The origins of historical memory in Spain
The costs of memory-related efforts in the Spanish transition
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18042/hp.2022.AL.02Abstract
For quite a long time Spain has been debating whether its Transition to democracy was based upon oblivion or silence regarding the Spanish Civil War and Francoism, or whether an interest on both issues patently shows on many and diverse publications. Undoubtedly, the war was far more and variedly present that the dictatorship during the Transition, and now it is clear that those who pioneered what in later days would be called historical memory claims began their activities precisely during that period. The purpose of this paper, however, is to show that actions aimed to vindicate the remembrance of Francoism’s victims took place, almost exclusively, in local environments and that they were taken by relatives of those executed by the dictatorship or, if anything, local authorities in cooperation with these families. The support of the main regional, and even less so national leftist parties and unions apparatuses was barely non-existent. It is also stressed here that those who began to clear this way were faced with many difficulties, even facing personal risks and confront still powerful actors unwilling to accept the country’s democratization and the resultant change in the inherited historical narrative. The case in point used to prove all these claims is the village of Torremejía (Badajoz), whose first democratically elected mayor was sued for having helped some of his neighbors to move the remains of persons executed by Francoists from the common grave they were into the village’s cemetery. We have been the first researchers to gain access to the relevant judicial file, direct testimonies, and the village archive. The importance of this case goes well beyond the local limits and serves to illustrate both the Transition’s possibilities and its limits.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Paloma Aguilar Fernández, Guillermo León Cáceres
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors whose contributions are accepted for publication in this journal, accept the following terms:
a. The authors retain their copyright and guarantee to the magazine the right of first publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution License Attribution-Noncommercial-No derivative works 4.0 Spain, which allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and its first publication is indicated.
b. Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements to distribute the version of the published work (e.g. deposit in an institutional repository or archive, or published in a monographic volume) provided the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
PLAGIARISM AND SCIENTIFIC FRAUD
The publication of work that infringes on intellectual property rights is the sole responsibility of the authors, including any conflicts that may occur regarding infringement of copyright. This includes, most importantly, conflicts related to the commission of plagiarism and/or scientific fraud.
Plagiarism is understood to include:
1. Presenting the work of others as your own.
2. Adopting words or ideas from other authors without due recognition.
3. Not using quotation marks or another distinctive format to distinguish literal quotations.
4. Giving incorrect information about the true source of a citation.
5. The paraphrasing of a source without mentioning the source.
6. Excessive paraphrasing, even if the source is mentioned.
Practices constituting scientific fraud are as follows:
1. Fabrication, falsification or omission of data and plagiarism.
2. Duplicate publication.
3. Conflicts of authorship.