The European Institutions in the face of the Rule of law crisis in Hungary and Poland
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18042/hp.44.05Abstract
This article addresses the crisis of the rule of law in Hungary and Poland, in the context of the history of European integration. Since the mid-1990s, the Union has been gradually equipping itself with specific procedures so that its institutions can respond to a possible violation of its values by a Member State. This process responded particularly to the imminence of a fifth enlargement of an unprecedented dimension, which would incorporate States with a short democratic background. Years later, in a context marked by the rise of populism, the illiberal drift of the Hungarian and Polish governments has caused the first use of the new procedures, highlighting their insufficiency in the face of a crisis of this nature and showing the limits of the Unión´s ability to exert its influence after accession.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Belén Becerril Atienza
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors whose contributions are accepted for publication in this journal, accept the following terms:
a. The authors retain their copyright and guarantee to the magazine the right of first publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution License Attribution-Noncommercial-No derivative works 4.0 Spain, which allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and its first publication is indicated.
b. Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements to distribute the version of the published work (e.g. deposit in an institutional repository or archive, or published in a monographic volume) provided the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
PLAGIARISM AND SCIENTIFIC FRAUD
The publication of work that infringes on intellectual property rights is the sole responsibility of the authors, including any conflicts that may occur regarding infringement of copyright. This includes, most importantly, conflicts related to the commission of plagiarism and/or scientific fraud.
Plagiarism is understood to include:
1. Presenting the work of others as your own.
2. Adopting words or ideas from other authors without due recognition.
3. Not using quotation marks or another distinctive format to distinguish literal quotations.
4. Giving incorrect information about the true source of a citation.
5. The paraphrasing of a source without mentioning the source.
6. Excessive paraphrasing, even if the source is mentioned.
Practices constituting scientific fraud are as follows:
1. Fabrication, falsification or omission of data and plagiarism.
2. Duplicate publication.
3. Conflicts of authorship.
