The Impact Report about gender on the development of urban master plans
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37230/CyTET.2020.203.03Keywords:
Urban Master Plans, Gender, Jurisprudence, Supreme CourtAbstract
The problem raised about the compulsory inclusion of the Impact Report about Gender in the development of Urban Master Plans is mediated by two general issues, which should be briefly -but necessarily- referenced. The first issue directly connects with the legal nature of Urban Master Plans, which is the legal controversy arisen from the assimilation of Urban Master Plans with general provisions in legal terms. Secondly, and from a more practical perspective, it is necessary to highlight the serious problems coming from the requirement of more and more documentation in the elaboration of planning documents, also in relation to legal impugnation and cancellation.
Downloads
References
Carballeira Rivera, M.T. (2016): Urbanismo con género. El Derecho de la ciudad y el territorio. (Estudios en homenaje a Manuel Ballbé Prunés). INAP.
Del Oro Pulido, M. & Suay Rincón, J.J. (Voto particular, Sentencia de 6 de octubre de 2015. Recurso de casación 2676/2012. Tribunal Supremo).
Fuertes López, M. Sentencias que anulan planes urbanísticos, 21 de junio 2017).
Ramón Fernández, T. (2017): “El contencioso urbanístico y su necesaria reforma”. Revista de Administración Pública 203.
Ramos Medrano, J.A. (2017): Actualidad jurídica ambiental, nº 73. (20 de noviembre).
Ruiz Arnaiz, G., (2017):“El Informe de impacto de género en el planeamiento territorial y urbanístico”. El Derecho, 13 de junio.
Velasco Caballero, F., (2018):“Informe de impacto de género y planeamiento urbanístico: Cuando el TSJ de Madrid crea exigencias procedimentales” (11 de septiembre).
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 César TOLOSA-TRIBIÑO
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Considering the provisions of the current legislation on Intellectual Property, and in accordance with them, all authors publishing in CyTET give -in a non-exclusive way and without time limit- to the Ministry of Transport, Mobility and Urban Agenda the rights to disseminate, reproduce, communicate and distribute in any current or future format, on paper or electronic, the original or derived version of their work under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivative 4.0 license International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), as well as to include or assign to third parties the inclusion of its content in national and international indexes, repositories and databases, with reference and recognition in any case of its authorship.
In addition, when sending the work, the author(s) declares that it is an original work in which the sources that have been used are recognized, committing to respect the scientific evidence, to no longer modify the original data and to verify or refute its hypothesis. Author(s) also declare that the essential content of the work has not been previously published nor will it be published in any other publication while it is under evaluation by CyTET; and that it has not been simultaneously sent to another journal.
Authors must sign a Transfer of Rights Form, which will be sent to them from the CyTET Secretariat once the article is accepted for publication.
With the aim of promoting the dissemination of knowledge, CyTET joins the Open Journal Access (OA) movement and delivers all of its content to various national and international indexes, repositories and databases under this protocol; therefore, the submission of a work to be published in the journal presupposes the explicit acceptance by the author of this distribution method.
Authors are encouraged to reproduce and host their work published in CyTET in institutional repositories, web pages, etc. with the intention of contributing to the improvement of the transfer of knowledge and the citation of said works.