Punta Europa and Atlántida: two responses to the teological politic (1956-1970)
Keywords:
Spain, traditionalism, secularization, Second Vatican Council, Franco regimeAbstract
From the last century mid-fifties, the Spanish society underwent a«creative destruction» process (Schumpeter) which combined economic development and considerable social transformation, with the Second Vatican Council theological politic significance. All those things contributed to questioning the legitimacy of the cultural, intellectual and religious bases of the politic regimen arose from the Civil War. In this scenario, the intelligentsia divided projects and both differing strategies. The first, personified by the Punta Europa magazine, bet for the continuity of traditional theological politic, namely, the religious regimen legitimacy. The second, represented by the Atlántida magazine team, expected drew up a project of modernist and neoconservative basis, which objective was harmonize the authoritarian political system with the new political, socioeconomic and religious situations.Downloads
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Pedro Carlos González Cuevas
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors whose contributions are accepted for publication in this journal, accept the following terms:
a. The authors retain their copyright and guarantee to the magazine the right of first publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution License Attribution-Noncommercial-No derivative works 4.0 Spain, which allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and its first publication is indicated.
b. Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements to distribute the version of the published work (e.g. deposit in an institutional repository or archive, or published in a monographic volume) provided the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
PLAGIARISM AND SCIENTIFIC FRAUD
The publication of work that infringes on intellectual property rights is the sole responsibility of the authors, including any conflicts that may occur regarding infringement of copyright. This includes, most importantly, conflicts related to the commission of plagiarism and/or scientific fraud.
Plagiarism is understood to include:
1. Presenting the work of others as your own.
2. Adopting words or ideas from other authors without due recognition.
3. Not using quotation marks or another distinctive format to distinguish literal quotations.
4. Giving incorrect information about the true source of a citation.
5. The paraphrasing of a source without mentioning the source.
6. Excessive paraphrasing, even if the source is mentioned.
Practices constituting scientific fraud are as follows:
1. Fabrication, falsification or omission of data and plagiarism.
2. Duplicate publication.
3. Conflicts of authorship.
