The Philippines in the Cortes of Cadiz
Keywords:
Philippines, nineteenth century, Cortes of Cadiz, Spanish Empire, Ventura de los Reyes, Philippine Political Life, Creoles, Manila GalleonAbstract
This paper analyzes the participation of the Philippines in the Cortes of Cadiz, through the actions of deputy Ventura de los Reyes, a Creole elected in representation of the council of Manila. Studies, first, the process by which the Philippines came to be represented in a parliament that brought together representatives from all over the empire. Analyzes, then, the reform plan for the archipelago that Reyes presented in the Cortes and the issues discussed by the sum of members in relation to the Philippines: proposals for Philippine trade after the end of the Manila Galleon and how that affected the commercial traffic of all the empire; the convenience, or not, of differentiating policies depending on the state of the provinces; the practical problems for incorporating Filipinos into the political life of the empire and the issues that hindered the establishment of equality among all the Spaniards of both hemispheres; debates on the organization of future elections, the groups that should participate in them and the type of representation that the Philippines could send to a common parliament. Finally, the paper closes by evaluating the impact that these issues had in the archipelago; the groups that felt represented by Ventura de los Reyes and the sectors that felt excluded; the struggle for political power evidenced behind the performances; and how those early political battles of the first decades of the nineteenth century were essential for the political renewal of the Philippines.Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 María Dolores Elizalde Pérez-Grueso

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors whose contributions are accepted for publication in this journal, accept the following terms:
a. The authors retain their copyright and guarantee to the magazine the right of first publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution License Attribution-Noncommercial-No derivative works 4.0 Spain, which allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and its first publication is indicated.
b. Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements to distribute the version of the published work (e.g. deposit in an institutional repository or archive, or published in a monographic volume) provided the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
PLAGIARISM AND SCIENTIFIC FRAUD
The publication of work that infringes on intellectual property rights is the sole responsibility of the authors, including any conflicts that may occur regarding infringement of copyright. This includes, most importantly, conflicts related to the commission of plagiarism and/or scientific fraud.
Plagiarism is understood to include:
1. Presenting the work of others as your own.
2. Adopting words or ideas from other authors without due recognition.
3. Not using quotation marks or another distinctive format to distinguish literal quotations.
4. Giving incorrect information about the true source of a citation.
5. The paraphrasing of a source without mentioning the source.
6. Excessive paraphrasing, even if the source is mentioned.
Practices constituting scientific fraud are as follows:
1. Fabrication, falsification or omission of data and plagiarism.
2. Duplicate publication.
3. Conflicts of authorship.



