Developing a sense of human agency in childhood and adolescence through participatory experiences: enabling contexts and agentic qualities
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
INTRODUCTION. Girls, boys and adolescents are entitled to participation rights and citizenship status. To this should be added the recognition of their human agency, given that it is from their condition as agents that they will be able to exercise their rights autonomously. This study aims to identify the elements that enable children and adolescents to develop a sense of human agency, comparing their accounts of their participatory experiences in educational centres, leisure time and youth centres, family environments, digital environments and Childhood and Adolescence Councils. METHOD. Using a qualitative meta-synthesis analysis design (QMS), the data collected in three studies with a common research focus are analysed to reinterpret them and generate new knowledge. The QMS integrates the accounts of 150 children and adolescents between the ages of 8 and 18 years of age collected in 17 group discussions. The analysis is carried out in four phases: familiarisation, establishment of relationships, translation and synthesis of units and categories, and synthesis of results through narrative descriptions. RESULTS. Two thematic units are identified, the enabling context and the agentic qualities, together with their corresponding categories. Enabling contexts favour the development of a sense of agency and the exercise of human agency by children and adolescents. Agentic qualities are the attributes that children and adolescents express with respect to their sense of agency. DISCUSSION. There are significant differences in the development of children’s and adolescents’ sense of agency depending on the context and the roles in which the participatory experiences unfold, with those that take place as democratic citizenship being the ones that genuinely favour it. The identified elements provide a
framework for creating enabling contexts that allow the recognition and development of children
and adolescents’ sense of human agency through genuine democratic participation.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
References
Alanen, L. (1988). Rethinking childhood. Acta Sociologica, 31(1), 53-67. https://doi.org/10.1177/000169938803100105
Alkire, S. (2008). Concepts and Measures of Agency. In K. Basu and R. Kanbur (eds.), Arguments for a Better World: Essays in Honor of Amartya Sen: Volume I: Ethics, Welfare, and Measurement (Oxford, 2008; online edn, Oxford Academic, 1 May 2009) https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199239115.003.0025
Bandura, A. (2006). Toward a Psychology of Human Agency. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1(2), 164-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00011.x
Bandura, A. (2018). Toward a Psychology of Human Agency: Pathways and Reflections. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(2), 130-136. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617699280
Brighouse, H. (2002). What Rights (If Any) Do Children Have? In D. Archard and C. M. Macleod (eds.), The Moral and Political Status of Children (Oxford, 2002, online edn, Oxford Academic, 1 Nov. 2003) https://doi.org/10.1093/0199242682.003.0003
Crowley, A., Larkins, C. & Pinto, L. (2021). Listen–Act–Change Council of Europe Handbook on children’s participation for professionals working for and with children. Council of Europe. https://rm.coe.int/publication-handbook-on-children-s-participation-eng/1680a14539
Dailey, A. C. & Rosenbury, L.A. (2018). The new law of the child. The Yale Law Journal 127, 1448-1537. https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/ylr127&div=32&id=&page=
Dawson, A. J. (2019). Meta-synthesis of Qualitative Research. In Pranee Liamputtong (ed.), Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences. Springer Singapore, pp. 785-804. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5251-4_112
Dixon, R. & Nussbaum, M. (2012). Children’s Rights and a Capabilities Approach: The Question of Special Priority. Cornell Law Review, 97. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2060614
Edmonds, R. (2019). Making children’s agency visible: Towards the localisation of a concept in theory and practice. Global Studies of Childhood, 9(3), 200-211. https://doi.org/10.1177/2043610619860994
Erstad, O., Miño, R. & Rivera-Vargas, P. (2021). Prácticas educativas para transformar y conectar escuelas y comunidades. Comunicar: Revista Científica de Comunicación y Educación, 29(66), 21-31. https://doi.org/10.3916/C66-2021-01
Esteban, M. B. (2022). Children’s Participation, Progressive Autonomy, and Agency for Inclusive Education in Schools. Social Inclusion, 10(2), 43-53. https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v10i2.4936
Esteban Tortajada, M. B., Crespo i Torres, F., Novella Cámara, A. M. & Sabariego Puig, M. (2021). Aportes reflexivos para la investigación con las infancias. Corresponsabilidad en el avance de su participación. Sociedad e Infancias, 5(Especial), 21-33. https://doi.org/10.5209/soci.71444
Finfgeld, D. L. (2003). Metasynthesis: the state of the art-so far. Qualitative Health Research, 13(7), 893-904. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732303253462
Giddens, A. (1982). Profiles & Critiques is Social Theory. The Macmillan Press LTD.
Griffin, J. (2002). Do children have rights? In D. Archard and C. M. Macleod (eds.), The Moral and Political Status of Children (Oxford, 2002; online edn, Oxford Academic, 1 Nov. 2003), https://doi.org/10.1093/0199242682.003.0002
Hart, R. (1992). Children’s Participation: From tokenism to citizenship. Innocenti Essays 4. International Child Development Centre. https://www.unicef-irc.org/publications/100-childrens-participation-from-tokenism-to-citizenship.html
Jensen, L. A. & Allen, M. N. (1996). Meta-Synthesis of Qualitative Findings. Qualitative Health Research, 6(4), 553-560. https://doi.org/10.1177/104973239600600407
Kabeer, N. (1999), Resources, Agency, Achievements: Reflections on the Measurement of Women’s Empowerment. Development and Change, 30(3), 435-464. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7660.00125
Lansdown, G. (2005). The evolving capacities of the child. Innocenti Research Centre, UNICEF, Save the Children. https://www.unicef-irc.org/publications/384-the-evolving-capacities-of-the-child.html
Lawy, R. & Biesta, G. (2006). Citizenship-As-Practice: The educational implications of an inclusive and relational understanding of citizenship. British Journal of Educational Studies 54(1), 34-50. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8527.2006.00335.x
Levitt, H. M. (2018). How to conduct a qualitative meta-analysis: Tailoring methods to enhance methodological integrity. Psychotherapy Research, 28(3), 367-378. https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2018.1447708
Liebel, M. (2018). Welfare or agency? Children’s interests as foundation of children’s rights. The International Journal of Children’s Rights, 26(4), 597-625. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718182-02604012
Liebel, M. (2021). La niñez popular. Intereses, derechos y protagonismos de los niños y las niñas. Catarata.
Lindstrøm, T. (2015). Agency ‘in itself’. A discussion of inanimate, animal and human agency. Archaeological Dialogues, 22(2), 207-238. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1380203815000264
Lister, R. (2007). Why Citizenship: Where, When and How Children? Theoretical Inquiries in Law 8(2), 693-718. https://doi.org/10.2202/1565-3404.1165
Low, P., Panksepp, J., Reiss, D., Edelman, D., Van Swinderen, B. & Koch, C. (2012, July). The Cambridge Declaration on Consciousness. In Francis Crick Memorial Conference, Cambridge, England (pp. 1-2).
Mayall, B. (2002). Towards a Sociology for Childhood: thinking from children’s lives. Open University Press.
Moosa-Mitha, M. (2005). A difference-centred alternative to theorisation of children’s citizenship rights. Citizenship studies, 9(4), 369-388. https://doi.org/10.1080/13621020500211354
Oswell, D. (2012). The Agency of Children: From Family to Global Human Rights. Cambridge University Press.
Pinela Morán, N. P. (2018). El uso de la metasíntesis en la investigación. Res Non Verba, 8(2), 111-122. https://biblat.unam.mx/es/revista/res-non-verba-guayaquil/articulo/el-uso-de-la-metasintesis-en-la-investigacion
Reis, S., Leite, A., Alvarenga, W., Araújo, J., Zago, M. & Nascimento, L. (2017). Meta-synthesis about man as a father and caregiver for a hospitalised child. Revista Latino-americana de Enfermagem, 25. https://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.1850.2922
Roche, J. (1999). Children: Rights, Participation and Citizenship. Childhood, 6(4), 475-493. https://doi.org/10.1177/0907568299006004006
Sandelowski, M. (2004). Using Qualitative Research. Qualitative Health Research, 14, 1366-1386. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732304269672
Sandelowski, M., Docherty, S. & Emden, C. (1997). Focus on qualitative methods. Qualitative metasynthesis: issues and techniques. Research in nursing & health, 20(4), 365-371. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-240X(199708)20:4%3C365::AID-NUR9%3E3.0.CO;2-E
Sen, A. (1985). Well-Being, Agency and Freedom: The Dewey Lectures 1984. The Journal of Philosophy, 82(4), 169-221. https://doi.org/10.2307/2026184
Sutterlüty, F. & Tisdall, E. K. M. (2019). Agency, autonomy and self-determination: Questioning key concepts of childhood studies. Global Studies of Childhood, 9(3), 183-187. https://doi.org/10.1177/2043610619860992
Thomas, N. (2007). Towards a theory of children’s participation. The International Journal of Children’s Rights, 15(2), 199-218. https://doi.org/10.1163/092755607X206489
Trilla, J. & Novella, A. (2001). Educación y participación social de la infancia. Revista Iberoamericana de educación, 26, 137-166. https://doi.org/10.35362/rie260982
United Nations (1989). Convention on the Rights of the Child: Assembly resolution 44/25 of 20 November 1989. https://www.ohchr.org/EN/professionalinterest/pages/crc.aspx
Valentine, K. (2011). Accounting for agency. Children & Society 25(5), 347-358. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1099-0860.2009.00279.x
Wall, J. (2008). Human Rights in Light of Childhood, The International Journal of Children’s Rights, 16(4), 523-543. https://doi.org/10.1163/157181808X312122
Wood, B. E. (2016). A genealogy of the “everyday” within young people’s citizenship studies. In K. P. Kallio & S. Mills (eds.), Politics, Citizenship and Rights Volume7 of Skelton, T. (Editor-in-Chief) Geographies of Children and Young People (vol. 7, pp. 383-399). Springer Singapore.
Zavala Berbena, M. A. & Castañeda Figueiras, S. (2014). Fenomenología de agencia y educación. Notas para el análisis del concepto de agencia humana y sus proyecciones en el ámbito educativo. Magister, 26(2), 98-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0212-6796(14)70024-6