What do families take into account when choosing their children’s school? Factors in choosing and ruling out schools in the city of Barcelona
Palavras-chave:
quasi-markets, school choice, school access, school segregation, school composition.Resumo
This article explores the motivations that lead families to choose a P3 school in the city ofBarcelona. It has been elaborated from the empirical information produced by a study carried out
by the authors between 2008 and 2009. According to the quantitative data presented here,
educational-specific motivations (school educational project) and pragmatic-specific criteria
(home-school proximity and siblings already at the school) are salient amongst positive school
choice factors. In contrast, beyond these same factors, other reasons such us school composition
and the quality of teachers become significant amongst negative school choices (discarded
decisions). A typological operation permits to identify four family groups using distinct logics of
school choice. Such findings are interpreted also on the basis of the interviews carried out. In
particular, “selective families” (group 1) and “instrumental families” (group 2), with varying
degrees of intensity, orient their choices towards maximizing their children opportunities of
academic success. Among “expressive families” (group 3), the concern is more on the value
orientation side of schools rather than on their instrumental dimension. “Delegative families”
(group 4), in general, are less demanding, and tend to prioritize only the criteria of school-home
proximity. Finally, significant alignments between social inequalities and choice groups are
observed; more specifically, the average level of education is markedly higher among “selective
families” than among “delegative families”. In consequence, we conclude that the liberalization of
school choice that comes along with education quasi-markets, far from opening the real margin of
choice to all families, tends to favor the objectives, capacities and resources of certain groups of
families.
Referências
Alegre, M.A. y Benito, R. (2012). ‘The best school for my child?’ Social geographies of school
choice in Barcelona. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 33(6), 849-871.
Alegre, M.A., Benito, R., González, S., y Chela, X. (2010). Les famílies davant l’elecció
escolar. Dilemes i desigualtats en la tria de centre a la ciutat de Barcelona.
Barcelona: Mediterrània, Col. Polítiques 72.
Archbald, D. (1998). Magnet schools, voluntary desegregation, and public choice theory:
Limits and possibilities in a big city school system. Madison, WI: University of
Wisconsin Press.
Armour, D.J., y Peiser, B.M. (1998). Interdistrict choice in Massachusetts. En P.E. Peterson y
B.C. Hassel (Eds.). Learning from school choice (pp. 157-186). Washington, DC:
Brookings Institution Press.
Ball, S. J. (2007). Education Plc: Understanding Private Sector Participation in Public Sector
Education. Londres: Routledge
Ball, S. J., Bowe, R. y Gewirtz, S. (1996). School choice, social class and distinction: the
realization of social advantage in education. Journal of Education Policy, 11(1), 89–
Ball, S.J. (2012). Global Education Inc. New Policy Networks andthe Neoliberal Imaginary.
Londres: Routledge.
Ball, S.J. (2003). Class Strategies and the Education. Market.Londres: RoutledgeFalmer.
Ball, S.J. y Youdell, D. (2007). Hidden privatisation in public education. Education
International 5th World Congress Report.
Ball, S.J., y Vincent, C. (1998). ‘I heard it in the grapevine’: ‘Hot’ knowledge and school
choice. Journal of Education Policy, 11(1), 89-112.
Bernal, J.L. (2007). Parental choice, social class and market forces: the consequences of
privatization of public services in education. Journal of EducationPolicy, 20(6), 779-
Bonal, X., Alegre, M.A., Herrera, D., González, I., Rovira, M., y Saurí, E. (2005).
Apropiaciones escolares. Usos y sentidos de la educación obligatoria desde los
adolescentes. Barcelona: Octaedro.
Bourdieu, P., y Wacquant, L.J.D. (1992). An invitation to reflexive sociology. Chicago:
University of Chicago Press.
Bunar, N. (2010). Choosing for quality or inequality: current perspectives on the
implementation of school choice policy in Sweden. Journal of Education Policy, 25(1),
-18.
Burch, P. (2009). Hidden Markets.The New Education Privatization. New York: Routledge.
Burgess, S. et al. (2007).The impact of school choice on sorting by ability and socioeconomic
factors in English secondary education. En L. Wößmann y P.E. Peterson (Eds.). Schools
and the equal opportunity problem (pp. 273-292). Cambridge, M.A.: MIT Press.
Clowes, G.A. (2008). With the Right Design, Vouchers Can Reform Public Schools: Lessons
from the Milwaukee Parental Choice Program. Journal of School Choice, 2(3), 367-
Dronkers, J. y Roberts, P. (2008). Differences in Scholastic Achievement of Public, Private
Government-Dependent, and Private Independent Schools. A Cross-National Analysis.
Educational Policy, 22(4), 541-577.
Gewirtz, S., Ball, S.J. y Bowe, R. (1995). Markets, choice and equity in education.
Buckingham: Open University Press.
Goldring, E., y Hausman, C. (1999). Reasons for parental choice of urban schools. Journal of
Education Policy, 4(5), 469-490
Gorard, S., Taylor, C. y Fitz, J. (2003). Schools, markets, and choice policies. Londres:
Routledge Falmer.
Lauder, H. y Hughes, D. (Eds.) (1999).Trading in Futures. Why Markets in Education Don’t
Work. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Maloutas, T. (2007). Middle class education strategies and residential segregation in Athens.
Journal of Education Policy, 22(1), 49-68.
Noreisch, K. (2007). School catchment area evasion: the case of Berlin, Germany. Journal of
Education Policy, 22(1), 69-90.
Olmedo, A. y Santa Cruz, E. (2008). Las familias de clase media y elección de centro: el orden
instrumental como condición necesaria pero no suficiente. Profesorado, revista de
currículum y formación del profesorado, 12 (2). www.ugr.es/~recfpro/rev122ART7.pdf
Rambla, X. (2003). Las desigualdades de clase en la elección de escuela. Revista de
Educación, 330, 83-98.
Rangvid, B.S. (2010). School Choice, Universal Vouchers and Native Flight from Local Schools.
European Sociologica Review, 26(3), 319-335.
Van Zanten, A. (2007). Reflexividad y elección de la escuela por los padres de la clase media
en Francia. Revista de Antropología Social, 16, 245-278
Van Zanten, A. (2003). Middle-class parents and social mix in French urban schools:
reproduction and transformation of class relations in education. International Studies
in Sociology of Education, 13(2), 107-123.
Van Zanten, A. (2006). Les choix scolaires dans la banlieue parisienne, défection, prise de
parele et évitement de la mixité. En A.H. Lagrange (Ed.), La Cohésion sociale à
l’épreuve des inégalités (pp. 315-350). París: Presses Universitaires de France.
Vandenbergue, V. (1999).Combining market and bureaucratic control in education: an answer
to market and bureaucratic failure. Comparative Education, 35(3), 271-282.
West, A. y Ylönen (2010). Market-oriented school reform in England and Finland: school
choice, finance and governance. Educational Studies, 36(1), 1-12.
Whitty, G., y Power, S. (2000). Marketization and privatization in mass education
systems.International Journal of Educational Development, 20(2), 93-107.
Wößmann, L. et al. (2007). School Accountability, Autonomy, Choice and the Level of
Student Achievement: International Evidence from PISA 2003. OECD Education
Working Paper 13. Paris: OCDE.
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Secção
Licença
En el momento en que una obra es aceptada para su publicación, se entiende que el autor cede a la Revista PROFESORADO (en adelante RECP) en exclusiva los derechos de reproducción, distribución y venta de su manuscrito para su explotación en todos los países del mundo en formato de revista de papel, así como en cualquier otro soporte magnético, óptico y digital.Los autores cederán también a RECP los derechos de comunicación pública para su difusión y explotación a través de Intranets, Internet y cualesquiera portales y dispositivos inalámbricos que decida el editor, mediante la puesta a disposición de los usuarios para consulta online de su contenido y su extracto, para su impresión en papel y/o para su descarga y archivo, todo ello en los términos y condiciones que consten en la web donde se halle alojada la obra. A su vez, la RECP autoriza a los autores de los trabajos publicados en la revista a que ofrezcan en sus webs personales o en cualquier repositorio de acceso abierto una copia de esos trabajos una vez publicados. Junto con esa copia ha de incluirse una mención específica de la RECP, citando el año y el número de la revista en que fue publicado el artículo o nota de investigación y añadiendo, además, el enlace a la web de la RECP.
La RECP también recomienda y permite a sus autores que licencien su obra bajo la licencia de Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 3.0 España (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0 ES), que implica que el artículo y la nota de investigación pueda copiarse, distribuirse y comunicarse públicamente bajo la condición de que en los créditos se reconozca explícitamente al autor y la obra bajo la forma establecida por éste, sin derecho a su explotación comercial y la elaboración de obras derivadas.
