Magnitud del efecto para la diferencia de dos grupos en ciencias de la salud

1. LÓPEZ CORTÉS R, MARÍN FERNÁNDEZ B, HUESO MONTORO C, ESCALADA HERNÁNDEZ P, SANZ AZNAREZ A C, RODRÍGUEZ GUTIÉRREZ C. Calidad de vida relacionada con la salud en pacientes con enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal. An Sist Sanit Navar 2016; 39: 123-131.

2. DOMÍNGUEZ S. Diferencias entre grupos y magnitud del efecto: un análisis complementario. Arch Argent Pediatr 2016; 114: e300-e301.

3. FERGUSON CJ. An effect size primer: a guide for clinicians and researchers. Prof Psychol Res Pr 2009; 40: 532-538.

https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015808

4. SULLIVAN G, FEINN R. Using effect size - or why the p value is not enough. J Grad Med Educ 2012; 4:279-282.

https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-12-00156.1

5. COHEN, J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. (2ª ed.). Erlbaum, Hillsdale; 1998.

6. GRISSOM R, KIM J. Effect sizes for research. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, editor. Mahwah, New Yersey; 2005.

7. RUSCIO J, MULLEN T. Confidence intervals for the probability of superiority effect size measure and the area under a receiver operating characteristic curve. Multivariate Behavioral Res 2012; 47: 201-223.

https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2012.658329

8. ERCEG-HURN D, MIROSEVICH V. Modern robust statistical methods: An easy way to maximize the accuracy and power of your research. Am Psychol 2008; 63: 591-601.

https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.63.7.591

9. DOMÍNGUEZ-LARA S. Comparación del autoconcepto entre grupos, ¿sesgo o diferencias?: comentarios a Castillo et al. Rev Chil Pediatr 2016. Disponible en http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037041061630002X

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rchipe.2016.03.003

10. DRASGOW F. Biased test items and differential validity. Psychol Bull 1982; 92: 526-531.

https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.92.2.526