Cuatro niveles de auto-interpretación. Un paradigma para la filosofía social interpretativa y la crítica política

Autores/as

  • Hartmut Rosa Universität Jena

Palabras clave:

identidad, crítica política, auto-interpretación, cambio social, patologías sociales

Resumen

Si queremos encontrar los criterios para el análisis crítico de los sistemas y procesos sociales no en un esquema abstracto y universalista sino a partir de las ‘auto-interpretaciones’ rectoras de las sociedades en cuestión, tal como lo sugieren los enfoques contextualistas y ‘comunitaristas’ contemporáneos de la filosofía social, surge entonces la importante pregunta de dónde se pueden encontrar estas auto-interpretaciones y cómo identificarlas. Este artículo presenta un modelo de acuerdo al cual existen cuatro esferas o ‘niveles’ independientes y parcialmente autónomos de auto-interpretaciones socialmente relevantes que tienen que ser tomadas en igual consideración para poder ofrecer una sólida base para la crítica social y política. Así, es a partir de las tensiones e incoherencias entre (A) ideas y doctrinas sociales, (B) instituciones y prácticas sociales, (C) creencias y convicciones individuales, y (D) prácticas corporales y hábitos que pueden identificar patologías sociales y prever posibles soluciones.

Citas

Ball, Terence. (1998). Transforming Political Discourse: Political Theory and Critical Conceptual History. Blackwell.

Barber, Benjamin. (1984). Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age. University of California Press.

Bell, Daniel. (1976). The Cultural Contradictions of Capitalism. Basic Books.

Bermudez, José Luis; Marcel, Anthony y Eilan, Naomi (eds.). (1995). The Body and the Self. MIT Press.

Bernstein, Richard. (1976). The Restructuring of Social and Political Theory. Brace Jovanovich.

Blanning, T.C.W. (ed.). (1996). The Rise and Fall of the French Revolution. University of Chicago Press.

Bordo, Susan. (1993). Unbearable Weight: Feminism, Western Culture, and the Body. University of California Press.

Cribb, Alan. (1991). Values and Comparative Politics: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Political Science. Avebury.

Ferrara, Alessandro. (1998). Reflective Authenticity. Routledge.

Foucault, Michel. (1965). Madness and Civilization. Pantheon Books.

Foucault, Michel. (1977). Discipline and Punish: The Birth of Prison. Pantheon Books.

Giddens, Anthony. (1977). Studies in Social and Political Theory. Basic Books.

Habermas, Jürgen. (1981). Theorie des Kommunikativen Handelns, Vol. 1. Suhrkamp.

Hesse, Mary. (1980). Revolutions and Reconstructions in the Philosophy of Science. Indiana University Press.

Hiley, David; Bohman, James y Shusterman, Richard (eds.). (1991). The Interpretive Turn: Philosophy, Science, Culture. Cornell University Press.

Honneth, Axel. (1994). Pathologien des Sozialen. Tradition und Aktualität der Sozialphilosophie. En A. Honneth (eds.), Pathologien des Sozialen: Die Aufgaben der Sozialphilosophie. Fischer.

Kamrava, Mehran. (1992.) The Political History of Modern Iran. Praeger.

MacIntyre, Asaldair. (1998). Politics, Philosophy and the Common Good. En K. Knight (ed.) The MacIntyre Reader (pp. 235-252). Notre Dame University Press.

McNally, David. (2001). Bodies of Meaning: Studies on Language, Labor, and Liberation. State University of New York Press.

Oevermann, Ulrich. (1991). Genetischer Strukturalismus und das sozialwissenschaftliche Problem der Erklärung der Entstehung des Neuen. En S. Müller-Dohm (ed.) Jenseits der Utopie: Theoriekritik der Gegenwart (pp. 267-336). Suhrkamp.

Pocock, John G.A. (1962). The History of Political Thought: a Methodological Enquiry. En P. Laslett y W.G. Runciman (eds.) Philosophy, Politics and Society, 2nd series (pp. 183-202). Blackwell.

Pocock, John G.A. (1975) The Machiavellian Moment: Florentine Political Thought and the Atlantic Republican Tradition. Princeton University Press.

Pocock, John G.A. (1980) Political Ideas as Historical Events: Political Philosophers as Historical Actors. In M. Richter (ed.) Political Theory and Political Education (pp. 139-158). Princeton University Press.

Pocock, John G.A. (1989) Politics, Language and Time: Essays on Political Thought and History. University of Chicago Press.

Richter, Melvin (1990). Reconstructing the History of Political Languages: Pocock, Skinner and the Geschichtiche Grundbegriffe. History and Theory, 25: 38-70.

Rorty, Richard. (1967). The Linguistic Turn: Recent Essays in Philosophical Method. University of Chicago Press.

Rosa, Hartmut. (1994). Ideengeschichte und Gesellschaftstheorie: Der Beitrag der “Cambridge School” zur Metatheorie. Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 35(2), 197-223.

Rosa, Hartmut, (1996). Cultural Relativism and Social Criticism from a Taylorian Perspective. Constellations, 3(1), 39-60.

Rosa, Hartmut. (1998a). Identität und kulturelle Praxis: Politische Philosophie nach Charles Taylor. Campus.

Rosa, Hartmut. (1998b). On Defining the Good Life: Liberal Freedom and Capitalist Necessity. Constellations, 5(2), 201-214.

Rosa, Hartmut. (2003). Social Acceleration: Ethical and Political Consequences of a De-Synchronized High-Speed Society. Constellations, 10(1), 3-33.

Schivelbusch, Wolfgang. (1986). The Railway Journey: The Industrialization of Time and Space in the 19th Century. University of California Press.

Selznick, Philip. (1992). The Moral Commonwealth: Social Theory and the Promise of Community. University of California Press.

Shklar, Judith N. (1998). The Work of Michael Walzer. En S. Hoffmann (ed.) Political Thought and Political Thinkers (pp. 376-385). University of Chicago Press.

Skinner, Quentin. (1988). Meaning and Context: Quentin Skinner and His Critics. Edited by James Tully. Polity Press.

Snow, Charles Percy. (1993). The Two Cultures. Cambridge University Press.

Taylor, Charles. [1971] (1985). Interpretation and the Sciences of Man. En Philosophical Papers, Vol. 2 (pp. 15-57). Cambridge University Press.

Taylor, Charles. [1977] (1985). Self-Interpreting Animals. En Philosophical Papers, Vol. 1 (pp. 45-76). Cambridge University Press.

Taylor, Charles. (1978). Hegel’s Sittlichkeit and the Crisis of Representative Institutions. En Y. Yovel (ed.) Philosophy of History and Action (pp 133-154). Reidel.

Taylor, Charles. (1979). Hegel and Modern Society. Cambridge University Press.

Taylor, Charles. (1986). Die Motive einer Verfahrensethik. En W. Kuhlmann (ed.) Moralität und Sittlichkeit. Das Problem Hegels und die Diskursethik (pp. 101-135). Suhrkamp,.

Taylor, Charles. (1989). Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity. Harvard University Press.

Taylor, Charles. (1993). Alternative Futures: Legitimacy, Identity, and Alienation in Late-Twentieth-Century Canada. En Reconciling the Solitudes: Essays on Canadian Federalism and Nationalism (pp. 59-119). McGill-Queen’s University Press.

Taylor, Charles. (1995). To Follow a Rule. En Philosophical Arguments (pp. 165-180). Harvard University Press.

Taylor, Charles. (1998). Engaged Agency and Background in Heidegger. En Charles B. Guignon (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Heidegger (pp. 202-221). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Walzer, Michael. (1983). Spheres of Justice. Basic Books.

Walzer, Michael. (1987). Interpretation and Social Criticism. Harvard University Press.

Walzer, Michael. (1988). The Company of the Critics. Basic Books.

Walzer, Michael. (1994). Thick and Thin. Notre Dame University Press.

Wolin, Richard. (1992). The Terms of Cultural Criticism: The Frankfurt School, Existentialism, Poststructuralism. Columbia University Press.

Young, Iris Marion. (1990). Throwing like a Girl and Other Essays in Feminist Philosophy and Social Theory. Indiana University Press.

Descargas

Publicado

2020-12-20

Cómo citar

Rosa, H. (2020). Cuatro niveles de auto-interpretación. Un paradigma para la filosofía social interpretativa y la crítica política. Encrucijadas. Revista Crítica De Ciencias Sociales, 20, v2001. Recuperado a partir de https://recyt.fecyt.es/index.php/encrucijadas/article/view/86967