Confianza y cooperación: la socialdemocracia europea y la Primera Guerra Mundial.
Abstract
En 1914, los partidos socialistas votaron a favor de los créditos de guerra. Esta decisión fue inesperada, dados sus compromisos con el mantenimiento de la paz. Esta decisión se ha explicado normalmente recurriendo a las preferencias nacionalistas de los líderes socialistas. En este trabajo, se propone una hipótesis alternativa. Se emplea un modelo de teoría de juegos para explicar por qué los partidos socialistas traicionaron sus compromisos anteriores a la guerra. Se sostiene que la decisión de votar a favor de los créditos de guerra era compatible con unas preferencias pacifistas. El modelo de teoría de juegos muestra que los partidos socialistas se enfrentaron a un problema de coordinación que no pudieron superar debido a falta de confianza en las preferencias pacifistas del otro partido.Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors whose contributions are accepted for publication in this journal, accept the following terms:
a. The authors retain their copyright and guarantee to the magazine the right of first publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution License Attribution-Noncommercial-No derivative works 4.0 Spain, which allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and its first publication is indicated.
b. Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements to distribute the version of the published work (e.g. deposit in an institutional repository or archive, or published in a monographic volume) provided the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
PLAGIARISM AND SCIENTIFIC FRAUD
The publication of work that infringes on intellectual property rights is the sole responsibility of the authors, including any conflicts that may occur regarding infringement of copyright. This includes, most importantly, conflicts related to the commission of plagiarism and/or scientific fraud.
Plagiarism is understood to include:
1. Presenting the work of others as your own.
2. Adopting words or ideas from other authors without due recognition.
3. Not using quotation marks or another distinctive format to distinguish literal quotations.
4. Giving incorrect information about the true source of a citation.
5. The paraphrasing of a source without mentioning the source.
6. Excessive paraphrasing, even if the source is mentioned.
Practices constituting scientific fraud are as follows:
1. Fabrication, falsification or omission of data and plagiarism.
2. Duplicate publication.
3. Conflicts of authorship.
