Anti-industrialism in Spanish Social Catholicism, 1880-1936
Keywords:
España, Catolicismo Social, Anti-industrialismo, 1880-1936Abstract
The impersonal, conflicting and changing industrial world of big factories and large urban concentrations was initially difficult to reconcile with the Christian ideal (linked to the family and the small community, and associated with an ethical view of economic activities and a stable environment of close social relations, where values of brotherhood and mutual aid could easily blossom). However, as the industrial reality and the market were well consolidated and it was not possible to reverse, it was assumed the given situation, choosing to promote ways that would enable the Church to regain lost influence. This study analyzes the extent to which Spanish Social Catholicism was anti-industrialist between 1880 and 1936, examining the two aspects where the anti-industrialist bias could be more present: the attempt to restore a system of work organization and labour relations more harmonic (looking back to the medieval guilds), and the negative perception of the urban-industrial world, specially in relation to the problem of rural-urban migration.Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Tomás Martínez Vara, José Luis Ramos Gorostiza
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors whose contributions are accepted for publication in this journal, accept the following terms:
a. The authors retain their copyright and guarantee to the magazine the right of first publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution License Attribution-Noncommercial-No derivative works 4.0 Spain, which allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and its first publication is indicated.
b. Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements to distribute the version of the published work (e.g. deposit in an institutional repository or archive, or published in a monographic volume) provided the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
PLAGIARISM AND SCIENTIFIC FRAUD
The publication of work that infringes on intellectual property rights is the sole responsibility of the authors, including any conflicts that may occur regarding infringement of copyright. This includes, most importantly, conflicts related to the commission of plagiarism and/or scientific fraud.
Plagiarism is understood to include:
1. Presenting the work of others as your own.
2. Adopting words or ideas from other authors without due recognition.
3. Not using quotation marks or another distinctive format to distinguish literal quotations.
4. Giving incorrect information about the true source of a citation.
5. The paraphrasing of a source without mentioning the source.
6. Excessive paraphrasing, even if the source is mentioned.
Practices constituting scientific fraud are as follows:
1. Fabrication, falsification or omission of data and plagiarism.
2. Duplicate publication.
3. Conflicts of authorship.
