Four levels of self-interpretation: A paradigm for interpretive social philosophy and political criticism

Authors

  • Hartmut Rosa Universität Jena

Keywords:

identity, political criticism, self-interpretation, social change, social pathologies

Abstract

If we are to find the criteria for critical analyses of social arrangements and processes not in some abstract universalist framework, but from the guiding ‘self-interpretations’ of the societies in question, as contemporary contextualist and ‘communitarian’ approaches to social philosophy suggest, the vexing question arises as to where these self-interpretations can be found and how to identify them. This article presents a model according to which there are four interdependent as well as partially autonomous spheres or ‘levels’ of socially relevant self-interpretation that have to be taken into equally account in order to provide a solid basis for social and political criticism. Thus, it is from the tensions and inconsistencies between (A) social ideas and doctrines, (B) social institutions and practices, (C) individual beliefs and convictions, and (D) body-practices and habits that social pathologies can be identified and possible solutions can be envisaged.

References

Ball, Terence. (1998). Transforming Political Discourse: Political Theory and Critical Conceptual History. Blackwell.

Barber, Benjamin. (1984). Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age. University of California Press.

Bell, Daniel. (1976). The Cultural Contradictions of Capitalism. Basic Books.

Bermudez, José Luis; Marcel, Anthony y Eilan, Naomi (eds.). (1995). The Body and the Self. MIT Press.

Bernstein, Richard. (1976). The Restructuring of Social and Political Theory. Brace Jovanovich.

Blanning, T.C.W. (ed.). (1996). The Rise and Fall of the French Revolution. University of Chicago Press.

Bordo, Susan. (1993). Unbearable Weight: Feminism, Western Culture, and the Body. University of California Press.

Cribb, Alan. (1991). Values and Comparative Politics: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Political Science. Avebury.

Ferrara, Alessandro. (1998). Reflective Authenticity. Routledge.

Foucault, Michel. (1965). Madness and Civilization. Pantheon Books.

Foucault, Michel. (1977). Discipline and Punish: The Birth of Prison. Pantheon Books.

Giddens, Anthony. (1977). Studies in Social and Political Theory. Basic Books.

Habermas, Jürgen. (1981). Theorie des Kommunikativen Handelns, Vol. 1. Suhrkamp.

Hesse, Mary. (1980). Revolutions and Reconstructions in the Philosophy of Science. Indiana University Press.

Hiley, David; Bohman, James y Shusterman, Richard (eds.). (1991). The Interpretive Turn: Philosophy, Science, Culture. Cornell University Press.

Honneth, Axel. (1994). Pathologien des Sozialen. Tradition und Aktualität der Sozialphilosophie. En A. Honneth (eds.), Pathologien des Sozialen: Die Aufgaben der Sozialphilosophie. Fischer.

Kamrava, Mehran. (1992.) The Political History of Modern Iran. Praeger.

MacIntyre, Asaldair. (1998). Politics, Philosophy and the Common Good. En K. Knight (ed.) The MacIntyre Reader (pp. 235-252). Notre Dame University Press.

McNally, David. (2001). Bodies of Meaning: Studies on Language, Labor, and Liberation. State University of New York Press.

Oevermann, Ulrich. (1991). Genetischer Strukturalismus und das sozialwissenschaftliche Problem der Erklärung der Entstehung des Neuen. En S. Müller-Dohm (ed.) Jenseits der Utopie: Theoriekritik der Gegenwart (pp. 267-336). Suhrkamp.

Pocock, John G.A. (1962). The History of Political Thought: a Methodological Enquiry. En P. Laslett y W.G. Runciman (eds.) Philosophy, Politics and Society, 2nd series (pp. 183-202). Blackwell.

Pocock, John G.A. (1975) The Machiavellian Moment: Florentine Political Thought and the Atlantic Republican Tradition. Princeton University Press.

Pocock, John G.A. (1980) Political Ideas as Historical Events: Political Philosophers as Historical Actors. In M. Richter (ed.) Political Theory and Political Education (pp. 139-158). Princeton University Press.

Pocock, John G.A. (1989) Politics, Language and Time: Essays on Political Thought and History. University of Chicago Press.

Richter, Melvin (1990). Reconstructing the History of Political Languages: Pocock, Skinner and the Geschichtiche Grundbegriffe. History and Theory, 25: 38-70.

Rorty, Richard. (1967). The Linguistic Turn: Recent Essays in Philosophical Method. University of Chicago Press.

Rosa, Hartmut. (1994). Ideengeschichte und Gesellschaftstheorie: Der Beitrag der “Cambridge School” zur Metatheorie. Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 35(2), 197-223.

Rosa, Hartmut, (1996). Cultural Relativism and Social Criticism from a Taylorian Perspective. Constellations, 3(1), 39-60.

Rosa, Hartmut. (1998a). Identität und kulturelle Praxis: Politische Philosophie nach Charles Taylor. Campus.

Rosa, Hartmut. (1998b). On Defining the Good Life: Liberal Freedom and Capitalist Necessity. Constellations, 5(2), 201-214.

Rosa, Hartmut. (2003). Social Acceleration: Ethical and Political Consequences of a De-Synchronized High-Speed Society. Constellations, 10(1), 3-33.

Schivelbusch, Wolfgang. (1986). The Railway Journey: The Industrialization of Time and Space in the 19th Century. University of California Press.

Selznick, Philip. (1992). The Moral Commonwealth: Social Theory and the Promise of Community. University of California Press.

Shklar, Judith N. (1998). The Work of Michael Walzer. En S. Hoffmann (ed.) Political Thought and Political Thinkers (pp. 376-385). University of Chicago Press.

Skinner, Quentin. (1988). Meaning and Context: Quentin Skinner and His Critics. Edited by James Tully. Polity Press.

Snow, Charles Percy. (1993). The Two Cultures. Cambridge University Press.

Taylor, Charles. [1971] (1985). Interpretation and the Sciences of Man. En Philosophical Papers, Vol. 2 (pp. 15-57). Cambridge University Press.

Taylor, Charles. [1977] (1985). Self-Interpreting Animals. En Philosophical Papers, Vol. 1 (pp. 45-76). Cambridge University Press.

Taylor, Charles. (1978). Hegel’s Sittlichkeit and the Crisis of Representative Institutions. En Y. Yovel (ed.) Philosophy of History and Action (pp 133-154). Reidel.

Taylor, Charles. (1979). Hegel and Modern Society. Cambridge University Press.

Taylor, Charles. (1986). Die Motive einer Verfahrensethik. En W. Kuhlmann (ed.) Moralität und Sittlichkeit. Das Problem Hegels und die Diskursethik (pp. 101-135). Suhrkamp,.

Taylor, Charles. (1989). Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity. Harvard University Press.

Taylor, Charles. (1993). Alternative Futures: Legitimacy, Identity, and Alienation in Late-Twentieth-Century Canada. En Reconciling the Solitudes: Essays on Canadian Federalism and Nationalism (pp. 59-119). McGill-Queen’s University Press.

Taylor, Charles. (1995). To Follow a Rule. En Philosophical Arguments (pp. 165-180). Harvard University Press.

Taylor, Charles. (1998). Engaged Agency and Background in Heidegger. En Charles B. Guignon (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Heidegger (pp. 202-221). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Walzer, Michael. (1983). Spheres of Justice. Basic Books.

Walzer, Michael. (1987). Interpretation and Social Criticism. Harvard University Press.

Walzer, Michael. (1988). The Company of the Critics. Basic Books.

Walzer, Michael. (1994). Thick and Thin. Notre Dame University Press.

Wolin, Richard. (1992). The Terms of Cultural Criticism: The Frankfurt School, Existentialism, Poststructuralism. Columbia University Press.

Young, Iris Marion. (1990). Throwing like a Girl and Other Essays in Feminist Philosophy and Social Theory. Indiana University Press.

Published

2020-12-20

How to Cite

Rosa, H. (2020). Four levels of self-interpretation: A paradigm for interpretive social philosophy and political criticism. Encrucijadas. Revista Crítica De Ciencias Sociales, 20, v2001. Retrieved from https://recyt.fecyt.es/index.php/encrucijadas/article/view/86967