The businessmen and strikes from stabilization to democracy, 1958-1978
Keywords:
Spain, businessmen, labor relations, strike, Franco’s regime, democratic transitionAbstract
In the historians approach to Franco’s regime, the workers’ strikes have been regarded as a central instrument of opposition to dictatorship and fight for democracy. This view does not take into account the necessary counterpart: the employer, seldom analised and often seen under biased lenses. The strike became partially tolerated by the authorities after the adoption of the Law Union Collective Agreements (1958), therefore it had to be accepted by employers as a lesser evil, a necessary counterpart to increase the productivity of their business and successfully meet the challenge of economic modernization. The pragmatic attitude allowed employers to claim the regulation of the right to strike while negotiating the settlement of conflicts in their firms outside the official channels. During the seventies business suffered increased strike pressure and felt a lack of support from the authorities, a feeling that lead to create a new business association and pushed for the signing of a social pact as a mechanism for, inter alia, contain and channel conflict strictly within the workplace.Downloads
Downloads
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Ángeles González Fernández
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors whose contributions are accepted for publication in this journal, accept the following terms:
a. The authors retain their copyright and guarantee to the magazine the right of first publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution License Attribution-Noncommercial-No derivative works 4.0 Spain, which allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and its first publication is indicated.
b. Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements to distribute the version of the published work (e.g. deposit in an institutional repository or archive, or published in a monographic volume) provided the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
PLAGIARISM AND SCIENTIFIC FRAUD
The publication of work that infringes on intellectual property rights is the sole responsibility of the authors, including any conflicts that may occur regarding infringement of copyright. This includes, most importantly, conflicts related to the commission of plagiarism and/or scientific fraud.
Plagiarism is understood to include:
1. Presenting the work of others as your own.
2. Adopting words or ideas from other authors without due recognition.
3. Not using quotation marks or another distinctive format to distinguish literal quotations.
4. Giving incorrect information about the true source of a citation.
5. The paraphrasing of a source without mentioning the source.
6. Excessive paraphrasing, even if the source is mentioned.
Practices constituting scientific fraud are as follows:
1. Fabrication, falsification or omission of data and plagiarism.
2. Duplicate publication.
3. Conflicts of authorship.