Utilizing professional relationships with at-risk children
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7179/PSRI_2024.45.09Keywords:
Educational principles, helping relationship, child at risk, pedagogical intervention, qualitative researchAbstract
A child can be considered at risk if their basic needs or not met or they are in danger of not having these needs met. Highly abnormal living conditions can directly harm personal development, learning, and integration into society. Working with at-risk children requires various educational approaches whose successful implementation depends greatly on the expertise of the personnel involved. This work aims to evaluate the use of relationship and educators’ understanding of it in interventions. To this end, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 26 teaching staff1 who work with children2 in various environments and organizations and subsequently analysed using open coding followed by thematic analysis. Interviews were conducted with eight children’s home educators, eight counsellors and therapists, and ten elementary school teachers. Significant aspects of the understanding and use of relationship-building were identified which, while differing based on the focus of the contributors, demonstrated that relationship-building was the common denominator in all successful interventions in education and re-education.
Downloads
References
Armellini, A, & De Stefani, M. (2016). Social presence in the 21st century: An adjustment to the Community of Inquiry framework. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(6), 1202–1216. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12302
AVSP. (2020). Náplň práce sociálního pedagoga v základní škole. Zlín: Asociace vzdělavatelů v sociální pedagogice.
Barcalová, M., Hořejšová, P., Dolezalova, P., & Bajgarová, Z. (2022). Psychoterapie pro školství. In Z. Bajgarová (Ed.), Škola – hrozba či příležitost pro zranitelné jedince (pp. 121–147). Jihočeská univerzita v Českých Budějovicích, Pedagogická fakulta.
Berger, L. M., & Font, S. A. (2015). The Role of the Family and Family-Centered Programs and Policies. The Future of Children, 25(1), 155–176. https://doi.org/10.1353/foc.2015.0007
Bergin C. (2018). Designing a prosocial classroom: fostering collaboration in students from preK-12 with the curriculum you already use. W.W. Norton & Company.
Borg, E., & Drange, I. (2019). Interprofessional collaboration in school: Effects on teaching and learning. Improving Schools, 22(3), 251–266. https://doi.org/10.1177/1365480219864812
Bozkurt, A., Jung, I., Xiao, J., Vladimirschi, V., Schuwer, R., Egorov, G., Lambert, S. R., Al-Freih, M., Pete, J., Olcott, Jr., D. Rodes, V., Aranciaga, I., Bali, M., Alvarez, Jr., A. V., Roberts, J., Pazurek, A., Raffaghelli, J. E., Panagiotou, N., de Coëtlogon, P., Shahadu, S., Brown, M., Asino, T. I. Tumwesige, J., Ramírez Reyes, T., Barrios Ipenza, E., Ossiannilsson, E., Bond, M., Belhamel, K., Irvine, V., Sharma, R. C., Adam, T., Janssen, B., Sklyarova, T., Olcott, N. Ambrosino, A., Lazou, C., Mocquet, B., Mano, M., & Paskevicius, M. (2020). A global outlook to the interruption of education due to COVID-19 pandemic: Navigating in a time of uncertainty and crisis. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 1-126. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3778083
Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77-101 http://dx.doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Brend, D. M., & Collin-Vézina, D. (2021). Stronger together: Workplace social support among residential child welfare professionals. Child Abuse & Neglect, 105302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2021.105302
Bučilová Kadlecová, J., Čáp, D., Gillernová, I., Housarová, B. (2010). Pedagogická intervence u žáků ZŠ. Praha: Wolters Kluwer ČR.
Castonguay, L. G. (1993). “Common factors” and “nonspecific variables”: Clarification of the two concepts and recommendations for research. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 3(3), 267–286. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0101171
Corbin, C. M., Alamos, P., Lowenstein, A. E., Downer, J. T., & Brown, J. L. (2019). The role of teacher-student relationships in predicting teachers’ personal accomplishment and emotional exhaustion. Journal of School Psychology, 77, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2019.10.001
Cornelius-White, J. (2007). Learner-centered teacher-student relationships are effective: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 77, 113–143. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298563
Collins, B. A., O’Connor, E. E., Supplee, L., & Shaw, D. S. (2016). Behavior problems in elementary school among lowincome boys: The role of teacher–child relationships. The Journal of Educational Research, 110(1), 72–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2015.1039113
Davies, H. (2019). Trust and Distrust: Listening to Children about Their Relationships with Professionals. Social Sciences, 8(9), 251. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci8090251¨
Dima, G., & Bucuţă, M. D. (2020). Introducing psychodrama into programmes preparing young people transitioning from residential care. Zeitschrift Für Psychodrama Und Soziometrie, 19(S1), 47–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11620-020-00562-0
Downer, J., Sabol, T. J., & Hamre, B. (2010). Teacher–Child Interactions in the Classroom: Toward a Theory of Within–and Cross-Domain Links to Children’s Developmental Outcomes. Early Education & Development, 21(5), 699–723. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2010.497453
Erol, D., & Savaş, Ö. (2022). at-risk children in the Preschool Period: Preschool Teachers’ Opinions. TED EĞİTİM ve BİLİM, 47(210). https://doi.org/10.15390/eb.2022.10815
Firestone, W. A., & Pennell, J. R. (1993). Teacher commitment, working conditions, and differential incentive policies. Review of Educational Research, 63, 489–525. https://doi.org/10.2307/1170498
Frauenholtz, S., & Mendenhall, A. N. (2020). “They’ll Give You a Second Chance”: Perceptions of Youth and Caregivers Regarding Their Experiences in a Community-Based Mental Health System of Care. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 37(5), 477–485. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10560-020-00654-8
Frelin, A. (2010). Teachers’ relational practices and professionality. Uppsala: Institutionen för didaktik, Uppsala universitet.
Frelin, A., & Fransson, G. (2017) Four components that sustain teachers’ commitment to students – a relational and temporal model, Reflective Practice, 18(5), 641-654. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2017.1307722
Gandhi, J., Watts, T. W., Masucci, M. D., & Raver, C. C. (2020). The Effects of Two Mindset Interventions on Low-Income Students’ Academic and Psychological Outcomes. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 13(2), 351–379. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2019.1711272
Gelso, C. J., & Carter, J. A. (1985). The real relationship in counseling and psychotherapy: Components,consequences, and theoretical antecedents. The Counseling Psychologist, 13, 155–244. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000085132001
Glasser, W. (2010). Reality Therapy: a New Approach to Psychiatry. Harpercollins E-Books.
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Routledge.
Gordon, T., & Burch, N. (2003). Teacher effectiveness training: the program proven to help teachers bring out the bestin students of all ages. Three Rivers Press.
Gu, Q. (2014). The role of relational resilience in teachers’ career-long commitment and effectiveness. Teachers and Teaching, 20, 502–529. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2014.937961
Gurr, D., Drysdale, L. and Goode, H. (2022). An open systems model of successful school leadership, Journal of Educational Administration, 60(1), 21-40. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-04-2021-0091
Hamre, B. K., & Pianta, R. C. (2001). Early teacher-child relationships and the trajectory of children’s school outcomes through eighth grade. Child Development, 72, 625. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00301
Hansen, D. T. (1998). The moral is in the practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 14, 643–655.
Hansen, D. T. (2001). Exploring the moral heart of teaching: Toward a teacher’s creed. Teachers College Press.
Jones, S. M., McGarrah, M. W., & Kahn, J. (2019). Social and Emotional Learning: A Principled Science of Human Development in Context. Educational Psychologist, 54(3), 129–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2019.1625776
Jones, S. M., Barnes, S. P., Bailey, R., & Doolittle, E. J. (2017). Promoting Social and Emotional Competencies in Elementary School. The Future of Children, 27(1), 49–72. https://doi.org/10.1353/foc.2017.0003
Kaim, Z., & Romi, S. (2015). Adolescents at risk and their willingness to seek help from youth care workers. Children and Youth Services Review, 53, 17–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2015.03.002
Kopřiva, K. (2016). Lidský vztah jako součást profese. Portál.
Kourkoutas, E., Eleftherakis, T. G., Vitalaki, E., & Hart, A. (2015). Family-School-Professionals Partnerships: An Action Research Program to Enhance the Social, Emotional, and Academic Resilience of at-risk children. Journal of Education and Learning, 4(3). https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v4n3p112
Kross, E., Ong, M., & Ayduk, O. (2023). Self-Reflection at Work: Why It Matters and How to Harness Its Potential and Avoid Its Pitfalls. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 10(1), 441–464. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031921-024406
Kubíčková, H. (2020). Specifika příbuzenské pěstounské péče v kontextu transgenerační psychické zátěže v rodině. Sociální pedagogika/SocialEducation, 8(2), 84–99. https://doi.org/10.7441/soced.2020.08.02.06
Lalayants, M. (2013). Multidisciplinary Collaboration in Child Protective Clinical Consultations: Perceptions of Best Practices. Journal of Public Child Welfare, 7(3), 253–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/15548732.2013.798245
Lefevre, M., Hickle, K., Luckock, B., & Ruch, G. (2017). Building Trust with Children and Young People at Risk of Child Sexual Exploitation: The Professional Challenge. The British Journal of Social Work, 47(8), 2456–2473. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcw181
Lochmiller, C. (2021). Conducting Thematic Analysis with Qualitative Data. The Qualitative Report, 26(6). https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2021.5008
Loughhead, M., Guy, S., Furber, G., & Segal, L. (2017). Consumer views on youth-friendly mental health services in South Australia. Advances in Mental Health, 16(1), 33–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/18387357.2017.1360748
Luckner, A. E., & Pianta, R. C. (2011). Teacher–student interactions in fifth grade classrooms: Relations with children’s peer behavior. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 32(5), 257–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2011.02.010
Mallonee, J., Petros, R., & Solomon, P. (2022). Explaining engagement in outpatient therapy among adults with serious mental health conditions by degree of therapeutic alliance, therapist empathy, and perceived coercion. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 45(1), 79–88. https://doi.org/10.1037/prj0000490
McKinnon, R. D., Friedman-Krauss, A., Roy, A. L., & Raver, C. C. (2018). Teacher–child relationships in the context of poverty: the role of frequent school mobility. Journal of Children and Poverty, 24(1), 25–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/10796126.2018.1434761
McCoy, D. C., Gonzalez, K., & Jones, S. (2019). Preschool Self-Regulation and Preacademic Skills as Mediators of the Long-Term Impacts of an Early Intervention. Child Development, 90(5), 1544–1558. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13289
Mcwhirter, J., J., & Al, E. (2013). At-risk youth: a comprehensive response: for counselors, teachers, psychologists, and human service professionals. Brooks/Cole, Cengage Learning.
Miruktamov, F., & Makhamatov, M. (2020). Factors of occurrence of at-risk children and their psychological characteristics. European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine, 7(2), 1688–1696.
Mmusi, F. I., & van Breda, A. D. (2017). Male care-leavers’ transfer of social skills from care into independent living in South Africa. Children and Youth Services Review, 81, 350–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2017.08.024
Mösler, T., Poppek, S., Leonhard, C., & Collet, W. (2022). Reflective Skills, Empathy, Wellbeing, and Resilience in Cognitive-Behavior Therapy Trainees Participating in Mindfulness-Based Self-Practice/Self-Reflection. Psychological Reports, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/00332941221094482
Murray, C., & Zvoch, K. (2010). Teacher—Student Relationships Among Behaviorally At-Risk African American Youth From Low-Income Backgrounds: Student Perceptions, Teacher Perceptions, and Socioemotional Adjustment Correlates. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 19(1), 41–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/1063426609353607
Nerantzi, C., Chatzidamianos, G., Stathopoulou, H. & Karaouza, E. (2021). Human Relationships in Higher Education: The Power of Collaboration, Creativity and Openness. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2021(1), 26. http://doi.org/10.5334/jime.668
Norcross, J. C., & Wampold, B. E. (2011). Evidence-based therapy relationships: Research conclusions and clinical practices. Psychotherapy, 48(1), 98–102. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022161
Obegi, J. (2008). The development of the client-therapist bond through the lens of attachment theory. Psychotherapy Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 45(4), 431–446. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014330
O’Connor, S., Kivlighan, D. M., Hill, C. E., & Gelso, C. J. (2019). Therapist–client agreement about their working alliance: Associations with attachment styles. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 66(1), 83–93. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000303
Olivier, E., & Archambault, I. (2017). Hyperactivity, inattention, and student engagement: The protective role of relationships with teachers and peers. Learning and Individual Differences, 59, 86–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2017.09.007
Paccaud, A., Keller, R., Luder, R., Pastore, G., & Kunz, A. (2021). Satisfaction With the Collaboration Between Families and Schools – The Parent’s View. Frontiers in Education, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.646878
Parmenter, L., & Robertson, N. (2022). Student perspectives on good university teachers: communication, clarity, commitment, care. European Journal of Engineering Education, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2022.2073435
Prewett, S. L., Bergin, D. A., & Huang, F. L. (2018). Student and teacher perceptions on student-teacher relationship quality: A middle school perspective. School Psychology International, 40(1), 66–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034318807743
Rauh, H. (2005). The ‚at-risk‘ concept. In B. Hopkins (Eds.), The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Child Development (pp. 393–395). Cambridge University Press.
Raver, C. C., Garner, P. W., & Smith-Donald, R. (2007). The roles of emotion regulation and emotion knowledge for children’s academic readiness: Are the links causal? In R. C. Pianta, M. J. Cox, & K. L. Snow (Eds.), School readiness and the transition to kindergarten in the era of accountability (pp. 121–147). Paul H Brookes Publishing.
Rollins, W. (2020). Social worker–client relationships: Social worker perspectives. Australian Social Work, 73(4), 395–407. https://doi.org/10.1080/0312407X.2019.1669687
Sammons, P., Day, C., Kington, A., Gu, Q., Stobart, G., & Smees, R. (2007). Exploring variations in teachers’ work, lives and their effects on pupils: Key findings and implications from a longitudinal mixedmethod study. British Educational Research Journal, 33, 681–701.
Schüller, A., Bienioschek, S., & Kölch, M. (2022). Interventionen für Kinder und Jugendliche, die in Pflegefamilien oder Jugendhilfeeinrichtungen leben – ein systematisches Review. Praxis Der Kinderpsychologie Und Kinderpsychiatrie, 71(1), 23–38. https://doi.org/10.13109/prkk.2022.71.1.23
Spivak, A. L., & Farran, D. C. (2012). First-Grade Teacher Behaviors and Children’s Prosocial Actions in Classrooms. Early Education & Development, 23(5), 623–639. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2011.566164
Tosto, M. G., Asbury, K., Mazzocco, M. M. M., Petrill, S. A., & Kovas, Y. (2016). From classroom environment to mathematics achievement: The mediating role of self-perceived ability and subject interest. Learning and Individual Differences, 50, 260–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.07.009
Tschuschke, V., Koemeda-Lutz, M., von Wyl, A., Crameri, A., & Schulthess, P. (2021). The Impact of Clients’ and Therapists’ Characteristics on Therapeutic Alliance and Outcome. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10879-021-09527-2
Tschuschke, V., Koemeda-Lutz, M., von Wyl, A., Crameri, A., & Schulthess, P. (2020). The Impact of Patients’ and Therapists’ Views of the Therapeutic Alliance on Treatment Outcome in Psychotherapy. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 208(1), 56–64. https://doi.org/10.1097/nmd.0000000000001111
Wang, M.-T., Brinkworth, M., & Eccles, J. (2013). Moderating effects of teacher–student relationship in adolescent trajectories of emotional and behavioral adjustment. Developmental Psychology, 49(4), 690–705. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027916
Watts, T. W., Ibrahim, D., Khader, A., Li, C., Gandhi, J., & Raver, C. (2020). Exploring the Impacts of an Early Childhood Educational Intervention on Later School Selection. Educational Researcher, 49(9), 667–677. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X20935060
Watts, T. W., Gandhi, J., Ibrahim, D. A., Masucci, M. D., & Raver, C. C. (2018). The Chicago School Readiness Project: Examining the long-term impacts of an early childhood intervention. Plos One, 13(7), e0200144. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200144
Werbart, A., Hägertz, M., & Borg Ölander, N. (2018). Matching Patient and Therapist Anaclitic–Introjective Personality Configurations Matters for Psychotherapy Outcomes. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 48(4), 241–251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10879-018-9389-8
Whittingham, K., & Coyne, L. W. (2019). Therapeutic relationship. Acceptance and Commitment Therapy, 131–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-814669-9.00006-0
Wubbels, T., Brekelmans, M., den Brok, P., Wijsman, L., Mainhard, T., & van T. Jan. (2015). Teacher-student relationships and classroom management. In E. Emmer & E. Sabornie (Eds.), Handbook of classroom management (2nd ed.). Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright and right to archive
The published version of the articles can be self-archived by their authors in open access institutional and thematic repositories. However, Pedagogía Social. Revista Interuniversitaria must authorize partial or global reutilisation on new papers or publications.
Published papers must be cited including the title of the journal Pedagogía Social. Revista Interuniversitaria, issue, pages and year of publication
Ethical responsibilities
Pedagogía Social. Revista Interuniversitaria does not accept any material that has been previously published in other documents or publications. Authors are responsible for obtaining the required permissions for partial or global reproduction any material from other publications, and to correctly quote its origin.
Pedagogía Social. Revista Interuniversitaria is obliged to detect and report fraudulent practices.
Only those who have intellectually contribute to the development of the paper must appear as authors.
The journal expects authors to declare any commercial partnership that might entail a conflict of interest with respect to the submitted article.
Authors must mention in the article, preferably in the “methodology” section, that the procedures used during the samplings and controls have been made after getting informed consent.
The journal will not use any received contribution in a way other than the goals described in these guidelines.
Copyright Notice
© Pedagogía Social. Revista Interuniversitaria. Papers published in both the printed and online versions of this Journal are property of Pedagogia Social. Revista Interuniversitaria, being required to cite the source in any partial or total reproduction.
Unless otherwise stated, all content of this electronic journal is distributed under "Creative Commons Attribution-Non commercial 3.0 Spain" (CC-by-nc) license for use and distribution. The informative version and the legal text of this license is available here. This has to be expressly stated in this way when necessary.