The construction of a myth. Suárez in the Portuguese and Spanish press (1984-2014)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18042/hp.48.05Abstract
The former Prime Minister of Spain, Adolfo Suárez, has become one of the founding myths of Spanish democracy in recent years. In spite of leaving the government in 1981, in great disrepute, when the former president died he was presented in all the media as the true architect of the Transition to democracy, and as a model of political virtues. In this paper we aim to study the construction of the narrative about Suárez and his memory after his departure from government. To do so, we have chosen five dates that we believe can clearly show such path: his resignation; his actions in the 23F; his definitive resignation from politics with the CDS; the awarding of the Prince of Asturias Prize; and his death. For the analysis we have chosen the newspapers with the highest circulation in Spain and Portugal between 1981 and 2014. We have intended to carry out a comparative study to see whether the memory of Suárez also changed abroad. After our analysis, we have been able to verify that the steps in the construction of the myth began a few weeks after his departure, almost through the back door of politics, in the 23F coup d’état. His departure from politics allowed his figure to be appreciated without partisanship, and then the recognition and awards came. His death, in the midst of the political crisis, increased the value of his figure, which was also influenced by the nostalgia for the Transition as a period of harmony and consensus and the need for symbols of unity among Spaniards.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Concha Langa Nuño
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors whose contributions are accepted for publication in this journal, accept the following terms:
a. The authors retain their copyright and guarantee to the magazine the right of first publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution License Attribution-Noncommercial-No derivative works 4.0 Spain, which allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and its first publication is indicated.
b. Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements to distribute the version of the published work (e.g. deposit in an institutional repository or archive, or published in a monographic volume) provided the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
PLAGIARISM AND SCIENTIFIC FRAUD
The publication of work that infringes on intellectual property rights is the sole responsibility of the authors, including any conflicts that may occur regarding infringement of copyright. This includes, most importantly, conflicts related to the commission of plagiarism and/or scientific fraud.
Plagiarism is understood to include:
1. Presenting the work of others as your own.
2. Adopting words or ideas from other authors without due recognition.
3. Not using quotation marks or another distinctive format to distinguish literal quotations.
4. Giving incorrect information about the true source of a citation.
5. The paraphrasing of a source without mentioning the source.
6. Excessive paraphrasing, even if the source is mentioned.
Practices constituting scientific fraud are as follows:
1. Fabrication, falsification or omission of data and plagiarism.
2. Duplicate publication.
3. Conflicts of authorship.
