Los seres humanos en la toma de decisiones automatizada en el marco del RGPD y la Ley de IA

Autores/as

  • Anna Levitina Abogada especializada en tecnología, protección y privacidad de datos, y sistemas de toma de decisión automatizada (ADS); investigadora predoctoral, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB). https://orcid.org/0009-0004-9855-5334

Palabras clave:

supervisión humana, Reglamento General de Protección de Datos (RGPD), inteligencia artificial (IA), toma de decisiones automatizadas (ADM), Unión Europea (UE)

Resumen

Revista CIDOB d’Afers Internacionals, nº 138, pp.121-144
Cuatrimestral (octubre-diciembre 2024)
ISSN:1133-6595 | E-ISSN:2013-035X
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24241/rcai.2024.138.3.121

 

La supervisión humana es fundamental para evitar que las máquinas emitan juicios inadecuados sobre las personas a las que se dirigen las decisiones. Aunque el Reglamento General de Protección de Datos (RGPD) y la Ley de Inteligencia Artificial (IA) de la UE abordan esta cuestión, son insuficientes en los aspectos cualitativos y en la integración de supervisores humanos en los marcos de gobernanza. Este artículo examina los requisitos legales para la supervisión humana, analizando cómo estos se entrelazan con las obligaciones de rendición de cuentas de los responsables del despliegue de la toma de decisiones automatizada (ADM) y los derechos individuales. Se aboga por un enfoque más global que no solo incluya la supervisión humana, sino también la evaluación rigurosa y continua de la eficacia del control humano. Sin ello, la supervisión humana puede no proteger adecuadamente el impacto de la ADM en las personas afectadas.

Key words: human oversight, General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), artificial intelligence (AI), automated decision-making (ADM), accountability, European Union (EU)

Citas

AEPD-Agencia Española de Protección de Datos. «Evaluating human intervention in automated decisions», (4 de marzo de 2024) (en línea) [Fecha de consulta: 01.09.2024] https://www.aepd.es/en/press-and-communications/blog/evaluating-human-intervention-in-automated-decisions

Alexander, Veronika: Blinder, Collin y Zak, Paul J. «Why trust an algorithm? Performance, cognition, and neurophysiology». Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 89, (2018), p. 279-288. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.07.026

Almada, Marco. «Human Intervention in Automated Decision-Making». ICAIL '19: Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, (2019), p. 2-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3322640.3326699

Almada, Marco. «Automated Decision-Making as a Data Protection Issue». SSRN, (2021), p. 1-23 (en línea) [Fecha de consulta: 01.09.2024] https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3817472

Bauer, Kevin; Hinz, Oliver; van der Aalst, Wil y Weinhardt, Christof. «Expl(AI)n It to Me – Explainable AI and Information Systems Research». Business and Information Systems Engineering, vol. 63, (2021), p. 79-82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-021-00683-2

Berger, Armin; Hillebrand, Lars; Leonhard, David; Deußer, Tobias; Feliz de Oliveira, Thiago B. y Dilmaghani, Tim. «Towards Automated Regulatory Compliance Verification in Financial Auditing with Large Language Models». 2023 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData), (15-18 de diciembre de 2023), p. 4.626-4.635. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/BigData59044.2023.10386518

Berger, Benedikt; Adam, Martin; Rühr, Alexander y Benlian, Alexander. «Watch Me Improve: Algorithm Aversion and Demonstrating the Ability to Learn». Business and Information Systems Engineering, vol. 63, (2021), p. 55-68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-020-00678-5

Binns, Reuben y Veale, Michael. «Is that your final decision? Multi-stage profiling, selective effects, and Article 22 of the GDPR». International Data Privacy Law, vol. 11, n.º 4 (2021), p. 319-332. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/idpl/ipab020

Burton, Jason W.; Stein, Mari-Klara y Jensen, Tina Blegind. «A systematic review of algorithm aversion in augmented decision making». Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, vol. 33, n.º 2 (2019), p. 220-239. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.2155

Bygrave, Lee A. «Article 22: Automated individual decision-making, including profiling», en Kuner, Christopher; Bygrave, Lee A.; Docksey, Christopher y Dreachsler, Laura (eds.) The EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) – A Commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020, p. 531.

Custers, Bart y Heijne, Anne-Sophie. «The Right of Access in Automated Decision-Making: The Scope of Article 15(1)(h) GDPR in theory and practice». Computer Law and Security Review, vol. 46 (setembre de 2022) DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2022.105727

Christofi, Athena; Breuer, Jonas; Wauters, Ellen; Valcke, Peggy y Pierson, Jo. «Data protection, control and participation beyond consent - Seeking the views of data subjects in data protection impact assessments», en Kosta, Eleni; Leenes, Roland y Kamara, Irene (eds.) Research Handbook on EU Data Protection Law. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2022, p. 503-529.

Cobbe, Jennifer, Seng Ah Lee, Michelle y Singh, Jatinder. «Reviewable Automated Decision-Making: A Framework for Accountable Algorithmic Systems». FAccT '21: Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, (2021), p. 598-609. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3442188.3445921

Comité Europeo de Protección de Datos. «Coordinated Enforcement Action, Designation and Position of Data Protection Officers», (17 de enero de 2024) (en línea) [Fecha de consulta: 01.09.2024] https://www.edpb.europa.eu/our-work-tools/our-documents/other/coordinated-enforcement-action-designation-and-position-data_en

Crootof, Rebecca; Kaminski, Margot E. y Price II, William Nicholson. «Humans in the Loop». Vanderbilt Law Review, vol. 76, n.º 2 (2023), p. 429-510.

Custers, Bart y Heijne, Anne-Sophie. «The Right of Access in Automated Decision-Making: The Scope of Article 15(1)(h) GDPR in theory and practice». Computer Law and Security Review, (2022) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2022.105727

Dreyer, Stephan y Schulz, Wolfgang. «The General Data Protection Regulation and Automated Decision-making: Will it deliver?». Discussion Paper Ethics of Algorithms, n.º 5, Bertelsmann Stiftung, (2019) (en línea) DOI: https://doi.org/10.11586/2018018

Edwards, Lilian y Veale, Michael. «Enslaving the Algorithm: From a ‘Right to an Explanation’ to a ‘Right to Better Decisions’?». IEEE Security & Privacy, vol. 16, n.º 3 (2018), p. 46-54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/MSP.2018.2701152

Enarsson, Therese; Enqvist, Lena y Naarttijärvi, Markus. «Approaching the human in the loop – legal perspectives on hybrid human/algorithmic decision-making in three contexts». Information & Communications Technology Law, vol. 31, n.º 1 (2021), p. 123-153. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13600834.2021.1958860

Enqvist, Lena. «Human oversight in the EU artificial intelligence act: what, when and by whom?». Law, Innovation & Technology, vol. 15, n.º 2 (2023), p. 508-535. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17579961.2023.2245683

Grant, David Gray; Behrends, Jeff y Basl, John. «What we owe to decision-subjects: beyond transparency and explanation in automated decision-making». Philosophical Studies, (2023). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-023-02013-6 (en línea) [Fecha de consulta: 01.09.2024] https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11098-023-02013-6

Green, Ben. «The flaws of policies requiring human oversight of government algorithms». Computer Law & Security Review, vol. 45, (2022). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2022.105681 (en línea) [Fecha de consulta: 01.09.2024] https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0267364922000292?via%3Dihub

Kaminski, Margot E. y Malgieri, Gianclaudio. «Algorithmic impact assessments under the GDPR: Producing multi-layered explanations». International Data Privacy Law, vol. 11, n.º 2 (2021), p. 125-144. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/idpl/ipaa020

Kern, Christoph; Gerdon, Frederic; Bach, Ruben L.; Keusch, Florian y Kreuter, Frauke. «Humans versus machines: Who is perceived to decide fairer? Experimental evidence on attitudes toward automated decision-making». Patterns, vol. 3, n.º 10 (2022), p. 1-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2022.100591

Koivisto, Ida; Koulu, Riikka y Larsson, Stefan. «User accounts: How technological concepts permeate public law through the EU’s AI Act». Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, vol. 0, n.º 0 (2024). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1023263X241248469 [Fecha de consulta: 01.09.2024] https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1023263X241248469

Koulu, Riikka. «Proceduralizing control and discretion: Human oversight in artificial intelligence policy». Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, vol. 27, n.º 6 (2020), p. 720-735. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1023263X20978649

Kyriakou, Kyriakos y Otterbacher, Jahna. «In humans, we trust». Discover Artificial Intelligence, vol. 3, n.º 44 (2023), p. 1-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44163-023-00092-2

Lazcoz, Guillermo y De Hert, Paul. «Humans in the GDPR and AIA governance of automated and algorithmic systems. Essential pre-requisites against abdicating responsibilities». VUB Brussels Privacy Hub Working Paper, vol. 8, n.º 32 (2022), p. 1-28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4016502

Logg, Jennifer M.; Minson, Julia A. y Moore Don A. «Algorithm appreciation: people prefer algorithmic to human judgment». Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, vol. 151, (2019), p. 90-103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2018.12.005

Lynskey, Orla. «Regulating for the Future: The Law’s Enforcement Deficit». Studies: An Irish Quarterly Review, vol. 112, n.º 445 (2023), p. 104-119. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/stu.2023.0007

Mahieu, René L. P. y Ausloos, Jef. «Recognising and Enabling the Collective Dimension of the GDPR and the Right of Access». Law Archive Papers, (29 de abril de 2020a), p. 3-38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31228/osf.io/b5dwm

Mahieu, René L. P. y Ausloos, Jef. «Harnessing the collective potential of GDPR access rights: towards an ecology of transparency». Internet Policy Review, (6 de julio de 2020b) (en línea) [Fecha de acceso: 01.09.2024] https://policyreview.info/articles/news/harnessing-collective-potential-gdpr-access-rights-towards-ecology-transparency/1487

Malgieri, Gianclaudio. «‘Just’ Algorithms: Justification (Beyond Explanation) of Automated Decisions Under the General Data Protection Regulation». Law and Business, vol. 1, n.º 1 (2021), p. 16-28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/law-2021-0003

Mantelero, Alexander. Beyond Data Human Rights, Ethical and Social Impact Assessment in AI. La Haya: T.M.C Asser Press, 2022.

Mendoza, Isak y Bygrave, Lee A. «The Right not to be Subject to Automated Decisions based on Profiling», en: Synodinou, Tatiana-Eleni; Jougleux, Philippe; Markou, Christina y Prastitou, Thalia (eds.) EU Internet Law: Regulation and Enforcement. Cham: Springer, 2017, p. 77-98.

Misuraca, Gianluca y van Noordt, Colin. «AI Watch: Artificial Intelligence in public services, EUR 30255 EN». Publications Office of the European Union, (2020). DOI: https://doi.org/10.2760/039619, JRC120399

Novelli, Claudio; Taddeo, Mariarosaria y Floridi, Luciano. «Accountability in artificial intelligence: what it is and how it works». AI & Society, vol. 39, (2024), p. 1.871-1.882. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-023-01635-y

Parlamento Europeo. «Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2024 laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence and amending Regulations (EC) No 300/2008, (EU) No 167/2013, (EU) No 168/2013, (EU) 2018/858, (EU) 2018/1139 and (EU) 2019/2144 and Directives 2014/90/EU, (EU) 2016/797 and (EU) 2020/1828 (Artificial Intelligence Act) (Text with EEA relevance)». Official Journal of the European Union, L series, 2024/1689, (12 de julio de 2024) (en línea) http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1689/oj

Roig, Antoni. «Safeguards for the right not to be subject to a decision based solely on automated processing (Article 22 GDPR)». European Journal of Law and Technology, vol. 8, n.º 3 (2017), p. 1-17 (en línea) https://ejlt.org/index.php/ejlt/article/view/570

Roig, Antoni. Las garantías frente a las decisiones automatizadas. Del Reglamento General de Protección de Datos a la gobernanza algorítmica. Barcelona: J.M. Bosch, 2020.

Rovatsos, Michael; Mittelstadt, Brent y Koene, Ansgar. «Landscape Summary: Bias in Algorithmic Decision-Making: What is bias in algorithmic decision-making, how can we identify it, and how can we mitigate it?». UK Government, Research and analysis, (19 de julio de 2019) (en línea) [Fecha de consulta: 01.09.2024] https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/landscape-summaries-commissioned-by-the-centre-for-data-ethics-and-innovation

Sartor, Giovanni y Lagioia, Francesca. «The impact of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) on artificial intelligence». Panel for the Future of Science and Technology (STOA), (25 de junio de 2020) (en línea) [Fecha de consulta: 01.09.2024] https://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document/EPRS_STU(2020)641530

Schmidt, Philipp; Biessmann, Felix y Teubner, Timm. «Transparency and trust in artificial intelligence systems». Journal of Decision Systems, vol. 29, n.º 4 (2020), p. 260-278. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/12460125.2020.1819094

Selbst, Andrew D. y Powles, Julia. «Meaningful information and the right to explanation». International Data Privacy Law, vol. 7, n.º 4 (2017), p. 233-242. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/idpl/ipx022

Sivan-Sevilla, Ido. «Varieties of enforcement strategies post-GDPR: a fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) across data protection authorities». Journal of European Public Policy, vol. 31, n.º 2 (2024), p. 552-585. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2022.2147578

Sterz, Sarah; Baum, Kevin; Biewer, Sebastian; Hermanns, Holger; Lauber-Rönsberg, Anne; Meinel, Philip y Langer, Markus. «On the quest for effectiveness in human oversight: Interdisciplinary perspectives». FAccT '24: Proceedings of the 2024 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, (2024), p. 2.495-2.507. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3630106.3659051

Tsamados, Andreas; Floridi, Luciano y Taddeo, Mariarosaria. «Human control of AI systems: from supervision to teaming». AI Ethics, (2024). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-024-00489-4

Wagner, Ben. «Liable, but Not in Control? Ensuring Meaningful Human Agency in Automated Decision‐Making Systems». Policy and Internet, vol. 11, n.º 1 (2019), p. 104-122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.198

Wieringa Maranke. «“Hey SyRI, tell me about algorithmic accountability”: Lessons from a landmark case». Data & Policy, vol. 5, (2023), p. 1-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/dap.2022.39

WP251, European Data Protection Board. «Guidelines on Automated individual decision-making and Profiling for the purposes of Regulation 2016/679», 17/EN WP251rev.01, (3 de octubre de 2017) (en línea) [Fecha de acceso: 01.09.2024] https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/article29/items/612053/en

Yeung, Karen. «Algorithmic Regulation: A Critical Interrogation». Regulation and Governance, vol. 12, n.º 4 (2018), p. 505-523. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12158

Descargas

Publicado

2025-01-07

Cómo citar

Levitina, A. (2025). Los seres humanos en la toma de decisiones automatizada en el marco del RGPD y la Ley de IA. Revista CIDOB d’Afers Internacionals, (138), 121–144. Recuperado a partir de https://recyt.fecyt.es/index.php/cidob/article/view/112020