Narrativas excluyentes en el Sur de Europa: un análisis comparativo digital de los discursos sobre la migración en las Islas Canarias y Lampedusa
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22325/fes/res.2025.264Palabras clave:
crisis migratorias, discurso en redes sociales, narrativas excluyentes, Islas Canarias, Lampedusa, retórica antiinmigraciónResumen
Desde el inicio de la pandemia de COVID-19, las autoridades europeas han reforzado los controles fronterizos, lo que ha provocado un desplazamiento de las rutas migratorias hacia los puntos de entrada del sur, en particular las Islas Canarias y Lampedusa. Estas dinámicas han intensificado los debates en torno a la migración, la seguridad y la identidad. En este artículo, analizamos cómo los actores clave utilizan Twitter (actualmente X) para abordar estas crisis migratorias y construir narrativas excluyentes. A partir de un análisis de los discursos difundidos por políticos, medios de comunicación y organizaciones cívicas, identificamos a los actores predominantes, examinamos sus estrategias de encuadre discursivo y comparamos las narrativas resultantes en ambas regiones. Este estudio arroja luz sobre la interacción entre las redes sociales y la opinión pública, proporcionando información sobre cómo las plataformas digitales facilitan la construcción y amplificación de discursos xenófobos y hostiles. Nuestros hallazgos subrayan la necesidad urgente de comprender el papel de los medios digitales en la configuración de narrativas excluyentes y destacan los retos metodológicos derivados del acceso cada vez más restringido a los datos.
Citas
Abramitzky, R., Boustan, L., Jácome, E., Pérez, S., & Torres, J. D. (2024). Law-Abiding Immigrants: The Incarceration Gap Between Immigrants and the US-born, 1870–2020. American Economic Review: Insights. https://doi.org/10.1257/aeri.20230459
Acha, B. (2021). Analizar el auge de la ultraderecha. Surgimiento, ideología y ascenso de los nuevos partidos de ultraderecha. Gedisa.
Arcila Calderón, C., Blanco-Herrero, D., & Valdez Apolo, M. B. (2020). Rechazo y discurso de odio en Twitter: análisis de contenido de los tuits sobre migrantes y refugiados en español. Revista Española De Investigaciones Sociológicas, (172), 21-40. https://doi.org/10.5477/cis/reis.172.21
Arendt, F. (2023). Media stereotypes, prejudice, and preference-based reinforcement: toward the dynamic of self-reinforcing effects by integrating audience selectivity. Journal of Communication, 73(5), 463-475. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqad019
Association of Internet Researchers. (2019). Internet research: Ethical guidelines 3.0. https://aoir.org/reports/ethics3.pdf
Baggini, J. (2017). A short history of truth: Consolations for a post-truth world. Quercus Publishing.
Bakir, V., & McStay, A. (2018). Fake news and the economy of emotions: Problems, causes, solutions. Digital journalism, 6(2), 154-175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106633
Barberá, P., Jost, J.T., Nagler, J., Tucker, J.A., & Bonneau, R. (2015). Tweeting from left to right: Is online political communication more than an echo chamber? Psychological Science, 26(10), 1531-1542. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615594620
Baribi-Bartov, S., Swire-Thompson, B., & Grinberg, N. (2024). Supersharers of fake news on Twitter. Science, 384(6699), 979-982. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adl4435
Bartlett, J., Birdwell, J., & Froio, C. (2012). Populism in Europe: CasaPound. Open Society Foundations.
Berry, M., Garcia-Blanco, I., & Moore, K. (2015). Press coverage of the refugee and migrant crisis in the EU: A content analysis of five European countries. United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. https://www.unhcr.org/sites/default/files/legacy-pdf/56bb369c9.pdf
Bhatia, K. V. (2018). Mediating Religious Literacy: Designing a Critical Media Education Pedagogy for Schools in Villages of Ahmedabad [Doctoral dissertation]. Mudra Institute of Communications. http://ir.mica.ac.in/handle/123456789/4592
Bonacich, P. (1987). Power and centrality: A family of measures. American Journal of Sociology, 92(5), 1170-1182. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2780000
Brandes, U. (2001). A faster algorithm for betweenness centrality. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 25(2), 163-177. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/A:1014053902929
Budhwani, H., & Sun, R. (2020). Creating COVID-19 stigma by referencing the novel coronavirus as the “Chinese virus” on Twitter: Quantitative analysis of social media data. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22(5), e19301. https://doi.org/10.2196/19301
Calderón, C. A., de la Vega, G., & Herrero, D. B. (2020). Topic modeling and characterization of hate speech against immigrants on Twitter around the emergence of a far-right party in Spain. Social Sciences, 9(11), 188. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci9110188
Chapman, C. M., & Miller, D. S. (2020). From metaphor to militarized response: the social implications of “we are at war with COVID-19”–crisis, disasters, and pandemics yet to come. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 40(9/10), 1107-1124. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSSP-05-2020-0163
Charteris-Black, J. (2006). Britain as a container: Immigration metaphors in the 2005 election campaign. Discourse & Society, 17(5), 563-581. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926506066345
Chouliaraki, L., & Stolic, T. (2017). Rethinking media responsibility in the refugee ‘crisis’: A visual typology of European news. Media, Culture & Society, 39(8), 1162-1177. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443717726163
Chouliaraki, L., & Zaborowski, R. (2017). Voice and community in the 2015 refugee crisis: A content analysis of news coverage in eight European countries. International Communication Gazette, 79(6–7), 613-635. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048517727173
Cinelli, M., De Francisci Morales, G., Galeazzi, A., Quattrociocchi, W., & Starnini, M. (2021). The echo chamber effect on social media. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(9), e2023301118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2023301118
Clauset, A., Newman, M. E. J., & Moore, C. (2004). Finding community structure in very large networks. Physical Review E, 70(6). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.70.066111
Crawley, H., & Skleparis, D. (2018). Refugees, migrants, neither, both: Categorical fetishism and the politics of bounding in Europe’s “migration crisis.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 44(1), 48-64. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2017.1348224
d'Ancona, M. (2017). Post Truth: The New War on Truth and How to Fight Back. Ebury Press.
Demata, M. (2021) “Keeping the Threat Out. Trump’s Discourse, the Wall andthe ‘Other’”. Altre Modernità, (25), 270-286. https://doi.org/10.13130/2035-7680/15601
Engesser, S., Ernst, N., Esser, F., & Büchel, F. (2017). Populism and social media: How politicians spread a fragmented ideology. Information, communication & society, 20(8), 1109-1126. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1207697
Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51-58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
Ferrara, E., Chang, H., Chen, E., Muric, G., & Patel, J. (2020). Characterizing social media manipulation in the 2020 US presidential election. First Monday, 25(11). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v25i11.11431
Finchelstein, F. (2019). From fascism to populism in history. University of California Press.
Forti, S. (2021). Extrema derecha 2.0: qué es y cómo combatirla. Siglo XXI.
Forti, S. (2022). «Prima gli italiani!». Cambios y continuidades en la ultraderecha italiana. Revista CIDOB d'Afers Internacionals, (132), 25-48. https://doi.org/10.24241/rcai.2022.132.3.25
Freeman, L. C. (1979). Centrality in social networks: Conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1(3), 215-239. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/0378873379900418
Fruchterman, T. M. J., & Reingold, E. M. (1991). Graph drawing by force-directed placement. Software: Practice and Experience, 21(11), 1129-1164. Retrieved from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/spe.4380211102
Gamson, W. A., & Modigliani, A. (1989). Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructionist approach. American journal of sociology, 95(1), 1-37. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2780405
Garelli, G., & Tazzioli, M. (2021). Migration and ‘pull factor’traps. Migration studies, 9(3), 383-399. https://doi.org/10.1093/migration/mnaa027
Georgiou, M., & Zaborowski, R. (2017). Media coverage of the "refugee crisis": A cross-European perspective. Council of Europe. https://rm.coe.int/1680706b00
Giddens, A. (1979). Central Problems in Social Theory. Red Globe Press.
Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360-1380. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2776392
Griffin, R. (2010). Modernismo y fascismo: la sensación de comienzo bajo Mussolini y Hitler. Ediciones Akal.
Habermas, J. (1981). Teoría de la acción comunicativa, I. Taurus Humanidades.
Hall, K., & Cappella, J. N. (2008). Echo chamber: Rush Limbaugh and the conservative media establishment. Oxford University Press.
Human Rights Watch. (2024). World Report 2024: Italy. Human Rights Watch. https://www.hrw.org/world-report/2024/country-chapters/italy
Huysmans, J. (2000). The European Union and the securitization of migration. JCMS: Journal of common market studies, 38(5), 751-777. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5965.00263
Ibrahim, M. (2005). The securitization of migration: A racial discourse. International migration, 43(5), 163-187. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2435.2005.00345.x
International Organization for Migration (IOM). (2021). World Migrations Report 2020. International Organization for Migration. https://publications.iom.int/system/files/pdf/wmr_2020.pdf
Khatua, A., & Nejdl, W. (2022, May). Unraveling social perceptions & behaviors towards migrants on Twitter. In Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (Vol. 16, pp. 512-523). https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v16i1.19311
Khosravinik, M. (2010). The representation of refugees, asylum seekers and immigrants in British newspapers: A critical discourse analysis. Journal of language and Politics, 9(1), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.9.1.01kho
Klinger, U., Kreiss, D., & Mutsvairo, B. (2023). Platforms, power, and politics: An introduction to political communication in the digital age. John Wiley & Sons.
Krzyżanowski, M. (2018). ‘We are a small country that has done enormously lot’: The ‘refugee crisis’ and the hybrid discourse of politicizing immigration in Sweden. Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies, 16(1–2), 97-117. https://doi.org/10.1080/15562948.2017.1317895
Laclau, E. (2009). La razón populista. Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Lahav, G., & Messina, A. M. (2024). Framing and reframing immigration. In G. Lahav & A. M. Messina (Eds.), Immigration, security, and the liberal state (pp. 30-93). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009298001.003
Lamont, M., & Molnár, V. (2002). The study of boundaries in the social sciences. Annual Review of Sociology, 28(1), 167-195. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.28.110601.141107
Logie, C. H. (2020). Lessons learned from HIV can inform our approach to COVID-19 stigma. Journal of the International AIDS Society, 23(5), e25504. https://doi.org/10.1002/jia2.25504
Lucchesi, D., & Cerase, A. (2022). The Criminalization of NGOs: Shifting the Blame (and the Gaze) from Immigrants to Rescuers. CADAAD Journal, 14(2), 41-76. https://doi.org/10.21827/cadaad.14.2.41619
Messing, V., & Bocsák, A. (2020). Still divided but more open: Mapping European attitudes towards migration before and after the migration crisis. Friedrich Ebert Stiftung.
Moffitt, B. (2016). The global rise of populism: Performance, political style, and representation. Stanford University Press.
Mudde, C. (2017). Populism: A Very Short Introduction.
Nasuto, A., & Rowe, F. (2024). Understanding anti-immigration sentiment spreading on Twitter. PloS one, 19(9). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0307917
Newman, E., & Van Selm, J. (2003). Refugees and forced displacement: International Security, Human Vulnerability, and the State. UNU Press.
Newman, M., & Girvan, M. (2004). Finding and evaluating community structure in networks. Physical Review E, 69(2), 026113. Retrieved from https://journals.aps.org/pre/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevE.69.026113
Papacharissi, Z. (2015). Affective publics: Sentiment, technology, and politics. Oxford University Press.
Pariser, E. (2011). The filter bubble: What the Internet is hiding from you. Penguin.
Pons, P., & Latapy, M. (2005). Computing communities in large networks using random walks. In P. Yolum, T. Güngör, F. Gürgen, & C. Özturan (Eds.), Computer and Information Sciences - ISCIS 2005. ISCIS 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Vol. 3733). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/11569596_31
Romesburg, H. C. (1984). Cluster analysis for researchers. Lifetime Learning Publications.
Rowe, F., Mahony, M., Graells-Garrido, E., Rango, M., & Sievers, N. (2021). Using Twitter to track immigration sentiment during early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic. Data & Policy, 4, e36. https://doi.org/10.1017/dap.2022.5
Russell, F. M., Hendricks, M. A., Choi, H., & Stephens, E. C. (2015). Who sets the news agenda on Twitter? Journalists' posts during the 2013 US government shutdown. Digital Journalism, 3(6), 925-943. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2014.995918
Segev, E. (2020). Textual network analysis: Detecting prevailing themes and biases in international news and social media. Sociology Compass, 14(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12779
Sunstein, C. (2001). Republic.com. Princeton University Press.
Tandoc, E., Wei Lim, Z., & Ling, R. (2018). Defining ‘Fake News’: A typology of scholarly definitions. Digital Journalism, 6(2), 137-153. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2017.1360143
Traverso, E., & Meyran, R. (2017). I nuovi volti del fascismo: Conversazione con Régis Meyran. Ombre corte.
Tucker, J. A., Guess, A., Barberá, P., Vaccari, C., Siegel, A., Sanovich, S., Stukal, D., & Nyhan, B. (2018). Social media, political polarization, and political disinformation: A review of the scientific literature. SSRN. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/Delivery.cfm/SSRN_ID3144139_code912830.pdf?abstractid=3144139&mirid=1
Van Dijk, T. (1997). Discourse as Structure and Process. Sage.
Van Dijk, T. A. (1991) Racism and the Press. Routledge.
Van Dijk, T. A. (2000). New (s) Racism: A discourse analytical approach. In Ethnic minorities and the media (pp. 33-49). Open University Press. https://hdl.handle.net/11245/1.203737
Van Gorp, B. (2005). Where is the frame? Victims and intruders in the Belgian press coverage of the asylum issue. European journal of communication, 20(4), 484-507. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323105058253
Vañó-Agulló, C., de-Gracia-Soriano, P., & Jareño-Ruiz, D. (2021). The Spanish Political Debate During the Covid-19 Pandemic: The Case of the Twitter Debate. In The International Research & Innovation Forum (pp. 495-502). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84311-3_45
Wall, M., Otis Campbell, M., & Janbek, D. (2017). Syrian refugees and information precarity. New media & society, 19(2), 240-254. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444815591967
Wetherell, C. (1998). Historical social network analysis. International review of social history, 43(S6), 125-144. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020859000115123
Wicke, P., & Bolognesi, M. M. (2020). Framing COVID-19: How we conceptualize and discuss the pandemic on Twitter. PloS one, 15(9), https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0306644
Wodak, R. (2015). The politics of fear: What right-wing populist discourses mean. SAGE Publications.
Wu, L., Morstatter, F., Carley, K. M., y Liu, H. (2019). Misinformation in social media: definition, manipulation, and detection. ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter, 21(2), 80-90. https://doi.org/10.1145/3373464.3373475
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2025 Carles Vañó-Agulló
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0.
Todas las publicaciones de la Revista Española de Sociología se realizarán bajo una licencia abierta Creative Commons de Reconocimiento 4.0 Internacional (CC BY 4.0). Dicha licencia establece que los autores son los poseedores de los derechos de propiedad intelectual de sus trabajos, que pueden redistribuirse a cambio de un reconocimiento adecuado. Para más información de la licencia Creative Commons, consultar aquí.
Una vez aceptado un artículo para su publicación, la Revista Española de Sociología solicitará al denominado "autor para la correspondencia" la aceptación de una licencia obligatoria Creative Commons incluida en un acuerdo o contrato de publicación.
