In search of an unstable balance in high-performance scientific groups: Styles of collaboration and leadership

Authors

  • Simone Belli Departamento de Antropología Social y Psicología Social, Facultad de Ciencias Políticas y Sociología. Universidad Complutense de Madrid
  • Carlos López Carrasco Departamento de Antropología Social y Psicología Social, Facultad de Ciencias Políticas y Sociología. Universidad Complutense de Madrid

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22325/fes/res.2023.148

Keywords:

scientific collaboration, leadership, research groups, high performance, ERC

Abstract

This work aims to explore the influence of socio-organizational factors on the ways in which scientists represent and implement collaboration within their research groups. We have carried out field work based on semi-structured interviews with members of high-performance research groups, supported by the analysis of ethnographic observations in profesional work contexts of several of these groups. We start from four axes whose balance scientists consider key to their collaborative practices: instrumentality, affectivity, hierarchy and aggregation. From this, we have rebuilt two styles of collaboration, one based on the search for group cohesion and the other focused on structure and certainty. Factors such as the size and seniority of the groups and the trajectory of the principal investigators are important in understanding the collaboration styles that are promoted in each group.

References

Alonso, L. E. (1998). La mirada cualitativa en sociología: una aproximación interpretativa. Madrid: Fundamentos.

Alvesson, M., & Kärreman, D. (2000). Varieties of discourse: On the study of organizations through discourse analysis. Human Relations, 53(9), 1125-1149. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726700539002

Amabile, T. M., Schatzel, E. A., Moneta, G. B., & Kramer, S. J. (2004). Leader behaviors and the work environment for creativity: Perceived leader support. The Leadership Quarterly, 15(1), 5-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.12.003

Bandura, A. A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.

Barron, B. (2003). When smart groups fail. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12, 307-359. https://doi.org/10.1207/ S15327809JLS1203_1.

Beaver, D. D. (2001). Reflections on scientific collaboration (and its study): past, present, and future. Scientometrics, 52(3), 365-377. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014254214337

Belli, S., & Balta, J. (2019). Mapeo de las publicaciones científicas entre América Latina, el Caribe y la Unión Europea. América Latina Hoy, 82, 7-41

Benozzo, A., & Colley, H. (2012). Emotion and learning in the workplace: critical perspectives. Journal of Workplace Learning, 24(5), 304-316. https://doi.org/10.1108/13665621211239903

Birnholtz, J. (2007). When do researchers collaborate? Towards a model of collaboration propensity. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(14), 2226-2239. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20684

Borrego, A. (1999). La investigación cualitativa y sus aplicaciones en Biblioteconomía y Documentación. Revista española de Documentación Científica, 22(2), 139-156. https://doi.org/10.3989/redc.1999.v22.i2.335

Bozeman, B., & Gaughan, M. (2011). How do men and women differ in research collaborations?. Research Policy, 40(10), 1393-1402.

Bozeman, B., Fay, D., & Slade, C. P. (2013). Research collaboration in universities and academic entrepreneurship: the-state-of-the-art. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 38, 1-67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-012-9281-8

Callon, M., Rip, A. & Law, J. (1986). Mapping the Dynamics of Science and Technology: Sociology of Science in the Real World. London: Macmillan Press.

D’Este, P., Ramos-Vielba, I., Woolley, R., & Amara, N. (2018). How do researchers generate scientific and societal impacts? Toward an analytical and operational framework. Science and Public Policy, 45(6), 752-763.

D.O.R.A. (2012). San Francisco declaration on research assessment (DORA).

Damşa, C. I. (2014). The multi-layered nature of small-group learning: Productive interactions in object-oriented collaboration. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 9(3), 247-281.

Engle, R. A., & Conant, F. C. (2002). Guiding principles for fostering productive disciplinary engagement: Explaining an emergent argument in a community of learners’ classroom. Cognition and Instruction, 20(4), 399-483.

Estalella A., & Sánchez Criado, T. (Eds.). (2018). Experimental Collaborations. Ethnography through Fieldwork Devices. New York: Berghahn.

Fairhurst, G. T. y Cooren, F. (2009). Leadership as the hybrid production of presence(s). Leadership, 5(4), 469-490. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742715009343033

Fairhurst, G. T., & Uhl-Bien, M. (2012). Organizational discourse analysis (ODA): Examining leadership as a relational process. The Leadership Quarterly, 23(6), 1043-1062. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.10.005

Fineman, S. (2003). Understanding Emotion at Work. London: SAGE.

Finkel, L., Parra, P., y Baer, A. (2008). Entrevista abierta en investigación social: trayectorias profesionales de exdeportistas de élite. En Estrategias y prácticas cualitativas de investigación social. Madrid: Pearson.

Furberg, A., & Ludvigsen, S. R. (2008). Students’ meaning–making of socio–scientific issues in computer– mediated settings: Exploring learning through interaction trajectories. International Journal of Science Education, 30, 1775-1799. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701543617.

Gómez-Ferri, J.; y González-Alcaide, G. (2018). “Patrones y estrategias en la colaboración científica: la percepción de los investigadores”. Revista Española de Documentación Científica, 41(1), e199. https://doi.org/10.3989/redc.2018.1.1458

Haas, E. B. (1980). “Why Collaborate? Issue-Linkage and International Regimes”. World Politics, 32, 357-405. https://doi.org/10.2307/2010109

Hackett, E. J. (2005). Essential tensions: Identity, control, and risk in research. Social Studies of Science, 35(5), 787-826. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312705056045

Hara, N., Solomon, P., Kim, S. L., & Sonnenwald, D. H. (2003). An emerging view of scientific collaboration: Scientists' perspectives on collaboration and factors that impact collaboration. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(10), 952-965. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.10291

Harré, R., & van Langenhove, L. (Eds.) (1999): Positioning Theory: Moral contexts of Intentional Action. Oxford: Blackwell.

Healey, M. P., & Hodgkinson, G. P. (2017). Making Strategy Hot. California Management Review, 59(3), 109-134. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125617712258

Hechanova, R., & Cementina-Olpoc, R. (2013). Transformational Leadership, Change Management, and Commitment to Change: A Comparison of Academic and Business Organizations. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 22, 11-19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-012-0019-z

Hicks, D., Wouters, P., Waltman, L., de Rijcke, S., & Rafols, I. (2015). The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics. Nature, 520(7548), 9-11. https://doi.org/10.1038/520429a

Hoekman, J., Frenken, K., & Tijssen, R. J. (2010). Research Collaboration at a Distance: Changing Spatial Patterns of Scientific Collaboration within Europe. Research Policy, 41(4), 520-531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.012

Katz, J. S., & Martin, B.R. (1997). What is research collaboration?. Research Policy, 26, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(96)00917-1

Knorr-Cetina, K. (1999). Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Krange, I. (2007). Students’ conceptual practices in science education—Productive disciplinary interactions in a participation trajectory. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 2, 171-203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-006-9040-y.

Kwiek, M. (2020). What large-scale publication and citation data tell us about international research collaboration in Europe: changing national patterns in global contexts. Studies in Higher Education, 45, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2020.1749254

Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1986). Laboratory Life: The construction of Scientific facts. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

Leydesdorff, L., & Milojević, S. (2015). Scientometrics. In M. Lynch (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of Social and Behavioral Sciences. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

Liebowitz, J. (2008). “Think of others” in knowledge management: making culture work for you. Knowledge Management Research and Practice, 1, 47-51. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.kmrp.8500162

Ludvigsen, S. (2010). Sociogenesis and cognition. The struggle between social and cognitive activities. In B. Schwarz, T. Dreyfus, & R. Hershkowitz (Eds.), Transformation of knowledge through classroom interaction (pp. 302-318). New York: Routledge.

Maestre, F. T. 2019. Ten simple rules towards healthier research labs. PLoS computational biology, 15(4). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006914

Molas-Gallart, J., & Tang, P. (2011) Tracing ‘Productive Interactions’ to Identify Social Impacts: An Example from the Social Sciences. Research Evaluation, 20(3), 219-226.

Mumford, M., Scott, G. M., Gaddis, B., & Strange, J. M. (2002). Leading creative people: Orchestrating expertise and relationships. Leadership Quarterly, 13(6), 705-750. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(02)00158-3

Newman, M. (2001). The structure of scientific collaboration networks. PNAS, 98(2), 404-409. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.98.2.404

Paavola, S., & Hakkarainen, K. (2005). The knowledge creation metaphor—an emergent epistemological approach to learning. Science & Education, 14, 535-557. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-004-5157-0

Pearce, C. L. (2004). The future of leadership: Combining vertical and shared leadership to transform knowledge work. The Academy of Management Executive, 18(1), 47-59. https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.2004.12690298

Raelin, J. A. (2013). The manager as facilitator of dialogue. Organization, 20(6), 818-839. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508412455085

Remesal, A., & Colomina, R. (2013). Social presence in online small collaborative group work: a socioconstructivist account. Computers & Education, 60, 357-367. https://doi.org/S0360131512001698

Sarmiento–Klapper, J. W. (2009). The sequential co–construction of the joint problem space. In G. Stahl, & Studying Virtual Math Team (Eds.), Computer–supported collaborative learning series (pp. 83-98). New York: Springer.

Shrum, W., Chompalov, I., & Genuth, J. (2001). Trust, conflict and performance in scientific collaborations. Social Studies of Science, 31(5), 681-730 https://doi.org/10.1177/030631201031005002

Sonnenwald, D. H. (2007). Scientific collaboration. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 4, 643-681. https://doi.org/10.1002/aris.2007.1440410121

Spaapen, J., & van Drooge, L. (2011) Introducing ‘Productive Interactions’ in Social Impact Assessment. Research Evaluation, 20(3), 211-218.

Sutherland, N. (2016). Investigating leadership ethnographically: Opportunities and potentialities. Leadership, 14(3), 263-290. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742715016676446

Tsai, C., Corley, E., & Bozeman, B. (2016). Collaboration experiences across scientific disciplines and cohorts. Scientometrics, 108(2), 505-529. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1997-z

Uhl-Bien, M. (2006). Relational leadership theory: Exploring the social processes of leadership and organizing. The Leadership Quarterly, 17(6), 654-676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.10.007

Valsiner, J. (1994). Bidirectional cultural transmission and constructive sociogenesis. In W. de Graaf & R. Maier (Eds.), Sociogenesis reexamined (pp. 47-70). New York: Springer.

Valsiner, J., & Van der Veer, R. (2000). The social mind: Construction of the idea. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Van De Mieroop, D., Clifton, J, & Verhelst, A. (2020). Investigating the interplay between formal and informal leaders in a shared leadership configuration: A multimodal conversation analytical study. Human Relations, 73(4), 490-515. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726719895077

Verbree, M. (2011). Dynamics of Academic Leadership in Research Groups. Den Haag: Rathenau Instituut.

Vermeulen, N., Parker, J. N., & Penders, B. (2013). Understanding life together: A brief history of collaboration in biology. Endeavour, 37(3), 162-171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.endeavour.2013.03.001

Wagner, C. S. (2018). The Collaborative Era in Science. Governing the Network. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.

Wellcome Trust. (2020). What researchers think about the culture they work. London: Wellcome Trust. https://wellcome.ac.uk/sites/default/files/what-researchers-think-about-the-culture-they-work-in.pdf

Wertsch, J. V. (1991). Voices of the mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Whitley, R. 2000. The intellectual and social organization of the sciences. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Published

2022-11-24

How to Cite

Belli, S., & López Carrasco, C. (2022). In search of an unstable balance in high-performance scientific groups: Styles of collaboration and leadership. Spanish Journal of Sociology, 32(1), a148. https://doi.org/10.22325/fes/res.2023.148