Ernesto Giménez Caballero: national unity and mass politics in the works of a fascist intellectual.
Keywords:
Spain, fascism, nationalism, mass politics, interwar period.Abstract
By drawing on the works of Giménez Caballero, the first Spanish intellectual to declare his sympathy for fascism, this article endeavours to demonstrate that what attracted him to the Italian regime was its model of mass mobilization. By transferring the model to Spain, Giménez Caballero hoped that it would create as a wedge between the progressive social sectors, the workers and the republicans, who had become increasingly mobilized, and thereby defeat them with their own weapons. He was also attracted by fascist exaltation of empire as a means of strengthening Spanish national unity, which he considered problematic. On the other hand, these two goals were not very different from those aspired to by the two main leaders of the early Spanish fascist movement, Ramiro Ledesma Ramos and José Antonio Primo de Rivera.Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors whose contributions are accepted for publication in this journal, accept the following terms:
a. The authors retain their copyright and guarantee to the magazine the right of first publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution License Attribution-Noncommercial-No derivative works 4.0 Spain, which allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and its first publication is indicated.
b. Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements to distribute the version of the published work (e.g. deposit in an institutional repository or archive, or published in a monographic volume) provided the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
PLAGIARISM AND SCIENTIFIC FRAUD
The publication of work that infringes on intellectual property rights is the sole responsibility of the authors, including any conflicts that may occur regarding infringement of copyright. This includes, most importantly, conflicts related to the commission of plagiarism and/or scientific fraud.
Plagiarism is understood to include:
1. Presenting the work of others as your own.
2. Adopting words or ideas from other authors without due recognition.
3. Not using quotation marks or another distinctive format to distinguish literal quotations.
4. Giving incorrect information about the true source of a citation.
5. The paraphrasing of a source without mentioning the source.
6. Excessive paraphrasing, even if the source is mentioned.
Practices constituting scientific fraud are as follows:
1. Fabrication, falsification or omission of data and plagiarism.
2. Duplicate publication.
3. Conflicts of authorship.