Horace, Carm. 1, 1, 35–36 and 1, 28, 23–25: a Critical Rereading
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23808/rel.v25i1.115213Keywords:
Horace, Odes, Textual CriticismAbstract
This article reviews the editing proposals regarding two editorial problems in Horace's Odes
Downloads
References
Axt, Moritz (1846): Zur Erklärung und Kritik der horazischen Epoden, Freuznach.
Berti, Emanuele (2024): «Ovidio, Cicerone e il finale delle Metamorfosi», Philologus 168, 147–167. DOI: ‹https://doi.org/10.1515/phil-2023--0042›.
Bohlin, Ericus O. (2008): «Hor. Carm. 1.28.23–5: adnotatiuncula critica», Mnemosyne 61, 138–139. URL: ‹http://www.jstor.org/stable/27736201›.
Brink, Charles O. (1981): «Horatian Poetry: Thoughts on the Development of Textual Criticism and Interpretation», Wolfenbutteler Forschungen 12, 11–14.
Burckhardt, Georgine (1934) : «ēn interiectio», Thesaurus Linguae Latinae, Vol. v/2, pp. 545–549. Berlín – Nueva York: De Gruyter.
Campbell, Archibald Young (1945): Q. Horati Flacci Carmina cum Epodis edidit, emendavit adnotavit A. Y. Campbell. Londres, E prelo academico Lerpulensi. Hodder & Stoughton.
Campbell, Archibald Young (1946): «Horace, Odes i. xxviii. 7–15 and 24», CR 60, 103–106. URL: ‹https://www.jstor.org/stable/703285›.
Campbell, Archibald Young (1953): Horace. Odes and Epodes, re-edited with Notes in English supplementary to the Notes of the first edition by A. Y. Campbell, Liverpool, University Press of Liverpool.
Canali (1991): Q. Orazio Flacco, Le Opere, i Le odi, Il Carme Secolare, Gli Epodi. Tomo primo. Introduzione di Francesco della Corte. Testo critico di Paola Venini. Traduzione di Luca Canale, Roma, Libreria dello Stato.
Cancela Cilleruelo, Álvaro (2024): «Reseña a Julia Aguilar Miquel (ed.), Taio Caesaraugustanus. Liber sententiarum, CC. SL. 116A, Turnhout, Brepols, 2022», RELat 24, 211–220. DOI: ‹https://doi.org/10.23808/rel.v24i.112178›.
Combe, Carolus (1792): Quincti Horatii Flacci Opera, cum variis lectionibus, notis variorum, et indice locupletissimo, Londres, Gulielmus Browne and Johannes Warren.
Cuningamius, Alexander (1721): Alexandri Cuningamii Animadversiones in Richardi Bentelii notas et emendationes ad Q. Horatium Flaccum, The Hague, Fratres Vaillant & N. Prevost.
Delz, Joseph (1973): «Glossen Im Horaztext?», MH 30, 51–54. URL: ‹http://www.jstor.org/stable/24814399›.
Earle, Mortimer L. (1902): «On the First Ode of Horace», CR 16, 398–401. URL:‹http://www.jstor.org/stable/696185›.
Earle, Mortimer L. (1904): «Notes on Horace», CR 18, 391–392. URL: ‹http://www.jstor.org/stable/695494›.
Estévez Sola, Juan A. (2023): «Una nota a Horacio, Carm. 1.15.36», Latomus 82, 817–822. DOI: ‹https://doi.org/%2010.2143/LAT.82.4.3292697›.
Fea, Carlo (1811): Quincti Horatii Flacci Opera ad mss. codices Vaticanos, Chisianos, Angelicos, Barberinos, Gregorianos, Vallicellanos aliosque plurimis in locis emendavit notisque illustravit praesertim in iis quae Romanas Antiquitates spectant Carolus Fea. Tomus i, Roma.
Fea, Carlo (1820): Quincti Horatii Flacci Opera ad mss. codices Vaticanos, Chisianos, Angelicos, Barberinos, Gregorianos, Vallicellanos aliosque plurimis in locis emendavit notisque illustravit praesertim in iis quae Romanas Antiquitates spectant Carolus Fea. Denuo recensuit F. H. Bothe. Tomus i. Heidelbergae et Spirae 1820.
Fernández-Galiano, Manuel (1990): Horacio, Odas y Epodos. Edición bilingüe de M. Fernández-Galiano y V. Cristóbal, Madrid, Cátedra.
Fratantuono, Lee M. & Alden Smith Roland (2022): Virgil, Aeneid 4. Text, Translation, and Commentary, Leiden, Brill.
Friedrich, Gustav (1894): Q. Horatius Flaccus. Philologische Untersuchungen, Leipzig.
Frischer, Bernard (1984): «Horace and the Monuments: A New Interpretation of the Archytas Ode (c 1.28)», HSPh 88, 71–102. ‹https://doi.org/10.2307/311446›.
Geiger, Jonathan (2017): «Strictness, Freedom, and Experimentation in Horatian and Senecan Metrics», en M. Stöckinger, K. Winter & A. Zanker (ed.), Horace and Seneca: Interactions, Intertexts, Interprétations, Berlín – Boston, De Gruyter, 159–182. DOI:‹https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110528893--008›.
Goetling, Carl (1854): Gesammelte Abhandlungen aus dem classischen Alterthume, Halle.
Goetlingius, Carolus (1854): «Commentatio de Horatii Od. i, 28», en Novi Prorectoratus Auspicia D. IIII M. Februarii A. MDCCCLII Rite Capienda Civibus Indicit Academia Ienensis, Jena.
Graser, Friedrich W. (1832): «Reseña a J. B. M. Gence, Q. Horatii Flacci, ex ed. Bipontina ii, ad optimas lectiones Mss. et Edd. nova editio recensita, Parisiis 1828», Ergänzungsblätter Zur Allgemeinen Literatur-Zeitung 47–48, 369–376, 377–384, 385–387.
Habermehl, Peter (2006): Petronius satyrica 79–141 ein philologisch-literarischher kommentar. Band 1: Sat. 79–110, Berlín – Boston, De Gruyter.
Hardie, Philip (2009): Lucretian Receptions. History, The Sublime, Knowledge, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Hardie, Philip & Chiarini, Gioachino (2015): Ovidio. Metamorfosi. Vol. vi, Libro xiii–xv, Milán, Fondazione Lorenzo Valla, Arnoldo Mondadori Editore.
Holzberg, Niklas (2018): Quintus Horatius Flaccus, Sämtliche Werke. Lateinischdeutsch. Herausgegeben und übersetzt von Niklas Holzberg, Berlín – Boston, De Gruyter.
Hülsenbeck, Friedrich (1882): Kritische Studien zu den Oden des Horaz, Paderborn.
Jacob, Johann F. (1846): M. Manili Astronomicon libri quinque. Accedit index et diagrammata astrologica, Berlín.
Jones, John (1736): Quintus Horatius Flaccus, Londres.
Lambinus, Dionysus (1561): Q. Horatius Flaccus ex fide atque auctoritate decem librorum manu scriptorum, opera Dionysi Lambini Monstroliensis emendatus ab eodemque commentariis copiosissimis illustratus nunc primum in lucem editus, Lugduni.
Liberman, Gauthier (2009): «L. on Zehnacker on Liberman on Zehnacker, Pline le Jeune. Lettres: Livres i–iii. Nouvelle édition. Response to 2009.08.15», BMCR 2009.09.44. URL: ‹https://bmcr.brynmawr.edu/2009/2009.09.44/›.
Luck, Georg (1981): «Textual Criticism Today», AJPh 102, 164–194. DOI: ‹https://doi.org/10.2307/294310›.
Mader, Gottfried (2013): «Re-Presenting Piso: Poetic and Political Agenda in the “Laus Pisonis”», CW 106, 621–643. URL: ‹http://www.jstor.org/stable/24699702›.
Mayer, Roland (2012): Horace Odes Book i, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Moralejo, José Luis (2007): Horacio, Odas, Canto Secular, Epodos, Madrid, Gredos.
Muretus, Marcus A. (1555): Horatius. M. Antonii Mureti in eundem annotationes…Venetiis.
Nisbet, Robin G. M. (1986): «A Rival Teubner Horace», review of Q. Horati Flacci Opera by Horace and D. R. Shackleton Bailey, CR 36, 227–234. URL: ‹https://www.jstor.org/stable/3064550›.
Nisbet, Robin G. M. & Hubbard, Margaret (1970): A Commentary on Horace: Odes Book i, Oxford, At the Clarendon Press.
Peerlkamp, Petrus H. (1834): Q. Horatii Flacci Carmina, Vincent Loosjes, Haarlem.
Pianezzola, Ezio; Baldo, Gianluigi; et al. (2024): Orazio. Odi. Vol. i (Libri i–ii), Milán, Mondadori.
Plüss, Theodor (1886): «Zur Erklärung der horazischen Oden», Neue Jahrbücher für Philologie und Paedagogik 56, 115–129.
Redslob, Ernst (1912): Kritische Bemerkungen zu Horaz, Weimar, A. Dunker.
Renehan, Robert (1988): «Shackleton Bailey and the Editing of Latin Poetry: A Latin Classic», CPh 83, 311–328. URL: ‹https://www.jstor.org/stable/269511›.
Richardson, Lawrence J. D. (1942): «An unpublished edition of Horace’s “Odes” by the late Professor Arthur Palmer», Hermathena 60, 87–111. URL: ‹https://www.jstor.org/stable/23037421›.
Río Torres-Murciano, Antonio (2016): «La sphragís de las Metamorfosis de Ovidio (xv 871–879). Metempsicosis, apoteosis y perdurabilidad literaria», Emerita 84, 269–289. DOI: ‹https://doi.org/10.3989/emerita.2016.13.1503›.
Rivero García, Luis (2018): Book xiii of Ovid’s Metamorphoses: A Textual Commentary, Berlín – Boston, De Gruyter.
Rudd, Niall (2004): Horace, Odes and Epodes, Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press.
Shackleton Bailey, David R. (4 2001): Q. Horati Flacci Opera, Berlín – Nueva York, De Gruyter.
Shorey, Paul (1898): Horace. Odes and Epodes, Boston, B. H. Sanborn & co.
Tarrant, Richard (2015): «A New Critical Edition of Horace», en R. L. Hunter, S. P. Oakley, Latin Literature and Its Transmission. Papers in Honour of Michael Reeve, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 305–335
Trappes-Lomax, John (2004): «Hiatus in Vergil and in Horace’s “Odes”», Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 50, 141–158. URL: ‹https://www.jstor.org/stable/44696694›.
Teichmüller, Ferdinand (1911): Das Nichthorazische in der Horazüberlieferung, Berlín, E. Hofmann & co.
Unger, Robert (1872): Emendationes Horatianae, Halle an der Saale, C. E. M. Pfeffer.
Vergés, Josep (1978): Q. Horaci Flac, Odes i Epodes. Vol. i Odes, llibres i–ii, Barcelona, Fundació Bernat Metge.
Vollmer, Friedrich (1912): Q. Horati Flacci Carmina recensuit Fridericus Vollmer. Editio maior iterata et correcta, Leipzig, Teubner.
Villeneuve, François (1929): Horace. Odes et Épodes, París, Les Belles Lettres.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Revista de Estudios Latinos
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The originals published in the printed and electronic editions of this journal are the property of the Revista de Estudios Latinos and can be circulated as long as the original source and authorship is made clear in any reproduction, full or partial, of the same, and as long as this is not done for commercial purposes.
Funding data
-
Ministerio de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación
Grant numbers PID2022-136988NB-I00
