Intersecciones entre evaluación participativa y pedagogía social


  • Jill Anne Chouinard University of Ottawa
  • Peter Milley University of Ottawa
  • J. Bradley Cousins Director, Centre for Research on Educational and Community Services. University of Ottawa


Palabras clave:

pedagogía social, evaluación participativa, cambio social


Debido a su desarrollo y evolución, hoy día se discute la existencia de vínculos entre la evaluación participativa y la pedagogía social. En este artículo analizamos las afinidades entre estos dos campos científicos, para identificar puntos de enlace y divergencia, con mayor profundidad que lo desarrollado hasta el presente. Siguiendo una revisión reciente de más 100 estudios empíricos de evaluación participativa (Cousins & Chouinard, 2012), reexaminamos una selección de temas emergentes desde una perspectiva pedagógico-social. Destacamos similitudes y diferencias, y exponemos una serie de problemas a tener en cuenta en la evaluación participativa, con el fin de abrir el diálogo entre aquellos profesionales involucrados en la investigación y la práctica de uno u otro campo.


Amo, C. & Cousins, J. B. (2007). Going through the process: An examination of the operationalization of process use in empirical research on evaluation. In J. B. Cousins (Ed.), Process use in theory, research and practice. New Directions for Evaluation.No. 116 (pp. 5-26). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Brisolara, S. (1998).The history of participatory evaluation and current debates in the field.In E. Whitmore (Ed.), Understanding and practicing participatory evaluation.New Directions in Evaluation, No. 80 (pp. 25-41). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

Cameron, C. & Moss, P. (2011). Social pedagogy: Understandings and opportunities. In C. Cameron & P. Moss (Eds.), Social pedagogy and working with children and young people. (pp. 7-32). London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

Cameron, C., Petrie, P. Wigfall, V., Kleipoedszus, S. & Jasper, A. (2011). Final report of the social pedagogy pilot programme: development and implementation. . London: Institute of Education. Available online:

Chouinard, J. A. (2013). The case for participatory evaluation in an era of accountability. American Journal of Evaluation, 34(2), 237-253.

Chouinard, J. A. & Cousins, J. B. (2013). Participatory evaluation for development: Examining research-based knowledge from the African perspective.African Evaluation Journal, 1(1), 1-19.

Chouinard, J. A. & Cousins, J. B. (in press). The journey from rhetoric to reality: Participatory evaluation in a development context. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability.

Cornwall, A. &Jewkes, R. (1995). What is participatory research? Social Science and Medicine, 41(12), 1667-1676.

Cousins, J. B. (2007).Process use in theory, resesarch and practice. New Directions for Evaluation. No. 116. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

Cousins, J. B. & Chouinard, J. (2012).Participatory evaluation up close: A review and integration of research-based knowledge. Charlotte NC: Information Age Press.

Cousins, J. B. & Earl, L. M. (1992).The case for participatory evaluation.Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 14(4), 397-418.

Coussée, F., Bradt, L., Roose, R. &Bouverne-De Bie, M. (2010).The emerging social pedagogical paradigm in UK child and youth care: Deus ex machina or walking the beaten path? British Journal of Social Work, 40, 789-805.

Eichsteller, G., &Holzhoff, S. (2011a). Conceptual foundations of social pedagogy: A transnational perspective from Germany. In C. Cameron & P. Moss (Eds.), Social pedagogy and working with children and young people. (pp. 33-52). London: Jessica Kingsley.

Eichsteller, G. & Holzhoff, S. (2011b). Social pedagogy as an ethical orientation towards working with people – historical perspectives. . Children Australia, 36.(4), 176-185.

Eriksson, L. & Markström, A.-M. (2003). Interpreting the concept of social pedagogy. In A. Gustavsson, H.-E. Hermansson & J. Hämäläinen (Eds.), Perspective and theory in social pedagogy (pp. 9-23). Göteborg: Daidalos.

Fetterman, D. &Wandersman, A. (Eds.). (2005). Empowerment evaluation principles in practice. New York: Guilford.

Friere, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Seabury Press.

Gaventa, J., Creed, V. & Morrissey, J. (1998). Scaling up: Participatory monitoring and evaluation of a federal empowerment program. In E. Whitmore (Ed.), Understanding and practicing participatory evaluation.New Directions in Evaluation, No. 80 (pp. 81-94). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

Giroux, H.A. (2005). Border crossings: Cultural workers and the politics of education.New York, NY: Routledge.

Greene, J. (2000). Challenges in practicing deliberative democratic evaluation. In K. E. Ryan & L. DeStefano (Eds.), Evaluation as a democratic process: Promoting inclusion, dialogue, and deliberation No. 85 (pp. 27-38). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Gregory, A. (2000). Problematizing participation. Evaluation, 6(2), 179-199.

Hämäläinen, J. (2003). The concept of social pedagogy in the field of social work.Journal of Social Work, 3(1), 69-80.

Hämäläinen, J. (2012). Social pedagogical eyes in the midst of diverse understandings, conceptualisations and activities. International Journal of Social Pedagogy, 1(1), 3-16.

Katz, S., Sutherland, S. & Earl, L. (2002). Developing an evaluation habit of mind. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 17(2), 103-119.

Koengeter, S. & Schroeer, W. (2013). Variations of social pedagogy – Explorations of the transnational settlement movement. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 21(42), 1-21.

Lave, J. & Wagner, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Lewin, K. (1946). Action research and minority problems. Journal of Social Issues 2(4), 34-46.

Long, N. (1992). Battlefields of knowledge: The interlocking of theory and practice in social research and development. In N. Long & A. Long (Eds.), (pp. 3-43). London: Routledge.

Lorenz, W. (1994). Social work in a changing Europe London: Routledge.

Lorenz, W. (2008). Paradigms and politics: Understanding methods paradigms in an historical context: The case of social pedagogy. British Journal of Social Work, 38 625-644.

Oakley, P. (1991). Projects with people: The practice of participation in rural development. Geneva: International Labour Organisation.

Patton, M. Q. (1998). Discovering process use. Evaluation, 4, 225-233.

Patton, M. Q. (2008).Utilization-focused evaluation (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Schugurensky, D. (2011). Paulo Freire. New York: Continuum.

Schugurensky, D., & Silver, M. (2013). Social pedagogy: Historical traditions and transnational connections. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 21(35), 1-16.

Schwandt, T. (2003). “Back to the rough ground!” Beyond theory to practice in evaluation.Evaluation, 9(3),353-364.

Smith, M., & Whyte, B. (2008). Social education and social pedagogy: Reclaiming a Scottish tradition in social work. European Journal of Social Work, 11(1), 15-28.

Smith, M. K. (2012). Social pedagogy: The development of theory and practice. Encyclopaedia of Informal Education. Retrieved November 20, 2013, from

Smith, M. K. (2012). Social pedagogy: the development of theory and practice. In the encyclopaedia of informal education. Retrieved November 20, 2013, from

Storø, J. (2012). The difficult connection between theory and practice in social pedagogy. International Journal of Social Pedagogy, 1(1), 17-29.

Trickett, E. J. & Ryerson-Espino, S. L. (2004). Collaboration and social inquiry: Multiple meanings of a construct and its role in creating useful and valid knowledge. . American Journal of Community Psychology, 34(1/2), 1-69.

Úcar, X. (2012). Social pedagogy in Latin America and Europe: looking for new answers to old questions. In J. Kornbeck and N. R. Jensen (Eds.), Social pedagogy for the entire lifespan, Volume 2. Bremen: EuropauscherHochschulverlagGambH & Co. KG.

Úcar, X. (2013). Exploring different perspectives of social pedagogy: towards a complex and integrated approach. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 21(36), 1-19.