Georges Valois or the in/coherence of a non/conformist. A turn to fascism (1880-1925)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18042/hp.38.07Keywords:
Georges Valois, fascistization, counterrevolution, fin-de-siècle crisis, fascism.Abstract
The aim of this paper is to examine the relationship between the fin-de-siècle crisis and the birth of the Fascist experience in France taking into account the case of Georges Valois, whose discontent at the liberal order built in the 19th Century serves as a model. In order to understand the process of fascistization as the result of the revolt against the Third Republic, the work puts together the cultural framework and the national conceptions that emerged after the Sedan’s default. At the same time, all of these issues are connected by an interdisciplinary approach to the intelectual biography of Georges Valois. For this reason, a long term analysis that considers conjunctions as well as generations shifts has been used to a better comprehension of how mutable the political cultures were and how fascism emerged from the counterrevolutionary political space.Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 Joan Pubill Brugués
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors whose contributions are accepted for publication in this journal, accept the following terms:
a. The authors retain their copyright and guarantee to the magazine the right of first publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution License Attribution-Noncommercial-No derivative works 4.0 Spain, which allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and its first publication is indicated.
b. Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements to distribute the version of the published work (e.g. deposit in an institutional repository or archive, or published in a monographic volume) provided the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
PLAGIARISM AND SCIENTIFIC FRAUD
The publication of work that infringes on intellectual property rights is the sole responsibility of the authors, including any conflicts that may occur regarding infringement of copyright. This includes, most importantly, conflicts related to the commission of plagiarism and/or scientific fraud.
Plagiarism is understood to include:
1. Presenting the work of others as your own.
2. Adopting words or ideas from other authors without due recognition.
3. Not using quotation marks or another distinctive format to distinguish literal quotations.
4. Giving incorrect information about the true source of a citation.
5. The paraphrasing of a source without mentioning the source.
6. Excessive paraphrasing, even if the source is mentioned.
Practices constituting scientific fraud are as follows:
1. Fabrication, falsification or omission of data and plagiarism.
2. Duplicate publication.
3. Conflicts of authorship.
