Facilitators in the implantation of telemedicine services. Perspective of professionals involved in its design and implementation

Authors

  • F. Roig Loscertales
  • F. Saigí Rubió

Keywords:

Tecnología de la información. Telemedicina. Sistema de salud. Cambio organizacional.

Abstract

Background. Given the difficulties encountered by Telemedicine for final incorporation into clinical practice and given the lack of scientific evidence regarding the most appropriate implementation strategies, it is necessary to collect and disseminate lessons gained from experience in its introduction and diffusion in our health system. The aim of this study is to identify the facilitators perceived by professionals who actively participate in the design and implementation of telemedicine projects in the health care system. Methods. Qualitative study of data from semi-structured interviews with 17 key informants belonging to different Catalan health organizations Results. The identified facilitators are grouped in four broad areas: a TM service that meets a need clearly perceived by practitioners; a core leadership with a clinical profile, managing an open, participatory and flexible model that takes into account the needs of professionals; the ability to establish partnerships with different stakeholders beyond the customer-supplier relationship; and the inclusion in the initial design of a strategy for sustainability and normalization. Conclusions. Understanding the facilitators and barriers that appear in the process of implementing TM experiences in health care organizations becomes an item of high value for its final introduction. An approach combining the evidence on clinical effectiveness and cost-benefit with lessons learned about the dynamics of implementation and normalization will allow for a holistic understanding of the adoption of the TM and provide guidance for improving its organizational management.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. COIERA E. Four rules for the reinvention of health care. Br Med J 2004; 328: 1197-1199.

https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.328.7449.1197

2. BASHSHUR RL, REARDON TG, SHANNON GW. Telemedicine: A new health care delivery system. Annu Rev Public Health 2000; 21: 613-637.

https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.publhealth.21.1.613

3. FINCH T, MAY C, MAIR F, MORT M, GASK L. Integrating service development with evaluation in telehealthcare: an ethnographic study. Br Med J 2003; 327: 1205-1209.

https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7425.1205

4. ROIG F, SAIGÍ F. Dificultades para la incorporar la telemedicina en las organizaciones sanitarias: perspectivas analíticas. Gac Sanit 2009; 23: 147.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaceta.2008.05.009

5. OBSTFELDER A, ENGESETH KH, WYNN R. Characteristics of succesfully implemented telemedical applications. Implement Sci 2007; 2: 25.

https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-2-25

6. NICOLINI D. The work to make telemedicine work: A social and articulative view. Soc Sci Med 2006; 62: 2754-2767.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.11.001

7. LEROUGE C, TULU B, FORDUCEY P. The Business of Telemedicine: strategy primer. Telemed J e-Health 2010; 16: 898-908.

https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2009.0178

8. ROIG F, SAIGÍ F. Barreras para la normalización de la Telemedicina en un sistema de salud basado en la concertación de servicios. Un estudio cualitativo. [En prensa] Gac Sanit.

9. MARCH JC, PRIETO MA, HERNÁN M, SOLAS O. Técnicas cualitativas para la investigación en salud pública y gestión de servicios de salud: algo más que otro tipo de técnicas. Gac Sanit 1999; 13: 312-319.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0213-9111(99)71373-7

10. HUBERMAN AM, MILES MB. Métodos para el manejo y el análisis de datos. En: Denman CA, Haro JA editores. Por los rincones. Antología de métodos cualitativos en la investigación social. Hermosillo, México: El Colegio de Sonora 2000; 253-300.

11. CHUGANI V, MARTÍN RL, SOTO E, YANES V, SERRANO P. Implantación de programas de telemedicina en la sanidad pública de España: experiencia desde la perspectiva de clínicos y decisores. Gac Sanit 2009; 23: 223-229.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaceta.2008.06.005

12. GAGNON MP, DUPLANTIE J, FORTIN JP, LANDRY R. Implementing telehealth to support medical practice in rural/remote regions: what are the conditions for success? Implement Sc 2006; 24: 1-18.

https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-1-18

13. LAM DM, MACKENZIE C. Human and organizational factors affecting telemedicine utilization within U.S. military forces in Europe. Telemed J e-Health 2005; 11: 70-78.

https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2005.11.70

14. WHITTEN P, ALLEN A. Analysis of Telemedicine from an organizacional perspective. Telemed J 1995; 1: 203-213.

https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.1.1995.1.203

Published

2011-09-05

How to Cite

1.
Roig Loscertales F, Saigí Rubió F. Facilitators in the implantation of telemedicine services. Perspective of professionals involved in its design and implementation. An Sist Sanit Navar [Internet]. 2011 Sep. 5 [cited 2026 Jan. 24];34(2):235-44. Available from: https://recyt.fecyt.es/index.php/ASSN/article/view/12103

Issue

Section

Research articles

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.