177/07342829211005571.
Jankauskiene, R., Urmanavivius, D. & Baceviciene, M. (2022). Associations between perceived teacher autonomy support, self-determined motivation, physical activity habits and non-participation in physical education in a sample of Lithuanian adolescents. Behavioral Sciences. 12(9), 314. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs12090314.
Landis, J. R. & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159-174.
Lefever, S., Dal, M. & Matthíasdóttir, Á. (2007). Online data collection in academic research: advantages and limitations. British Journal of Educational Technology. 38,574-582. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2006.00638.x.
Loer, A. K. M., Domanska, O. M., Kuhnert, R., Houben, R., Albrecht, S. & Jordan, S. (2020). Online Survey for the Assessment of Generic Health Literacy among Adolescents in Germany (GeKoJu): Study Protocol. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(5), 1518. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17051518.
Lonsdale, C., Sabiston, C., Taylor, I., Ntoumanis, N. (2011). Measuring student motivation for physical education: Examining the psychometric properties of the Perceived Locus of Causality Questionnaire and the Situational Motivation Scale. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 12(3), 284-292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2010.11.003.
Markopoulos, P. & Bekker, M. (2003). On the assessment of usability testing methods for children. Interacting with Computers, 15(2), 227-243. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0953-5438(03)00009-2.
Murcia, J. A. M., Coll, D. G. C. & Garzon, M. C. (2009). Preliminary validation in Spanish of scale designed to measure motivation in physical educational classes: The Perceived Locus of Causality (PLOC) Scale. Spanish Journal of Psychology, 12(1), 327-337. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1138741600001724
Murillo, M., Bel, J., Pérez, J., Corripio, R., Carreras, G., Herrero, X., et al. (2017). Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and its associated factors in children with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). BMC Pediatric, 17(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-017-0788-x.
North, A. & Noyes, J. (2002). Gender influences on children's computer attitudes and cognitions. Computers in Human Behavior. 18(2), 135-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0747-5632(01)00043-7.
Owen, K. B., Smith, J., Lubans, D. R., Ng, J. Y. Y. & Lonsdale, C. (2014). Self-determined motivation and physical activity in children and adolescents: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Preventive Medicine, 69, 270-279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.07.033.
Pelletier, L. G. & Sarrazin, P. (2007). Measurement issues in self-determination theory and sport. In: Haggery, M. S., Chatzisarantis, N. L. D. (Eds.). Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Exercise and Sport. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, p. 143-152.
Rajmil L., Robles, N., Rodriguez-Arjona, D., Azuara, M., Codina, F., Raat, H., et al. (2014). Comparison of the web-based and digital questionnaires of the Spanish and Catalan versions of the KIDSCREEN-52. PLoS One, 9(12), e114527. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0114527.
Ramsey, S.R., Thompson, K. L. & McKenzie, M. (2016). Psychological research in the internet age: The quality of web-based data. Computers in Human Behavior, 58, 354-360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.12.049
Revilla, M. & Ochoa, C. (2017). Ideal and maximum length for a web survey. International Journal of Market Research, 59(5), 557-565. https://doi.org/10.2501/IJMR-2017-039.
Romero-Chouza, O., Lago-Ballesteros, J., Toja-Reboredo, B., & González-Valeiro, M. (2021). Propósitos de la Educación Física en Educación Secundaria: revisión bibliográfica (Purposes of Physical Education in Secondary Education: a bibliographic review). Retos, 40, 305-316. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v1i40.80843.
Rubin, J., Chisnell, D. & Spool, J. M. (2008). Handbook of Usability Testing How to Plan, Design, and Conduct Effective Tests. 2nd Edition. Indianapolis, IN: Wiley, Publishing Inc.
Ryan, R. M. & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860.
Ryan, R. M. & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination Theory: Basic Psychological Needs in Motivation, Development and Wellness. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Salazar-Ayala, C. M., & Gastélum-Cuadras, G. (2020). Teoría de la autodeterminación en el contexto de educación física: Una revisión sistemática (Self-determination Theory in the Physical Education context: A systematic review). Retos, 38, 838-844. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v38i38.72729.
Shapka, J. D., Domene, J. F. & KHAN, S. (2016). Online versus in-person interviews with adolescents: An exploration of data equivalence. Computers in Human Behavior, 58, 361-367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.01.016.
Shashaani, L. (1993). Gender-based differences in attitudes toward computers. Computer & Education, 20(2), 169-181. https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-1315(93)90085-W.
Sheldon, K. M., Osin, E. N., Gordeeva, T. O., Suchkov, D. D. & Sychev, O. A. (2017). Evaluating the dimensionality of self-determination theory’s relative autonomy continuum. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43(9), 1215-1238. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167217711915.
Shrout, P. E. & Fleiss, J. L. (1979). Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86(2), 420-428. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.86.2.420.
Standage, M. & Ryan, R. M. (2020). Self-Determination Theory in Sport and Exercise. In: Tennenbaum, G. & Eklund, R. (Eds.). Handbook of Sport Psychology. 4th Edition. New York: John Wiley Sons. p. 37-56.
Sun, H. & Chen, A. (2010). An examination of sixth graders’ self-determined motivation and learning physical education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 29, 262-277.
Taylor, I. M. & Ntoumanis, N. (2007). Teacher motivational strategies and student self-determination in physical education. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(4), 747-760. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.4.747.
Teixeira, D. S., Monteiro, D., Carraça, E. & Palmeira, A. L. (2018). Translation and validation of the Perceived Locus of Causality Questionnaire (PLOCQ) in a sample of Portuguese physical education students. Motriz: Journal of Physical Education. 24, e1018162. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1980-6574201800020007.
Touvier, M., Méjean, C., Kesse-Guyot, E., Pollet, C., Malon, A., Castetbon, K., et al. (2010). Comparison between web based and paper versions of a self-administered anthropometric questionnaire. European Journal of Epidemiology, 25(5), 287-296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-010-9433-9.
Trigueros, S., Sicilia, A., Alcaraz-Ibañez, M. & Dumitru, D. C. (2017). Spanish adaptation and validation of the Revised Perceived Locus of Causality Scale (PLOC-R) in physical education. Cuadernos de Psicología del Deporte, 17(1), 25-32.
Vallerand, R. J. & Rousseau, F. L. (2001). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in sport and exercise: a review using the hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. In: Singer, R., N., Hausenblasy, H., A. & Janelle, C. M. (Eds.). Handbook of Sport Psychology. 2nd Edition. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons, p. 389-416.
Van Gelder, M. M., Bretveld, R. W., Roeleveld, N. (2010). Web-based questionnaires: the future in epidemiology? American Journal of Epidemiology, 172(11), 1292-1298. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwq291.
Velikova, G., Wright, E. P., Smith, A. B., Cull, A., Gould, A., Forman, D., et al. (1999). Automated collection of quality-of-life data: a comparison of paper and computer touch-screen questionnaires. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 17(3), 998-1007. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.1999.17.3.998.
Vereecken, C., Covents M., Maes, L. & Moyson, T. (2014). Formative evaluation of the dietary assessment component of Children's and Adolescents' Nutrition Assessment and Advice on the Web (CANAA-W). Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics, 27(Suppl 1), 54-65. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-277X.2012.01290.x.
Vlachopoulos, S. P., Katartzi, E. S., Kontou, M. G., Moustaka, F. C. & Goudas, M. (2011). The Revised Perceived Locus Causality in Physical Education Scale: psychometric evaluation among youth. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 12(6), 583-592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2011.07.003.
Wang, C. K. J. & Biddle, S. J. H. (2001). Young people’s motivational profiles in physical activity: a cluster analysis. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 23(1), 1-22.
Wang, C. K. J., Hagger, M. & Liu, W. C. (2009). A Cross-cultural validation of Perceived Locus of Causality Scale in physical education context. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 80(2), 313-325. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2009.10599566.
Ward, P., Clark, T., Zabriskie, R. & Morris, T. (2014). Paper/pencil versus online data collection. Journal of Leisure Research, 46(1), 84-105. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.2014.11950314.
White, R. L., Bennie, A., Vasconcellos, D., Cinelli, R., Hilland, T., Owen, K. B., et al. (2021). Self-determination theory in physical education: a systematic review of qualitative studies. Teaching and Teacher Education, 99, 103247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103247.
Whitley, B. E. (1997). Gender differences in computer-related attitudes and behavior: a meta-analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 13(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0747-5632(96)00026-X.
Wong, I. L. K. (2010). Internet gambling: A school-based survey among Macau students. Social Behavior and Personality, 38(3), 365-372. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2010.38.3.365.
Yang, M., Viladrich, C. & Cruz, J. (2019). Measuring motivation in physical education among Chinese and Spanish adolescents: comparing the psychometric properties of perceived locus of causality scale. Journal of Sport Psychology, 28(2), 87-96.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2024 Retos
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
Los autores que publican en esta revista están de acuerdo con los siguientes términos:
- Los autores conservan los derechos de autor y garantizan a la revista el derecho de ser la primera publicación de su obra, el cuál estará simultáneamente sujeto a la licencia de reconocimiento de Creative Commons que permite a terceros compartir la obra siempre que se indique su autor y su primera publicación esta revista.
- Los autores pueden establecer por separado acuerdos adicionales para la distribución no exclusiva de la versión de la obra publicada en la revista (por ejemplo, situarlo en un repositorio institucional o publicarlo en un libro), con un reconocimiento de su publicación inicial en esta revista.
- Se permite y se anima a los autores a difundir sus trabajos electrónicamente (por ejemplo, en repositorios institucionales o en su propio sitio web) antes y durante el proceso de envío, ya que puede dar lugar a intercambios productivos, así como a una citación más temprana y mayor de los trabajos publicados (Véase The Effect of Open Access) (en inglés).
Esta revista sigue la "open access policy" de BOAI (1), apoyando los derechos de los usuarios a "leer, descargar, copiar, distribuir, imprimir, buscar o enlazar los textos completos de los artículos".
(1) http://legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/boaifaq.htm#openaccess
