From regionalism to nationalism by «the brute force of war». The impact of World War I in the thought of Blas Infante
Keywords:
Historical Andalucismo Movement, Blas Infante, World War I, nationalism, League of Nations, federalismAbstract
In 1919, in the wake of the political agenda of US President Wilson, Blas Infante, intellectual leader of Andalucista movement, wrote La Sociedad de Naciones («The League of Nations»). The book is an enthusiastic plea for a society of confederate nations reaching the aspirations of perpetual peace and universal fraternity. Surprisingly, this work has gone unnoticed by experts in the first stage of Andalucismo movement (first third of the twentieth century). We argue in this article that La Sociedad de Naciones is key to understanding and interpreting the so-called nationalist turn traditionally attributed to Andalucismo after World War I.Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Francisco Acosta Ramírez, Salvador Cruz Artacho
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors whose contributions are accepted for publication in this journal, accept the following terms:
a. The authors retain their copyright and guarantee to the magazine the right of first publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution License Attribution-Noncommercial-No derivative works 4.0 Spain, which allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and its first publication is indicated.
b. Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements to distribute the version of the published work (e.g. deposit in an institutional repository or archive, or published in a monographic volume) provided the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
PLAGIARISM AND SCIENTIFIC FRAUD
The publication of work that infringes on intellectual property rights is the sole responsibility of the authors, including any conflicts that may occur regarding infringement of copyright. This includes, most importantly, conflicts related to the commission of plagiarism and/or scientific fraud.
Plagiarism is understood to include:
1. Presenting the work of others as your own.
2. Adopting words or ideas from other authors without due recognition.
3. Not using quotation marks or another distinctive format to distinguish literal quotations.
4. Giving incorrect information about the true source of a citation.
5. The paraphrasing of a source without mentioning the source.
6. Excessive paraphrasing, even if the source is mentioned.
Practices constituting scientific fraud are as follows:
1. Fabrication, falsification or omission of data and plagiarism.
2. Duplicate publication.
3. Conflicts of authorship.
