The «great German plague». The reception of the Eulenburg scandal in the Spanish press and the emergence of the public debate on male homosexuality
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18042/hp.2024.AL.08Abstract
This article aims to study the reception of the «Eulenburg scandal» in the Spanish press, from its appearance in Germany in 1907 after the denunciations of the journalist Maximilian Hardt published in Die Zukunft, to its subsequent echo in the years of the Great War. It is supported by a total of 300 journalistic pieces (chronicles, news, background articles, jokes, etc.) from 34 newspapers, weeklies and magazines. After synthetically exposing the episodes that mark the Eulenburg scandal and calibrating the way in which this episode contributed to spreading the category of «homosexuality» in Spain, the analysis of the journalistic discourse and its reception of the case is addressed from three shots of different position: the republican, the liberal and the conservative. The different modulations in the story of the events, in the representation of the protagonists and in the connotations of homose[1]xuality in relation to the bankruptcy of masculinity and of the nation will be analyzed. In the conclusion it is highlighted how the event, despite its resonance in Spain and turning homosexuality into a matter of political significance, would not generate concern about homosexuality as a national problem, something that would only happen in the decade of 1920.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Francisco Vázquez García
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0b52d/0b52d46edc111e449a0fbf055f579b35f69999ca" alt="Creative Commons License"
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors whose contributions are accepted for publication in this journal, accept the following terms:
a. The authors retain their copyright and guarantee to the magazine the right of first publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution License Attribution-Noncommercial-No derivative works 4.0 Spain, which allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and its first publication is indicated.
b. Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements to distribute the version of the published work (e.g. deposit in an institutional repository or archive, or published in a monographic volume) provided the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
PLAGIARISM AND SCIENTIFIC FRAUD
The publication of work that infringes on intellectual property rights is the sole responsibility of the authors, including any conflicts that may occur regarding infringement of copyright. This includes, most importantly, conflicts related to the commission of plagiarism and/or scientific fraud.
Plagiarism is understood to include:
1. Presenting the work of others as your own.
2. Adopting words or ideas from other authors without due recognition.
3. Not using quotation marks or another distinctive format to distinguish literal quotations.
4. Giving incorrect information about the true source of a citation.
5. The paraphrasing of a source without mentioning the source.
6. Excessive paraphrasing, even if the source is mentioned.
Practices constituting scientific fraud are as follows:
1. Fabrication, falsification or omission of data and plagiarism.
2. Duplicate publication.
3. Conflicts of authorship.