CLIL lesson planning in Education student teachers: a case study

Main Article Content

Magdalena Custodio-Espinar
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5314-1606
José Manuel García Ramos
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5623-0900

Abstract

Content and language integrated learning (CLIL) approach, introduced by the European Union to promote the teaching of foreign languages and second languages, requires adequate training of future CLIL teachers. This pretest-posttest study analyses the competence to plan CLIL lessons of a sample of students in pre-primary and primary education degrees before (N=56) and after (N=50) taking a CLIL course that is part of their studies. The objective is to analyze the effectiveness of the course by studying the differences between both groups with the CIPMA (Cuestionario de Integración de los Principios Metodológicos AICLE), a questionnaire, already validated, that specifically measures teachers' competence to plan CLIL lessons. These quantitative results were completed with an analysis of the CLIL lesson plannings that both groups designed as part of the course. From the quantitative analysis carried out, it can be deduced that both groups of students acquire the competence to plan their CLIL lessons and that, despite some differences found in some of the areas of their lesson plannings, the CLIL course provides them with the strategies to adapt the methodological principles of the approach to the idiosyncrasies of their respective educational stages. Despite the limitations of the study, it is concluded that the integration of methodological training in CLIL, together with linguistic training, in both pre-primary and primary education degrees, is effective and necessary for the acquisition of the basic knowledge to plan lessons under this approach.


 


Key words: pre-primary education, primary education, CLIL, lesson planning, higher education, training.

Article Details

How to Cite
Custodio-Espinar, M., & García Ramos, J. M. (2023). CLIL lesson planning in Education student teachers: a case study. Revista De Educación, 399, 39–77. https://doi.org/10.4438/1988-592X-RE-2023-399-561
Section
Research
Author Biography

Magdalena Custodio-Espinar, Universidad Pontificia Comillas

Doctora en Educación por la Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM), Departamento de Investigación y Psicología en Educación.

Profesora Asociada Doctora en Universidad Pontificia Comillas, Instituto de Idiomas y Departamento de Educacación, Métodos de Investigación y Evaluación. Facultad de Ciencias Humanas y Sociales.