Seneca the Elder: on the Genre of the Controuersia

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23808/rel.v21i21.92718

Keywords:

Seneca the Elder; declamatio; controuersia; genre; intertextuality

Abstract

In his work Oratorum et Rhetorum Sententiae Diuisiones et Colores, Seneca the Elder provides a considerable amount of information about his understanding of the genre of the controuersia. An analysis of Contr. 1 praef. 12 and other passages allows us to appreciate the importance of pragmatic features for the definition of this genre, beyond the features that operate on a textual level. This outlook answers to a generic logic situated on the auctorial level. However, Seneca performs in his work an operation of
decontextualization and recontextualization of the extracts he has selected, establishing new relations among them that are unconnected to their original enunciative situation. The result is a shift of the relevance of the pragmatic level in favour of intertextual relations, understood in the current sense, as a phenomenon in the scope of reception and not in intentional allusion. This circumstance places the work as a recreation of the genre of controuersia in which Seneca, through different strategies related with the practice of declamation, assumes a major role as responsible for this conception.

References

Adiego, I. J. – Artigas, E. – Riquer, A. (eds.) (2005): Séneca el Viejo. vol I: Controversias. Libros I-V. vol. II: Controversias. Libros VI-X. Suasorias, Madrid, Gredos.

Beard, M. (1993): «Looking for Roman myth: Dumézil, declamation and the problems of definition», en Graf, F. (ed.), Mythos in Mythenloser Gesellschaft: Das Paradigma Roms, Berlin-Boston, De Gruyter, 44-64.

Berti, E. (2007): Scholasticorum studia. Seneca il Vecchio e la cultura retorica e letteraria della prima età imperiale, Pisa, Giardini.

Bonner S. F. (1949): Roman Declamation in the Late Republic and the Early Empire, Liverpool, Liverpool University Press.

Bornecque, H. (1967): Les déclamations et les déclamateurs d’après Sénèque le Père, Hildesheim, Olms. [1902]

Butler, S. (2002): The Hand of Cicero, London and New York, Routledge.

Cappello, O. (2020): «Nomination and Systematization in Seneca’s Controversiae» en Dinter, M. T., Guérin, C., Santos, M. M. (eds.), Reading Roman declamation: Seneca the Elder, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 87-111.

Fairweather, J. (1981): Seneca the Elder. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Fernández Corte, J. C. – González Marín, S. (2013): «Escritura e historia literaria en el Brutus», Emerita, 81(1), 1–29. <http://emerita.revistas.csic.es/index.php/emerita/article/view/1035> [25/03/2021]. https://doi.org/10.3989/emerita.2013.01.1221.

Guérin, Ch. (2015): «Extraction, remémoration et discontinuité dans les Controverses de Sénèque le père: du déclamateur au texte», en Morlet, S. (éd.), Lire en extraits. Lecture et production des textes, de l’Antiquité à la fin du Moyen Âge, Paris, PUPS, 53-71. <https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01198453/document> [25/03/2021].

Guérin, Ch. (2020): «Greek Declaimers, Roman Context: (De)constructing Cultural Identity in Seneca the Elder», en Dinter, M. T.– Guérin, C.– Santos, M. M. (eds.), Reading Roman declamation: Seneca the Elder, Oxford, Oxford Univ. Press, 57-86.

Håkanson, L. (ed.) (1989): L. Annaeus Seneca Maior oratorum et rhetorum sententiae, diuisiones, colores, Leipzig: Teubner.

Hanslik, R. (1933): «Munatius 30», en Pauly, A.– Wissowa, G. – Kroll, W. (eds.): Paulys Realencyclopädie der classischen Altertumswissenschaft (RE). XVI,1, Stuttgart, Alfred Druckenmüller, 545–551.

Huelsenbeck, B. (2018): Figures in the Shadows. The Speech of Two Augustan-Age Declaimers, Arellius Fuscus and Papirius Fabianus, Berlin-Boston, De Gruyter.

Imber, M. A. (2001): «Practised Speech: Oral and Written Conventions in Roman Declamation», en Watson, J. (ed.), Speaking Volumes: Morality and Literacy in the Greek and Roman World, Leiden, Brill, 199-216.

Kennedy, G. A. (1972): The Art of Rhetoric in the Roman World, 300 B.C.–A.D. 300. Princeton, University Press, 1972.

La Bua, G. (2010): «Aiebat se in animo scribere (Sen. Contr. 1 praef. 18): Writing in

Roman declamations», en Calboli Montefusco, L. (ed.), Papers on Rhetoric X, Roma, Herder, 183-199.

Lockyer, Ch. (1970): The Fiction of Memory and the Use of Written Sources: Convention and Practice in Seneca the Elder and other Authors. Diss. Princeton University.

Dinter, M. – Guérin, C.– Martinho, M. (eds.) (2020): Reading Roman Declamation. Seneca the Elder, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

Migliario, E. (2003): «Orientamenti ideologici e relazioni interpersonali fra gli oratori e i retori di Seneca il Vecchio», en Gualandri, I. y Mazzoli, G. (eds.): Gli Annei, Una famiglia nella storia e nella cultura di Roma imperiale, Atti del Convegno Internazionale (Milano-Pavia, 2000), Como, New Press, 101-114.

Peirano, I. (2012): The Rhetoric of the Roman Fake: Latin Pseudepigrapha in Context. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Peirano, I. (2013): «Non subripiendi causa sed palam mutuandi: Intertextuality and Literary Deviancy between Law, Rhetoric, and Literature in Roman Imperial Culture» The American Journal of Philology 134. 1, 83-100.

Peirano, I. (2019): Persuasion, Rhetoric and Roman Poetry, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Roth, C. L. (ed.) (1871): C. Suetoni Tranquilli quae supersunt Omnia, Leipzig, Teubner.

Schaeffer, J.-M. (1989): Qu’est-ce qu’un genre littéraire?, Paris, Seuil.

Sinclair, P. (1994): «Political Declensions in Latin Grammar and Oratory 55 BCE/ CE 39», Ramus, 23 (1-2), 92–109. <https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/ramus/article/abs/political-declensions-in-latin-grammar-and-oratory-55-bce-ce-39/07810C989CA44D0D2C111C7D56556A1A> [25/03/2021]. doi:10.1017/s0048671x0000240x

Spangenberg Yanes, E. (2012): «Discorsi già scritti e discorsi mai scritti: due distinte sfere di applicazione dei verbi recito e declamo», Res Publica Litterarum 35, 50-79. <http://digital.casalini.it/10.1400/229135> [25/03/2021]. DOI: 10.1400/229135

Steel, C. (2005): Reading Cicero: Genre and Performance in Late Republican Rome, London: Duckworth.

Sussman, L.A. (1978): The Elder Seneca, Leiden, Brill.

van Mal-Maeder, D. (2007): La fiction des Déclamations, Leiden-Boston, Brill.

Watkins, T. H. (2019): L. Munatius Plancus: Serving and Surviving in the Roman Revolution, London-New York, Routledge.

Published

2021-12-23

How to Cite

González Marín, S. (2021) “Seneca the Elder: on the Genre of the Controuersia”, Revista de Estudios Latinos, 21(21), pp. 25–48. doi: 10.23808/rel.v21i21.92718.

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Obs.: This plugin requires at least one statistics/report plugin to be enabled. If your statistics plugins provide more than one metric then please also select a main metric on the admin's site settings page and/or on the journal manager's settings pages.