Conservative and Progressive Thinking as to the (Extension Plans) for Pamplona
Keywords:
Ensanches urbanos, Pamplona, Cerdá, Diseño urbanoAbstract
The authors hold that any debate between progress and tradition fathers a balanced compromise and hold up as an example of this axiom the Second Extension Plan for Pamplona of the early 20C. to show its peculiar workings. The various parts of the project are said to evidence a play of opposing view points and, strange to say, it is the traditionalists at this period, here and elsewhere, that are most in agreement with Cerda's rationalist approach, albeit in a very rigid, over-loaded and somewhat stereotyped way whereas the advanced thinkers go rather for a wedding of functionalist and academic options. The authors add that the project also led to a debate as between 19C. ultra-liberal postures that were backed up by the Acts of 1892 and 1895 as against municipalist positions that sort to guarantee social welfare. The difficult approving of these plans, the accusations they gave rise to and a comparing of the designs urged are here used to ground the authors ' interpretation of the matter.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 1999 José María Ordeig Corsini
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc-nd/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Considering the provisions of the current legislation on Intellectual Property, and in accordance with them, all authors publishing in CyTET give -in a non-exclusive way and without time limit- to the Ministry of Transport, Mobility and Urban Agenda the rights to disseminate, reproduce, communicate and distribute in any current or future format, on paper or electronic, the original or derived version of their work under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivative 4.0 license International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), as well as to include or assign to third parties the inclusion of its content in national and international indexes, repositories and databases, with reference and recognition in any case of its authorship.
In addition, when sending the work, the author(s) declares that it is an original work in which the sources that have been used are recognized, committing to respect the scientific evidence, to no longer modify the original data and to verify or refute its hypothesis. Author(s) also declare that the essential content of the work has not been previously published nor will it be published in any other publication while it is under evaluation by CyTET; and that it has not been simultaneously sent to another journal.
Authors must sign a Transfer of Rights Form, which will be sent to them from the CyTET Secretariat once the article is accepted for publication.
With the aim of promoting the dissemination of knowledge, CyTET joins the Open Journal Access (OA) movement and delivers all of its content to various national and international indexes, repositories and databases under this protocol; therefore, the submission of a work to be published in the journal presupposes the explicit acceptance by the author of this distribution method.
Authors are encouraged to reproduce and host their work published in CyTET in institutional repositories, web pages, etc. with the intention of contributing to the improvement of the transfer of knowledge and the citation of said works.