From reconstruction to Integrated Sustainable Urban Development
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37230/CyTET.2022.212.1Keywords:
Urban regeneration, Governance, Public policies, Cities, Integrated Sustainable Urban Development model (ISUD)Abstract
This work develops a reflection on the names that interventions in urban areas have acquired over time. Specifically, it makes an approach to the concepts coined for this type of actions and their materialization in the composition and nature of the public policies associated with them: their content, implementation models and spaces generated for the establishment of governance coalitions. It concludes in the concept of the integrated sustainable urban development model (MDUSI), the one on which policy frameworks such as the 2030 Agenda (and its urban SDGs) or urban agendas, promoted from different levels of government, are based.
Downloads
References
Andersen, H.T, (2001): “The new urban politics of Europe. The area-based-approach to regeneration policy”. En: H.T. Andersen and R. Van Kempen, (Eds.), Governing European Cities. Hampshire, UK: Ashgate.
Andrew, C. & Goldsmith, M. (1998): From local government to local governance and beyond? International Political Science Review, 19 (2), 101-117.
Antalovsky, E. & Dangschat, J.S. & Parkinson.M (eds.) (2005): European Metropolitan Governance Cities in Europe – Europe in the Cities, https://urbact.eu/sites/default/files/cities_in_europe.pdf
Aparicio, A. & di Nanni, R. (2011): Modelos de gestión de regeneración urbana. Madrid, SEPES.
Atkinson R. (1999a): Discourses of Partnership and Empowerment in Contemporary British Urban Regeneration. Urban Studies, 36(1), 59-72.
Atkinson R. (1999b): “Countering urban social exclusion: the role of community participation in urban regeneration”. En G. Haughton (ed.): Community economic development. London: The Stationary Office and the Regional Studies Association .
Berg, L. & Braun. E & Van der Meer. J (2004): National Urban Policies in European Union. Rotterdam: Euricur.
Bianchini, F. & M. Parkinson (eds.) (1993): Cultural policy and urban regeneration: the West European Experience. Manchester University Press.
Blanco, I. & Subirats, J. (2012): Políticas urbanas en España: dinámicas de transformación y retos ante la crisis. Geopolítica(s). Revista de estudios sobre espacio y poder, 3 (1), 15-33.
Bonneville, M. (2005): The ambiguity of urban renewal in France: Between continuity and rupture. Journal of Housing and the Built environment, 20(3), 229-242.
Brendan, B. & Shine, K.T. (2001): Regeneración Urbana en Dublin. Ciudad y Territorio: Estudios Territoriales, 129, 461-474.
Carmon, N. (1999): Three generations of urban renewal policies: analysis and policy implications. Geoforum, 30, 145-158.
Carpenter, J. (2013): “Sustainable Urban Regeneration within the European Union. A case of ‘Europeanization’?” En Leary E.M. and McCarthy, J.: The Routledge Companion to Urban Regeneration. London: Routledge.
Carpenter. J & al. (2020): “Variegated Europeanization and urban policy: Dynamics of policy transfer in France, Italy, Spain and the UK”, European Urban and Regional Studies, 27(3), https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776419898508
Castrillo, M. & Matesanz. A & Sánchez Fuentes. D & Sevilla, A (2014): ¿Regeneración urbana? Deconstrucción y reconstrucción de un concepto incuestionado. Papeles de relaciones ecosociales y cambio global, 126, 129-139
Coaffe, J. & Healy. P (2003): My Voice: My Place: Traking transformations in urban governance. Urban Studies, 40 (10), 1979-1999.
Cochrane, A. (2007): Understanding urban policy: A critical approach. Oxford: Blackwell.
Couch, C. & Fraser, C. & Percy, S. (2003): Urban regeneration in Europe. Oxford: Blackwell.
Davies, J.S. (2002): Urban Regime Theory: a Normative-Empirical Critique. Journal of Urban Affairs, 24 (1), 1-17.
de Gregorio Hurtado, S. (2018): The EU urban policy in the period 2007–13: lessons from the Spanish experience, Regional Studies, Regional Science, 5 (1), 212-230.
Furbey, R. (1999): Urban Regeneration: Reflections on a Metaphor. Critical Social Policy, 19, 419-445.
González Medina, M. (2011): “Elementos de una política urbana europea. Experiencias de gestión del desarrollo urbano en Alemania y España”, Revista española de ciencia política, 27, 45-67
González Medina, M. (2013): La europeización urbana a través de la política de cohesión. Revista CIDOB d’Afers Internacionals, 104, 133–154.
González Medina, M. (2018): “Del enfoque integrado de desarrollo urbano sostenible de la Unión Europea al paradigma de la gobernanza urbana en España”, en Retos del desarrollo urbano sostenible e integrado / María Rosario Alonso Ibáñez (dir.), Madrid: Tirant lo Blanch, 35-64 ”
González Medina, M. & Fedeli. V (2015): “Explorando la Política urbana europea: ¿Hacia una agenda urbana nacional-europea?”, Gestión y Análisis De Políticas Públicas. Nueva época, 14, 8–22.https://doi.org/10.24965/gapp.v0i14.10287
Hall, T. (2006): Urban Geography. 3erd Edition. Routledge.
Harvey, D. (1989): From managerialism to enterpreneuraslism: the transformation of urban governance in late capitalism. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 71 (1), 3-17.
Healey, P. (1995): The institutional challenge for sustainable urban regeneration, Cities,12(4), 221-230.
Healey, P. (1997): Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies. London: Macmillan.
Huete García, M.A. & Merinero Rodríguez. R (2021): La agenda urbana. Un instrumento de política pública para las ciudades. Madrid: Catarata.
Huete García, M.A. & Merinero Rodríguez. R & Muñoz Moreno. R (2015): Los sistemas locales de bienestar. Un análisis desde las políticas de regeneración urbana. Revista de Estudios Políticos (nueva época), 169, 361-366.
Jensen-Butler, C. & Shachar, A & Van Weesp, J. (eds) (1997): European cities in competition. Alsershot: Ashgate.
John, P. (2001): Local governance in Western Europe. London: Sage.
Lang, T. (2005): Insights in the British debate about urban decline and urban regeneration. Working paper, Erkner, Leibniz-Institute for Regional Development and Structural Planning.
Le Galés, P. (2002): European cities: social conflicts and governance. Oxford University Press.
Logan, J. & Molotch, H. (1987): Urban fortunes. University of California Press.
Lombardi, R.D. & Porter, L. & Barber, A. & Rogers, C. (2010): Conceptualising sustainability in UK urban Regeneration: a discursive Formation, Urban Studies, ISSN 0042-0980
Lowndes V. & H. Sullivan (2004): Like a horse and carriage or a fish on a bicycle: How well do local partnerships and public participation go together? Local Government Studies, 30 (1), 51-73.
Marshall, A. (2003a): European Regional Policy and Urban Governance: assessing reforms and renewal in Britain and Ireland. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Cambridge .
Marshall, A. (2003b): Urban and local governance: the growing European dimension. Journal of European Public Policy, 10 (3): 478–485.
Merinero Rodríguez, R. & Huete García, M.A. (2020): “El modelo de intervención de las agendas urbanas. Análisis desde una perspectiva multinivel”. En R. Alonso Ibáñez, S. De Gregorio Hurtado y M. González Medina (Eds.): Las agendas urbanas y el gobierno de las ciudades. Transformaciones, desafíos e instrumentos. Madrid: Reus.
Moya, L. & Diez, A. (2012): La intervención en la ciudad construida: acepciones terminológicas. Urban NS04, 113-123.
Mustard, S., & Ostendorf, W. (2014): Urban segregation and the welfare state. London: Routledge.
Newman, J. (2005): Governance: Policy, politics and public sphere remaking. Bristol University Press.
Osborne, D. & Gaebler, T. (1992): Reinventing government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector. New York: Addison- Wesley.
Parés, M. & Martí-Costa, M. & Blanco, I. (2014): Geographies of governance: how place matters in urban regeneration policies. Urban Studies, 51(15), 3250-3267.
Pierre, J. (1999): Models of urban governance. The institutional dimension of Urban Politics. Urban Affairs, 34 (3), 372- 396.
Roberts, P. (2000): The Evolution, Definition and Purpose of Ur¬ban Regeneration. London: Sage.
Rubio-Huertas, E. & Ureña-Francés, J. M. (2021): Evaluación de la efectividad en la regeneración urbana de nuestras ciudades. Lecciones aprendidas. Ciudad y Territorio. Estudios Territoriales. Vol. LIII, (207), 47-64.
Sorensen, E. & Torfing. J (2005): The democratic anchorage of governance networks. Scandinavian political studies, 28 (3), 195-218.
Stewart M. (1994): Between Whitehall and town hall: the realignment of urban regeneration policy in England, Policy and Politics, 22 (2), 133–45.
Stoker, G. (2004): Transforming Local Governance: From Thatcherism to New Labour. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Swyngedouw, E. (2004): Governance Innovation and the Citizen: The Janus Face of Governance-beyond-the-State. Urban Studies, 42, 11, 1991-2006.
Taylor, M. (2007): Community participation in the Real Word: Opportunities and Pitfalls in the New Governance Spaces. Urban Studies, 44, 297-317.
Verhage, R. (2005): Renewing urban renewal in France, the UK and the Netherlands: Introduction. Journal of housing and the built environment, 20(3), 215-227.
Zamora, E. & Merinero, R. (2012): Desarrollo urbano integral: orientaciones metodológicas para el diseño de políticas públicas en barrios. Ciudad y Territorio, Estudios Territoriales, 173, 145-462.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 María Ángeles Huete García, Rafael Merinero Rodríguez
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Considering the provisions of the current legislation on Intellectual Property, and in accordance with them, all authors publishing in CyTET give -in a non-exclusive way and without time limit- to the Ministry of Transport, Mobility and Urban Agenda the rights to disseminate, reproduce, communicate and distribute in any current or future format, on paper or electronic, the original or derived version of their work under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivative 4.0 license International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), as well as to include or assign to third parties the inclusion of its content in national and international indexes, repositories and databases, with reference and recognition in any case of its authorship.
In addition, when sending the work, the author(s) declares that it is an original work in which the sources that have been used are recognized, committing to respect the scientific evidence, to no longer modify the original data and to verify or refute its hypothesis. Author(s) also declare that the essential content of the work has not been previously published nor will it be published in any other publication while it is under evaluation by CyTET; and that it has not been simultaneously sent to another journal.
Authors must sign a Transfer of Rights Form, which will be sent to them from the CyTET Secretariat once the article is accepted for publication.
With the aim of promoting the dissemination of knowledge, CyTET joins the Open Journal Access (OA) movement and delivers all of its content to various national and international indexes, repositories and databases under this protocol; therefore, the submission of a work to be published in the journal presupposes the explicit acceptance by the author of this distribution method.
Authors are encouraged to reproduce and host their work published in CyTET in institutional repositories, web pages, etc. with the intention of contributing to the improvement of the transfer of knowledge and the citation of said works.
Enlace a CyTET en Linkedin
Hashtag en Twitter: #RevistaCyTET