The case method in the teaching of contemporary Arab political thought: The shutdown of the pan-Arab newspaper al-Ḥayāt as a case study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21308/recp.60.04Keywords:
active methodologies, case method, Arab political thought, MENA Region, teachingAbstract
Backed by the development of postcolonial studies and subaltern studies, the teaching of contemporary
Arab political thought as a “border” and interdisciplinary subject must provide students with the theoretical and conceptual tools to respond to the ideological, social, political and intellectual dynamism of contemporary Arab societies in transformation. To apply this methodological approach, this article presents a practical activity based on the case method (CM). As its general objective, the method challenges students to assume learning as a space for cross-cultural reflection through the analysis and argumentation of a real case history: in this instance, the definitive closure
of the influential pan-Arab newspaper al-Ḥayāt in March 2020, after almost 75 years of existence. The activity trains students in general and instrumental competences, such as critical text analysis, by positioning them face-to-face with the case under study. After analyzing and evaluating the case
elements provided in the classroom, students can apply any previously acquired knowledge about
reform, identity, democracy, culture, Arab nationalism, capitalism, etc. Responding to the case in question, students proved to be able to develop alternatives and synthesize their own views. This method also encourages students to analyze their self-perception of this process.
Downloads
References
Abu-Rabi‘, Ibrahim M. 2004. Contemporary Arab Thought: Studies in Post-1967 Arab Intellectual History. London: Pluto Press.
Anderson, Jon W. 2004. “Vers une ‘thechno-practique’ d’Internet dans le monde arabe”, Maghreb-Machrek, 178: 45-58.
Ayalon, Ami. 1995. The Press in the Arab Middle East. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195087802.001.0001.
Badia, Antoni. 2014. “Emociones y sentimientos del profesorado en la enseñanza y formación docente”, in Carles Monereo (ed.), Enseñando a enseñar en la Universidad. La formación del profesorado basada en incidentes críticos. Barcelona: Octaedro-UB.
Benito, Águeda and Ana Cruz. 2011. Nuevas claves para la docencia universitaria. Madrid: Narcea.
Bennabi, Malek. 2016. Al-Ṣirā’ al-fikrī fī l-bilād al-musta’mara [12th ed.]. Damascus; Beirut: Afāq ma“arifa mutajaddida.
Berbeco, Stephen. 2019. Case Method and the Arabic Teacher. A practical guide. London: Lehigh University Press.
Bloom, Benjamin S., Max D. Engelhard, Edward J. Furst, Walker H. Hill and David R. Krathwohl. 1956. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. Vol. I: Cognitive domain. New York: McKay.
Dabashi, Hamid. 2012. The Arab Spring: The End of Postcolonialism. New York: Zed Books. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350222946.
De Miguel Díaz, Mario. 2005. Modalidades de enseñanza centradas en el desarrollo de competencias. Orientaciones para promover el cambio metodológico en el espacio europeo de educación superior. Oviedo: Universidad de Oviedo.
Díaz Sanz, Marina and Lucía Ferreiro Prado. 2021. “Orientalism is Not My Opinion: Decolonial teaching and the problem of credibility in IR courses with a MENA focus”, Politics. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/02633957211009068.
ElHawari, Rasha. 2020. Teaching Arabic as a Heritage Language. London: Routledge. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351014670.
Elias Hanna, Elias. 1993. La presse arabe. Paris: Maisonneuve et Larose.
Escribano, Alicia and Ángela del Valle (eds). 2008. El aprendizaje basado en problemas: una propuesta metodológica en educación superior. Madrid: Narcea.
Esteve Mon, Francesc M. and Mercé Gisbert Cervera. 2011. “El Nuevo paradigma de aprendizaje y nuevas tecnologías”, Revista de Docencia Universitaria, 9 (3): 55-73. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4995/redu.2011.6149.
Fernsten, Linda and Jeffrey Fernsten. 2005. “Portfolio assessment and reflection: Enhancing learning through effective practice”Reflective practice, 6 (2): 303-309. Available at: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14623940500106542.
Ferreiro Prado, Lucía (ed.). 2020. Metodologías activas en las aulas de Ciencia Política y Relaciones Internacionales. Simulaciones de procesos políticos en organizaciones internacionales y nacionales. Valencia: Tirant Lo Blanc.
Idiazabal Gorrotxategi, Itziar and Joaquim Dolz Mestre. 2013. Enseñar (lenguas) en contextos multilingües. Bilbao: Universidad del País Vasco.
Jābrī, Muhammab “Abid al-. 2001. Buniyyat al-’aql al-’arabī. Naqd al-’aql al-’arabī I. Casablanca: al-Markaz al-thaqāfī l-’arabī.
Jones, Beau Fly, Claudette M. Rassmussen and Mary C. Moffit. 1997. Real-life Problem Solving: A collaborative approach to interdisciplinary learning. Washington DC: American Psychological Association. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/10266-000.
Kassab, Elisabeth Suzanne. 2010. Contemporary Arab Thought: Cultural critique in comparative perspective. New York: Columbia University Press.
Macías Amoretti, Juan Antonio. 2019. “El post-orientalismo como marco teórico: posibilidades y limitaciones desde el análisis del discurso intelectual marroquí”, in Luz Gómez García (ed.), Islam y desposesión. Resignificar la pertenencia. Madrid: Ediciones del Oriente y del Mediterráneo.
Majhadānī, Sa’d Salmān al-. 2014. Al-Ṣaḥāfa al-’arabiyya wa-l-dawliyya. Al-’Ayn: Dār al-kitāb al-jāmi’ī.
Masjuan i Codina, Josep Maria, Marina Elias Andreu y Helena Troiano I Gomá. 2009. “El contexto de enseñanza un elemento fundamental en la implementación de innovaciones pedagógicas relacionadas con los créditos europeos”, Revista Complutense de Educación, 20, 2: 355-380.
McNergney, Robert F., Edward R. Ducharme and Mary K. Ducharme. 1999. Educating for Democracy. Case-method teaching and learning. London: Routledge. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410601292.
Melero Aguilar, Noelia. 2012. “El paradigma crítico y los aportes de la investigación acción participativa en la transformación de la realidad social”, Cuestiones Pedagógicas: Revista de Ciencias de la Educación, 21: 339-355.
Moallem, Mahnaz, Woei Hung and Nada Dabbagh. 2019. The Wiley Handbook of Problem-Based Learning. London: Wiley-Blackwell. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119173243.
Omri, Mohamed-Salah. 2020. “Notes on the local and global significance of the Tunisian historian of the subaltern, Hedi Timmoumi”, Les Cahiers de Tunisie, 226-227: 331-334.
Otxandorena Satrustegi, Saioa. 2019. La lengua y el lenguaje como armas. Análisis de concepción y actitudes desde un enfoque multidisciplinar y transfronterizo . Granada: Universidad de Granada.
Owais, Rasha. 2011. “Arab Media during the Arab Spring in Egypt and Tunisia: Time for Change”, Middle East Media Educator, 1 (1): 9-13.
Ramírez, Ángeles and Laura Mijares. 2021. Los feminismos ante el islam. El velo y los cuerpos de las mujeres. Madrid: Catarata.
Rosenberg, Shawn W. 1998. “The Structure of Political Thinking”, American Journal of Political Science, 32, 3: 539-566. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/2111236.
Shoat, Ella. 1992. “Notes on the post-colonial”, Social Texts, 31-32: 99-113. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/466220.
Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. 2010. Crítica de la razón poscolonial. Madrid: Akal.
Suleyman, Yasir. 2003. The Arabic Language and National Identity. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.
Tourón, Javier and Déborah Martín R. 2019. Aprender y enseñar en la Universidad hoy. Una guía práctica para profesores. Logroño: UNIR.
Zerrillo, Philip. 2021. Case for Cases: Teaching with Cases. How to Teach Using the Case Method. London: World Scientific.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Juan A. Macías-Amoretti
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
