Anarchist and jihadi terrorism: a comparative analysis
Keywords:
Terrorism, anarchism, jihadism, propaganda by the deed, secular religionAbstract
Anarchist terrorism of bygone and jihadi terrorism of our days show obvious differences but also some similarities. This essay analyses them focusing on four aspects: the concept of terrorism as propaganda, which was pioneered by anarchists and has inspired the spectacular attacks by Al Qaeda; the similarities and differences between anarchist and jihadi ideologies, with special reference to the religious traits of anarchism and the anarchisant traits of jihadism; the use by both of the concept of martyrdom; and finally that decentralized type of organization which was peculiar of anarchism and may become common in the new phase of the global terrorist jihad.Downloads
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Juan Avilés Farré
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc-nd/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors whose contributions are accepted for publication in this journal, accept the following terms:
a. The authors retain their copyright and guarantee to the magazine the right of first publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution License Attribution-Noncommercial-No derivative works 4.0 Spain, which allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and its first publication is indicated.
b. Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements to distribute the version of the published work (e.g. deposit in an institutional repository or archive, or published in a monographic volume) provided the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
PLAGIARISM AND SCIENTIFIC FRAUD
The publication of work that infringes on intellectual property rights is the sole responsibility of the authors, including any conflicts that may occur regarding infringement of copyright. This includes, most importantly, conflicts related to the commission of plagiarism and/or scientific fraud.
Plagiarism is understood to include:
1. Presenting the work of others as your own.
2. Adopting words or ideas from other authors without due recognition.
3. Not using quotation marks or another distinctive format to distinguish literal quotations.
4. Giving incorrect information about the true source of a citation.
5. The paraphrasing of a source without mentioning the source.
6. Excessive paraphrasing, even if the source is mentioned.
Practices constituting scientific fraud are as follows:
1. Fabrication, falsification or omission of data and plagiarism.
2. Duplicate publication.
3. Conflicts of authorship.