Ortega y la «Revolución conservadora»
Abstract
This paper tries to establish the connections between the philo-sophical and political thought of José Ortega y Gasset and the Germán Conservative Revolution, defending the hypothesis of a genera-tional link between Ortega and his Germán contemporaries. This link, based on impressions received during his first travels to Germany, is showed in his rereading of Nietzsche's legacy and in his responses in the face of the outbreak of First World War. Since 1914 Ortega has produced a political philosophy in which the language of authenticity, the attempted superation of the traditional divisions between the left and the right, or the effort to declare the death of the bourgeais age leads to a political radicalization during the years of the Second Re-public. Researches on Ortega's library and on publications edited by Revista de Occidente form the basis of this paper.Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors whose contributions are accepted for publication in this journal, accept the following terms:
a. The authors retain their copyright and guarantee to the magazine the right of first publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution License Attribution-Noncommercial-No derivative works 4.0 Spain, which allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and its first publication is indicated.
b. Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements to distribute the version of the published work (e.g. deposit in an institutional repository or archive, or published in a monographic volume) provided the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
PLAGIARISM AND SCIENTIFIC FRAUD
The publication of work that infringes on intellectual property rights is the sole responsibility of the authors, including any conflicts that may occur regarding infringement of copyright. This includes, most importantly, conflicts related to the commission of plagiarism and/or scientific fraud.
Plagiarism is understood to include:
1. Presenting the work of others as your own.
2. Adopting words or ideas from other authors without due recognition.
3. Not using quotation marks or another distinctive format to distinguish literal quotations.
4. Giving incorrect information about the true source of a citation.
5. The paraphrasing of a source without mentioning the source.
6. Excessive paraphrasing, even if the source is mentioned.
Practices constituting scientific fraud are as follows:
1. Fabrication, falsification or omission of data and plagiarism.
2. Duplicate publication.
3. Conflicts of authorship.
