El planteamiento de la cuestión prejudicial comunitaria a la luz de la jurisprudencia europea y constitucional: ¿facultad o deber?

Authors

  • Juana Morcillo Moreno

Keywords:

European preliminary ruling, primacy, constitutional protection, effective judicial protection, Value Added Tax (VAT), Canary Islands General Indirect Tax

Abstract

In its Judgment no. 78/2010 the Constitutional Court of Spain specifically announced a correction concerning its previous doctrine on the European preliminary ruling. In the instant case the Court rejected the request for constitutional protection filed by the Autonomous Government of the Canary Islands. However, in a virtually identical case in 2006, the Constitutional Court had ruled in favour of the plaintiff (Judgment no. 194/2006, of June 19). This study aims at discovering the real innovations behind the announcement of a new doctrine. For this purpose, the most significant judgments on the topic have been reviewed, not only the ones issued by the Constitutional Court but also those by the European Court of Justice. The author concludes that the aforementioned correction of the previous doctrine only takes place when it comes to a particular case: the request by a national Court for a preliminary ruling if the provision allegedly breached were not applicable in a particular territory.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

How to Cite

Morcillo Moreno, J. (2015). El planteamiento de la cuestión prejudicial comunitaria a la luz de la jurisprudencia europea y constitucional: ¿facultad o deber?. Revista De Administración Pública, (185), 227–262. Retrieved from https://recyt.fecyt.es/index.php/RAP/article/view/40463

Issue

Section

CASE LAW

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.