Auschwitz in Bergen-Belsen: the Figure of the Witness and Cinematographic Discourses on Concentration Camps in the Immediate Post-War 7, 1945-1948
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18042/hp.34.11Keywords:
Auschwitz, memory, cinematography, witness, George Stevens, Wanda JakubowskaAbstract
aper studies the role played by the witness in the first cinematic representations of concentration and extermination camps. It focuses on the testimonies gathered by two different figures that become, in turn, two points of view of the happenings: the vision of the one who lived through it (superstes), as is the case with Wanda Jakubowska Director, and the vision of the one who was present as a third party (testis), the cameramen who filmed the liberation of the camps. On the very threshold of this vision of horror, from fiction to the documentary, both forms of testimony came into being as perspectives that doubt the representation of the evidence shown as an inconceivable reality. Then, after the montage, the internalization by the spectator becomes inseparable from the representation and the imagery of a vision of the world that went beyond the figure that films. And that view of the world was the hell of Auschwitz and Bergen-Belsen, model camps –in the West and in the East– from which the first memories began to be constructed based on the earliest reports of the crimes of Nazism, conditioned by the legal and political interpretations of the happenings. Only fiction was able to show the specificity reserved to the Jewish people: the difference between the concentration and the extermination camps.Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Pedro Payá López

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors whose contributions are accepted for publication in this journal, accept the following terms:
a. The authors retain their copyright and guarantee to the magazine the right of first publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution License Attribution-Noncommercial-No derivative works 4.0 Spain, which allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and its first publication is indicated.
b. Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements to distribute the version of the published work (e.g. deposit in an institutional repository or archive, or published in a monographic volume) provided the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
PLAGIARISM AND SCIENTIFIC FRAUD
The publication of work that infringes on intellectual property rights is the sole responsibility of the authors, including any conflicts that may occur regarding infringement of copyright. This includes, most importantly, conflicts related to the commission of plagiarism and/or scientific fraud.
Plagiarism is understood to include:
1. Presenting the work of others as your own.
2. Adopting words or ideas from other authors without due recognition.
3. Not using quotation marks or another distinctive format to distinguish literal quotations.
4. Giving incorrect information about the true source of a citation.
5. The paraphrasing of a source without mentioning the source.
6. Excessive paraphrasing, even if the source is mentioned.
Practices constituting scientific fraud are as follows:
1. Fabrication, falsification or omission of data and plagiarism.
2. Duplicate publication.
3. Conflicts of authorship.



