The Congestorium artificiose memorie by Iohannes Host Romberch (Venetiis, 1520 y 1533): between scholasticism and humanism
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23808/rel.v20i0.87202Keywords:
Host; Romberch; Congestorium; Artificiosa memoria; Reuchlin; Hoogstraten.Abstract
From the very title of the text (Congestorium) the idea has imposed itself that Romberch’s Congestorium artificiose memorie is no more than a complex ccumulation
of materials about memory, from which only the doctrine concerning loci deserves to be rescued, to a large extent, because it serves to explain the texts of other authors who preceded him, like Publicius, and, like Dolce, those who followed him in the long history of the art of memory. And these are precisely the points with which this work will be concerned: first of all, to outline the context in which the work was composed; second, to specify the actual meaning of the term Congestorium from the influence of the humanist Iohannes Reuchlin; and third, to consider to what extent the use of classical sources and the recognized authority of authors such as Publicius, Petrus Ravennas and Reuchlin allow us to catch some glimpses of a humanistic sensibility in Romberch, beyond his close relationship with the inquisitor of Cologne, Hoogstraten.
Downloads
References
Fuentes
Cochlaeus, I. (1549): Commentaria Ioannis Cochlaei, de actis et scriptis Martini Lutheri Saxonis, apud s. Victorem prope Moguntiam, ex officina Francisci Behem typographi.
Dolce, L. (2001): Dialogo del modo di accrescere e conservar la memoria, a cura di Andrea Torre, Pisa, Scuola Normale Superiore.
Hoogstraten, I. (1518): Apologia secunda, Coloniae, ex oficina nostra Quenteliana.
Hoogstraten, I. (1523): Absoluta determinatio [...] de presbyteris publica fornicatione notatis, Coloniae, ex aedibus Conradi Caesarii.
Hutten, U. v. (1801): Epistolas II Ulrici ab Hutten ad Richardum Crocum, Lipsiae, typis Breitkopf.
Hutten, U. v. (1827): Hochstratus ovans. Dialogus festivissimus. Opera omnia, tomus sextus (dubia), Lipsiae, sumptibus J. C. Hinrichsii.
Nicolaus, S. (1510): Ludus artificialis oblivionis, Lipsiae.
Reuchlin, I. (1508): Liber congestorum de arte predicandi, Denkendorff, Phorce.
Reuchlin, I. (1518): Epistolae trium illustrium virorum ad Hermannum comitem Nuenarium, ex Borromago.
Romberch. I. (1519): Burchardus de Monte Sion. Veridica Terre Sancte regionumque
finitimarum ac in eis mirabilium descriptio, Venetiis.
Romberch, I. (1520a): Congestorium artificiose memorie, Venetiis, in edibus Georgii de Rusconibus.
Romberch, I. (1520b): Venerabilis D. Alberti Magni […] moralissima in Ethicen Arist. Commentaria per […] Io. Romberch de Kyrspe elimatissima atque ad unguem castigata, Venetiis, arte et impensis haeredum Octaviani Scoti.
Romberch, I. (1524): Malleus Ioannis Fabri […] in haeresim Lutheranam, Coloniae, apud Ioannem Soterem.
Romberch, I. (1525): Defensio regie assertionis contra Babylonicam captivitatem […] per Johanemm Rossensem Episcopum, Coloniae, in oficina […] Petri Quentel.
Romberch, I. (1531): Farrago miscellaneorum Conradi Wimpinae a Fagis, Coloniae, apud Io. Soterem.
Romberch, I. (1532), De idoneo verbi Dei ministro, (s. l.).
Rossellius, C. (1579): Thesaurus artificiosae memoriae, Venetiis, apud Antonium Paduanum.
Sotomayor, A. (1667): Indices librorum prohibitorum et expurgandorum novissimi, Madriti, ex typographeo Didaci Diaz, 1667.
Umhauser, C. (1901): Ars memorativa S. Thome, Ciceronis, Quintiliani, Petri Ravenne (1501), Numberge, per Ambrosium Hueber.
Estudios
Bianco, B. J. von (1856): Die alte Universität Köln und die spätem gelehrtenschulen dieser Stadt, Köln.
Martínez de Bujanda, J. (1990): Index de Roma: 1557, 1559, 1564, Librairie Droz.
Carruthers, M. (2008 [19901]): The book of Memory: A Study of Memory in Medieval Culture, Cambridge University Press
Carruthers, M. & Ziolkowski, J. M. (2002): The Medieval Craft of Memory. An Anthology of Texts and Pictures, Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Press.
Carruthers, M. (2006): «Rhetorica Memoria in Commentary and Practice», in The Rhetoric of Cicero in its Medieval and Renaissance Commentary, Virginia Cox & John O. Ward eds., Leiden, Brill, 2006.
Evans, G. R. (1985): «The Ars predicandi of Johannes Reuchlin (1455-1522)», Rhetorica 3(2), 99-104.
Graetz, H. (1867): Influence of Judaism on the Protestant Reformation, transl. by S. Tuska, Cincinnati.
Hajdu, H. (1936): Das mnemotechnische Schrifttum des Mittelalters, Budapest, Deutsches Institut der königl. Ung. Peter Pazmany Universität.
Löhr, G. M. (1947): «Die Akten der Provinzialkapitel der Teutonia von 1503 und 1520», Archivum fratrum praedicatorum, 17, 250-284.
López Muñoz, M. (2000): Fray Luis de Granada y la retórica, Universidad de Almería.
Mehl, J. V. (1991): Humanismus in Köln/Humanism in Cologne, Cologne-Weimar-Vienna, Bôhlau Verlag.
Meuthen, E. (1988): Kölner Universitätsgeschichte, Band I: Die alte Universität.Böhlau, Köln.
Merino, L. (2015): «La fortuna de la Artificiosa memoria sive Phoenix de Pedro de Rávena: entre el éxito y la retractatio», Cuadernos de Filología Clásica. Estudios latinos 35.2, 299-378.
Merino, L. (2020): «Un dominico en la estela de Reuchlin: el periplo italiano (1514-1520) de Iohannes Romberch», Archivum Fratrum Predicatorum, en prensa.
Nauert Jr., Ch. G. (1971): «Peter of Ravenna and the ‘Obscure men’ of Cologne: A Case of Pre-Reformation Controversy», Renaissance. Studies in Honor of Hans Baron, ed. Molho and Tedes, Illinois University, 607-640.
Nauert Jr., Ch. G. (1988): «Graf Hermann von Neuenahr and the limits of Humanism in Cologne», Historical Reflections/Réflexion Historiques 15 (1), 65-79.
Paulus, N. (1903): Die deutschen Dominikaner im Kampfe gegen Luther (1518-1563), Freiburg, Herder.
Petersen, H. (1995): Jacobus Hoogstraten gegen Johannes Reuchlin. Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte des Antijudaism im 16. Jahrhundert, Mainz, Zabern.
Plett, H. (2004): Rhetoric and Renaissance Culture, Berlin-New York, Walter de Gruyter.
Price, D. (2011): Johannes Reuchlin and the Campaign to Destroy Jewish Books, New York, Oxford University Press.
Quantin, J-L., & Molinier, A. & Petitmengin, P. & Szerwiniack, O. (1994): «Irénée de Lyon entre humanisme et Réforme. Les citations de l’Adversus haereses dans les controverses religieuses, de Johann Fabri à Martin Luther (1522-1527)», Recherches Augustiniennes et Patristiques 27, 131-185.
Rossi, P. (1993 [19831]): Art de la mémoire, traduite de l’italien par P. Vighetti, Grenoble, Jérome Millon.
Rossi, P. (2006 [1960: Clavis universalis]): Logic and the Art of Memory, translated by Stephen Clucas, Athlone Contemporary European Thinkers.
Rummel, E. (2002): The Case Against Johann Reuchlin: Religious and Social Controversy in Sixteenth-Century Germany, Toronto, University of Toronto Press.
Tavuzzi, M. (1990): Chrysostomus Javelli O.P. (ca. 1470-1538). A Biobibliographical essay: part I, Biography, in Angelicum, 67 (4), 467-482.
Tavuzzi, M. (1997): Prierias: The Life and Works of Silvestro Mazzolini da Prierio,1456-1527, Duke Monographs in Medieval and Renaissance Studies, number 16, Durham, Duke University Press.
Thompson, B. (1996): Humanist and Reformers: A History of the Renaissance and Reformation, Michigan-Cambridge, W. M. Eermand.
Vasoli, C. (1986): «Arte della memoria e predicazione», Lettere Italiane 38 (4) (Ottobre-Diciembre), 478-499.
Vasoli, C. (2007): «Il domenicano tedesco Host Romberch e il Congestorium artificiose memorie», en Dai cantieri della storia. Liber amicorum per Paolo Prodi, a cura di G. P. Brizzi e G. Olmi, Bologna, Clueb, 283-293.
Volkmann, L. (1929): Ars memorativa, Wien, Jahrbuch der Kunsthistorischen Sammlugen N. F. 3.
Yates, F.A. (2007): The Art of Memory, London, Pimlico (1966 1).
Zika, Ch. (2003): Exorcising Our Demons: Magic, Witchcraft, and Visual Culture in Early Modern, Leiden-Boston, Brill.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Revista de Estudios Latinos
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The originals published in the printed and electronic editions of this journal are the property of the Revista de Estudios Latinos and can be circulated as long as the original source and authorship is made clear in any reproduction, full or partial, of the same, and as long as this is not done for commercial purposes.