Ratings and rankings: the consumption-work link in the platform economy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22325/fes/res.2023.174Keywords:
Consumption, algorithmic management, organization, platform, sociomaterialityAbstract
The sociology of platforms has pointed out that the consolidation of online business models relies on the establishment of a specific link between an increasingly individualized consumer culture and a kind of work configured and managed by the platforms for their own benefit. This thesis, however, does not consider the role of rating and ranking systems in the relationship between consumption and work. In this paper we argue that ratings and rankings mediate this link between consumption and work, setting specific information asymmetries and dependency and power relations between them and with the platform. Moreover, under certain conditions, the rating and ranking system allows platform workers to elaborate strategies of resistance to the algorithm and to reformulate their relationship with the consumer.
References
Alonso, L. E., y Fernández, C. J. (2021). El papel del consumo en la economía de plataformas: el vínculo oculto. Revista Española de Sociología, 30(3), a69. https://doi.org/10.22325/fes/res.2021.69
Baldwin, C., y Woodard, C. J. (2009). The architecture of platforms: A unified view. Platforms, markets and innovation, 32, 19-44. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1265155
Bucher, E., Schou, P., & Waldkirch, M. (2021). Pacifying the algorithm–Anticipatory compliance in the face of algorithmic management in the gig economy. Organization, 28(1), 44-67. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508420961531
Cameron, L. D., y Rahman, H. (2022). Expanding the locus of resistance: Understanding the co-constitution of control and resistance in the gig economy. Organization Science, 33(1), 38-58. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2021.1557
Chen, J. Y. (2018). Thrown under the Bus and Outrunning It! The Logic of Didi and Taxi Drivers’ Labour and Activism in the On-Demand Economy. New Media & Society, 20(8), 2691-2711. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817729149
Clegg, S. (1990). Modern organizations: Organization studies in the postmodern world. Sage.
Curchod, C., Patriotta, G., Cohen, L., y Neysen, N. (2020). Working for an algorithm: Power asymmetries and agency in online work settings. Administrative Science Quarterly, 65(3), 644-676. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839219867024
Cutolo, D., & Kenney, M. (2021). Platform-dependent entrepreneurs: Power asymmetries, risks, and strategies in the platform economy. Academy of Management Perspectives, 35(4), 584-605. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3372560
Daugherty, P. R., & Wilson, H. J. (2018). Human+Machine. Reimagining Work in the Age of AI, Cambridge. HBR Press.
Davies, H. C. (2018). Redefining filter bubbles as (escapable) socio-technical recursion. Sociological Research Online, 23(3), 637-654. https://doi.org/10.1177/1360780418763824
de Rivera, J. (2021). Crítica de la economía colaborativa: análisis del modelo y sus alternativas desde una perspectiva sociológica. Madrid: CSIC.
Figini, P., Vici, L., & Viglia, G. (2020). A comparison of hotel ratings between verified and non-verified online review platforms. International Journal of Culture, Tourism and Hospitality Research, 14(2), 157-171. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCTHR-10-2019-0193
Foucault, M. (2000). Vigilar y castigar: nacimiento de la prisión. Madrid: Siglo XXI.
Friedberg, E., & Crozier, M. (1980). Actors and systems: The politics of collective action. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Fuentes, C., & Sörum, N. (2019). Agencing ethical consumers: smartphone apps and the socio-material reconfiguration of everyday life. Consumption Markets & Culture, 22(2), 131-156. https://doi.org/10.1080/10253866.2018.1456428
Galière, S. (2020). When food‐delivery platform workers consent to algorithmic management: a Foucauldian perspective. New Technology, Work and Employment, 35(3), 357-370. https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12177
Graham, T., & Rodriguez, A. (2021). The Sociomateriality of Rating and Ranking Devices on Social Media: A Case Study of Reddit’s Voting Practices. Social Media+ Society, 7(3). https://doi.org/20563051211047667.
Hatch, M. J. (2018). Organization Theory: Modern, symbolic, and postmodern perspectives. Oxford University Press.
Hochschild, A. (2003). The Managed Heart: Commercialization of Human Feeling. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Leonardi, P. M. (2013). Theoretical foundations for the study of sociomateriality. Information and Organization, 23(2), 59-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2013.02.002
Luca, M., & Zervas, G. (2016). Fake it till you make it: Reputation, competition, and Yelp review fraud. Management Science, 62(12), 3412-3427. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2015.2304
Maffie, M. D. (2022). The perils of laundering control through customers: A study of control and resistance in the ride-hail industry. ILR Review, 75(2), 348-372. https://doi.org/10.1177/0019793920972679
Mercier-Roy, M., & Mailhot, C. (2019). What’s in an app? Investigating the moral struggles behind a sharing economy device. Journal of Business Ethics, 159(4), 977-996. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04207-7
Minazzi, R. (2010). Hotel classification systems: a comparison of international case studies. Acta Universitatis Danubius: Œconomica, 6(4), 65-88.
Möhlmann, M., Zalmanson, L., Henfridsson, O., y Gregory, R. W. (2021). Algorithmic management of work on online labor platforms: when matching meets control. MIS Quarterly, 45(4), 1999-2022. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2021/15333
Morris, J. (2021). Infrastructures of discovery: examining podcast ratings and rankings. Cultural Studies, 35(4-5), 728-749. https://doi.org/10.1080/09502386.2021.1895246
Murray, A., Rhymer, J., & Sirmon, D.G. (2021). Humans and technology: Forms of conjoined agency in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 46(3), 552-571. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2019.0186
O’Neil, C. (2018). Armas de destrucción matemática: cómo el big data aumenta la desigualdad y amenaza la democracia. Capitán Swing Libros.
Orlikowski, W. (2007). Sociomaterial practices: Exploring technology at work. Organization Studies, 28(9), 1435-1448. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840607081138
Orlikowski, W., y Scott, S. V. (2015). Exploring material discursive practices. Journal of Management Studies, 52(5), 697-705. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12114.
Revilla, J. C., y Blázquez, V. (2021). Uneasy riders: contradictorias lógicas disciplinarias para una posición laboral imposible. Revista Española de Sociología, 30(2), a35. https://doi.org/10.22325/fes/res.2021.35
Roberts, A., & Zietsma, C. (2018). Working for an app: Organizational boundaries, roles, and meaning of work in the “on-demand” economy. In Research in the Sociology of Organizations (Vol. 57, pp. 195-225). Bingley Emerald. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0733-558X20180000057008
Rosenblat, A., & Stark, L. (2016). Algorithmic labor and information asymmetries: A case study of Uber’s drivers. International Journal of Communication, 10, 3758-3784. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/4892/1739
Scholz, T. (2016). Platform Cooperativism. Challenging the corporate sharing economy. New York: Rosa Luxemburg Foundation.
Schor, J. (2021). After the gig: How the sharing economy got hijacked and how to win it back. University of California Press.
Schüssler, E., Attwood-Charles, W., Kirchner, S., & Schor, J. B. (2021). Between mutuality, autonomy and domination: rethinking digital platforms as contested relational structures. Socio-Economic Review, 19(4), 1217-1243. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwab038
Scott, S. V., & Orlikowski, W. (2014). Entanglements in practice. MIS Quarterly, 38(3), 873-894. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2014/38.3.11
Shapiro, A. (2020). Dynamic exploits: calculative asymmetries in the on‐demand economy. New Technology, Work and Employment, 35(2), 162-177. https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12160
Srnicek, N. (2017). Platform capitalism. Londres: John Wiley & Sons.
Stark, D., y Pais, I. (2020). Algorithmic management in the platform economy. Sociologica, 14(3), 47-72. https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1971-8853/12221
The Automobile Association (2022). Our History. https://www.theaa.com/about-us
TripAdvisor (2021). Transparency Report. https://www.tripadvisor.es/TripAdvisorInsights/w5144
Upwork (2018). Upwork Annual Report. https://investors.upwork.com
Vallas, S., & Schor, J. (2020). What do platforms do? Understanding the gig economy. Annual Review of Sociology, 46(1), 273-294. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-121919-054857
van den Broek, E., Sergeeva, A., & Huysman, M. (2021). When the Machine Meets the Expert: An Ethnography of Developing AI for Hiring. MIS Quarterly, 45(3), 1557-1580. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2021/16559
Wood, A. J., Graham, M., Lehdonvirta, V., & Hjorth, I. (2019). Good gig, bad gig: autonomy and algorithmic control in the global gig economy. Work, Employment and Society, 33(1), 56-75. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017018785616
Zuboff, S. (2019). La era del capitalismo de la vigilancia. Barcelona: Paidos.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Pablo García Ruiz
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
• The transfer of the copyright of the article to Revista Española de Sociología.
• The assignment to the Revista Española de Sociología of the rights of commercial exploitation of the article to third parties both in the offset and digital formats, as well as to the search engines and platforms that may serve as intermediaries for the sale or knowledge of the article.