The use of EdPuzzle to learn polynomial factorization in Secondary Education
Main Article Content
Abstract
INTRODUCTION. One of the main objectives of Mathematics education is to motivate students since their interest in Mathematics is very low in many cases and, in others, even null. The use of different technologies has grown a lot in the last decades and several authors in the area have demonstrated their effectiveness in the classroom. In addition, the use of different Information and Communication Technologies, which students can use in their own homes, is also growing. METHOD. In this study, the use of the EdPuzzle application is presented, under the paradigm of the Flip Learning methodology in the third year of the Secondary Education Level for learning polynomial factorization in a school in Spain in two different courses, taught by the same teacher. To carry out the experience, the average grades of two exams have been taken, the first one related to polynomials and the basic concepts, used as a pretest since it has the main basic concepts that the student must know before continuing, and another related to the polynomial factorization, used as a posttest, and the scores obtained by the group that used EdPuzzle were compared
with those that did not use it. RESULTS. Comparison of both groups shows that the scores are significantly higher in the group that used EdPuzzle in the posttest. DISCUSSION. The Cohen’s d effect size obtained was almost medium, and the questionnaire answers were positive, aspects that make EdPuzzle a tool to be considered in the teaching-learning process of Mathematics.
Downloads
Article Details
References
Armsby, P. (2013). Developing professional learning and identity through the recognition of experiential learning at doctoral level. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 32(4), 412-429. https://doi.org/10.1080/02601370.2013.778070
Casillas, S., Cabezas, M., Ibarra, M. & Rodríguez, G. (2020). El profesorado universitario en la sociedad del conocimiento: manejo y actitud hacia las TIC. Bordón. Revista de Pedagogía, 72(3), 45-63. https://doi.org/10.13042/Bordon.2020.76746
Coa, R. E. (2018). Aprendizaje experiencial y el EdPuzzle en la solución de problemas contextualizados de sistemas de ecuaciones de matemática básica en estudiantes de una universidad privada 2018-I [Master´s Theses], Technological University of Perú. Lima. http://repositorio.utp.edu.pe/handle/UTP/1554
Cornell, R., Johnson, C. & Schwartz, J. W. (2013). Enhancing student experiential learning with structured interviews. Journal of Education for Business, 88(3), 136-146. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2012.659296
Cortina, J. L., Zúñiga, C. & Visnovska, J. (2013). La equipartición como obstáculo didáctico en la enseñanza de las fracciones. Educación Matemática, 25(2), 7-29.
Cronhjort, M., Filipsson, L. & Weurlander, M. (2017). Improved engagement and learning in flipped-classroom calculus. Teaching Mathematics and Its Applications, 37(3), 113-121. https://doi.org/10.1093/teamat/hrx007
Crouch, C. H. & Mazur, E. (2001). Peer instruction: ten years of experience and results. American Journal of Physics, 69(9), 970-977. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1374249
Curto, M., Orcos, L., Blázquez, P. J. & León, F. J. M. (2019). Student assessment of the use of Kahoot in the learning process of science and mathematics. Education Sciences, 9(1), 55.
Douady, R. (1986). Jeux de cadres et dialectique outil-objet. Recherches en Didactique des Mathématiques, 7(2), 5-31. https://revue-rdm.com/1986/jeux-de-cadres-et-dialectique/
Garzón, J. & Bautista, J. (2018). Virtual Algebra Tiles: a pedagogical tool to teach and learn algebra through geometry. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 34(6), 876-883.
Hamdan, N., McKnight, P., McKnight, K. & Arfstrom, K. M. (2013). The Flip Learning Model: a white paper based on the literature review of Flipped Learning. http://flippedlearning.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/WhitePaper_FlippedLearning.pdf
Hulse, T. (2019). Graspable Math K-12: perspectives and design for formative assessment of mathematical proficiency with learning technologies [Phd Thesis]. https://digital.wpi.edu/concern/etds/6q182n667
Jordán, C., Magreñán, Á. A. & Orcos, L. (2019). Considerations about flip education in the teaching of advanced mathematics. Education Sciences, 9(3), 227.
Kolb, A. Y. & Kolb, D. A. (2009). Experiential learning theory: a dynamic, holistic approach to management learning, education and development. In S. J. Armstrong & C. V. Fukami (eds.), The SAGE handbook of management learning, education and development, 42, 68. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9780857021038.n3
Margosian, K. (2018). Examining the effect of Flipped Learning on English language learner mathematics achievement. [Master´s Thesis]. California State University. https://digitalcommons.csumb.edu/caps_thes_all/295
Marín, D., Vidal, M. I., Peirats, J. & López, M. (2018). Gamificación en la evaluación del aprendizaje: valoración del uso de Kahoot! In REDINE (ed.), Innovate strategies for Higher Education in Spain (pp. 8-17). Adaya Press.
Mazcuñán, E. M. (2015). Creación de lecciones a partir de vídeos con EdPuzzle. In Tele (in) 2 series: nuevos enfoques en la aplicación práctica de la innovación docente (pp. 47-52).
McLeod, S. (2019). What does effect size tell you? Simply Psychology. https://www.simplypsychology.org/effect-size.html
Mejía, M. F. (2012). ¿Cómo se podría enseñar la factorización de polinomios integrando calculadoras simbólicas y lápiz y papel? In O. Gilberto (ed.), Memorias del 13.er Encuentro Colombiano de Matemática Educativa (pp. 1171-1177). Sello Editorial Universidad de Medellín.
Méndez, T. (2012). Marco figural como medio para factorizar polinomios cuadráticos. Bolema: Boletim de Educação Matemática, 26(44), 1395-1416.
Novak, G. M., Gavrin, A., Wolfgang, C. & y Patterson, E. (1999). Just-in-time teaching: blending active learning with web technology. Prentice Hall PTR.
Orcos, L., Blázquez, P., Curto, M., Molina, F. J. & Magreñán, Á. A. (2018). Use of Kahoot and Ed-Puzzle by smartphone in the classroom: the design of a methodological proposal. In L. Uden, D. Liberona & J. Ristvej (eds.), Learning technologies for educational challenges (pp. 37-47). 10.1007/978-3-319-95522-3_4
Ottmar, E., Landy, D., Weitnauer, E. & Goldstone, R. (2015). Graspable Mathematics: using perceptual learning technology to discover algebraic notation. In Integrating touch-enabled and mobile devices into contemporary Mathematics education (pp. 24-48). IGI Global.
Pincheira, N. & Vásquez, C. (2021). Recursos virtuales para la enseñanza del álgebra: un aporte para la priorización curricular chilena frente a la pandemia de la COVID-19. Unión-Revista Iberoamericana de Educación Matemática, 17(61), e009-e009.
Pintor, E., Gargantilla, P., Herreros, B. & López, M. (2014). Kahoot en docencia: una alternativa practica a los clickers. In XI Jornadas Internacionales de Innovación Universitaria. Universidad Europea de Madrid. http://abacus.universidadeuropea.es/bitstream/handle/11268/3603/x_jiiu_2014_322.pdf?sequence=2&isAllowed=y
Plaza, L., González, J. & Vasyunkina, O. (2020). Obstáculos en la enseñanza-aprendizaje de la matemática. Revisión sistemática. En P. Balda, M. M. Parra & H. Sostenes (eds.), Acta latinoamericana de matemática educativa (pp. 295-304). Comité Latinoamericano de Matemática Educativa.
Pueo, B., Jiménez-Olmedo, J., Carbonell-Martínez, J. & Penichet-Tomas, A. (2017). Aplicación de la herramienta EdPuzzle como experiencia transversal de clases invertida en distintas etapas educativas. XARXES-INNOVAESTIC 2017 (pp. 208-209). Universidad de Alicante.
Real Decreto de 1105/2014, de 26 de diciembre, por el que se establece el currículo básico de la Educación Secundaria Obligatoria y del Bachillerato (2014), Boletín Oficial del Estado, 3, sec. I, de 3 de enero de 2015, 169 a 546. https://www.boe.es/eli/es/rd/2014/12/26/1105
Rodríguez, R. A., López, B. S. & Mortera, F. J. (2017). El video como recurso educativo abierto y la enseñanza de matemáticas. Revista Electrónica de Investigación Educativa, 19(3), 92-100. http://doi.org/10.24320/redie.2017.19.3.936
Romero-Martín, R., Castejón-Oliva, F. J. & López-Pastor, V. (2015). Divergencias del alumnado y del profesorado universitario sobre las dificultades para aplicar la evaluación formativa. RELIEVE-Revista Electrónica de Investigación y Evaluación Educativa, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.7203/relieve.21.1.5169
Salazar-Hernández, R., Pérez-Jasso, C., Lerma, A. M. & González, F. A. (2019). TICs y lúdicas como estrategias didácticas para mejorar los aprendizajes de matemáticas en educación básica. Informática y Sistemas: Revista de Tecnologías de la Informática y las Comunicaciones, 3(2), 39-50.
Sein-Echaluce, M. L., Fidalgo- Blanco, Á. & García Peñalvo, F. J. (2017). Trabajo en equipo y Flip Teaching para mejorar el aprendizaje activo del alumnado. Proceedings of IV Congreso Internacional sobre Aprendizaje, Innovación y Competitividad, 610-615. https://doi.org/10.26754/CINAIC.2017.000001_129
Sosa, M. & Valverde, J. (2020). Perfiles docentes en el contexto de la transformación digital de la escuela. Bordón. Revista de Pedagogía, 72(1), 151-173. https://doi.org/10.13042/Bordon.2020.72965
Tettay-Mejía, S. I., Pulgar-García, M. & Rojas-Sandoval, Y. (2019). Errores en la resolución de problemas con ecuaciones de primer grado en estudiantes de secundaria. Praxis, 15(2), 193-205. https://doi.org/10.21676/23897856.3249
Webel, C. Sheffel, C. & Conner K. A. (2018). Flipping instruction in a fifth-grade class: a case of an elementary Mathematics specialist. Teaching and Teacher Education, 71, 271-282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.01.007
Weitnauer, E., Landy, D. & Ottmar, E. (2016, December). Graspable math: towards dynamic algebra notations that support learners better than paper. In 2016 Future Technologies Conference (FTC) (pp. 406-414). IEEE.
Wilson, A. (2016). The Flipped Approach: the use of embedded questions in Math videos. [Master thesis]. University of Texas. https://scholarworks.utep.edu/open_etd/983/