The Lisbon earthquake of 1755 and the policy of economic regulation of the Marquis de Pombal
Keywords:
Lisbon earthquake 1755, Portugal, Marquis de Pombal, mercantilism, enlightenment.Abstract
The article begins with a general picture of the economic consequences of the natural disaster that destroyed Lisbon in November of 1755, which serve as a point of departure for the study of the role played by the Marquis of Pombal — leading minister of King José I — in the process of reconstruction. The article argues that the substantial amount of material damage was an opportunity and a pretext to put forward a set of economic policies guided by the mercantilist doctrine that Pombal had learned while he served as ambassador in London in the early 1740’s. The public needs following the catastrophe urged for a strong determination and requested a political leadership that Pombal was able to demonstrate. The collection of decrees, edicts and orders that he produced in the days and weeks immediately after the earthquake, offer the main historical sources for the study of Pombal’s political intervention on different problems — social, economic, military, religious, judicial — that needed to be solved. The earthquake was therefore the momentum that made it possible for Pombal to emerge as the enlightened minister responsible for the conduction of public policies designed, not only to work out immediate problems, but also to foster long term development.Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc-nd/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors whose contributions are accepted for publication in this journal, accept the following terms:
a. The authors retain their copyright and guarantee to the magazine the right of first publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution License Attribution-Noncommercial-No derivative works 4.0 Spain, which allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and its first publication is indicated.
b. Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements to distribute the version of the published work (e.g. deposit in an institutional repository or archive, or published in a monographic volume) provided the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
PLAGIARISM AND SCIENTIFIC FRAUD
The publication of work that infringes on intellectual property rights is the sole responsibility of the authors, including any conflicts that may occur regarding infringement of copyright. This includes, most importantly, conflicts related to the commission of plagiarism and/or scientific fraud.
Plagiarism is understood to include:
1. Presenting the work of others as your own.
2. Adopting words or ideas from other authors without due recognition.
3. Not using quotation marks or another distinctive format to distinguish literal quotations.
4. Giving incorrect information about the true source of a citation.
5. The paraphrasing of a source without mentioning the source.
6. Excessive paraphrasing, even if the source is mentioned.
Practices constituting scientific fraud are as follows:
1. Fabrication, falsification or omission of data and plagiarism.
2. Duplicate publication.
3. Conflicts of authorship.