Quarantined democracies: policy responses to the COVID-19 and the future of democracy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22325/fes/res.2020.44Keywords:
policies, COVID-19, liberal democracy crisis, democratic innovation, local democracyAbstract
This contribution examines firstly the policies deployed by central governments around the world during the first epidemic outbreak of the COVID-19, in particular its degree of severity, and puts it in relation to the class and quality of the political regimes in those countries. According to the method followed, the main conclusion is that there is no clear correspondence between the political regime and the rigor of the measures adopted. Secondly, the text reflects on some foreseeable effects that the fight against COVID-19 could have on representative democracy and also includes a brief plea in favor of innovative democratic practices that, through stochastic procedures, stimulate well-informed collective decision processes and binding,. It is presumed that such practices, deployed at local levels, could generate self-organized citizen communities that could be an agile instrument to face more effectively and equitably the fight against future pandemic outbreaks and any other kind of contingency.
References
AUTORES
Barbeito, R.L. (2020). Facing xenophobic populism trough democratic innovation. En G. Larocca, G. (Ed.), Media, migrants, and human rights. In the evolution of the European scenario of refugees’ and asylum seekers’ instances (cap. 3, en prensa). Bern: Peter Lang.
Barbeito, R.L., Iglesias, A. (2019). Tecnologías digitales, nuevos movimientos sociales y democracia participativa: del 15-M y Podemos al proyecto de Gobierno Abierto del Ayuntamiento de Madrid. En: VVAA, Intellectum Valde Ama. Ama intensamente la inteligencia (vol. 1, pp. 1 376-1 388). Madrid: Rafael Lazcano Editor.
Bartlett, J. (2019). The people vs. tech. How the internet is killing democracy (and how we can save it). London: Ebury Publishing.
Berman, Sh. (2020). Democracy, authoritarianism and crises. Social Europe (en línea). https://www.socialeurope.eu/democracy-authoritarianism-and-crises, acceso el 20 de abril de 2020.
Bouricius, T. (2019). Why hybrid bicameralism is not right for sortition. En J. Gastil, E.O. Wright (Eds.), Legislature by lot. Transformative designs for deliberative governance (pp. 313-332). London: Verso.
Castells, M. (2017). Ruptura. La crisis de la democracia liberal. Madrid: Alianza.
Chomsky, N. (2018). Malestar global. Madrid: Sexto Piso.
Crouch, C. (2004). Posdemocracia. Madrid: Taurus.
Dahl, R. (1989). Democracy and its critics. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Foa, R.S., Klassen, A., Slade, M., Rand, A. and Collins, R. (2020). The global satisfaction with democracy report 2020. Cambridge: Centre for the Future of Democracy, Cambridge University.
Freedom House (2020). Freedom in the World 2020. Washington, DC: Freedom House.
Gardels, N., Berggruen, N. (2019). Renovating democracy governing in the age of globalization and digital capitalism. Oakland: University of California Press.
Gil Calvo, E. (2018). Comunicación política. Madrid: Catarata.
Hale, Th., Angrist, N., Kira, B., Pheterick, A., Phillips, T., Webster, S. (2020). Variations in government responses to Covid-19 (v. 5). BSG Working Paper, 32 (en línea). https://www.bsg.ox.ac.uk/research/publications/variation-government-responses-covid-19, acceso 1 de mayo 2020.
Iglesias, A., Barbeito, R.L. (2020). Participatory democracy in local government: An exploratory assessment of the use of an online platform in the city of Madrid. Croatian and Comparative Public Administration, 20(2) (en prensa).
Iglesias, A., Barbeito, R.L. (2016). Does e-participation influence and improve political decision-making processes? Evidence from a local government. Lex Localis – Journal of Local Self-Government, 14(4), 873-891.
Klein, N. (2014). This changes everything: Capitalism vs. the climate. London: Penguin.
Lürhmann, A. (Ed.) (2019). Democracy facing global challenges: V-Dem annual democracy report 2019. Gothenburg: V-Dem Institute, Universidad de Gothenburg.
Mair, P. (2013). Ruling the void: The hollowing of Western democracy. London: Verso.
Manin, B. (1998). Los principios del gobierno representativo. Madrid: Alianza.
Mason, P. (2015). Postcapitalism. London: Allen Lane.
Moreno, L., Jiménez, R. (2018). Democracias robotizadas. Escenarios futuros en Estados Unidos y la Unión Europea. Madrid: Catarata.
Mounk, Y. (2018). El pueblo contra la democracia: Por qué nuestra libertad está en peligro y cómo salvarla. Barcelona: Paidós.
OCDE (2020). Country Policy Tracker (en línea). http://oecd.org/coronavirus/en/#country-policy-tracker, acceso el 6 de mayo de 2020.
OMS (2020a). Strategic Preparedness and Response Plan: 2019 Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV). First draft plan updated 3 February 2020. New York: World Health Organization.
OMS (2020b). Covid-19 Strategy Up-dated 14th April (en línea). https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/covid-strategy-update-14april2020.pdf?sfvrsn=29da3ba0_19, acceso el 2 de mayo de 2020.
OMS (2020c). Strengthening Preparedness for COVID-19 in Cities and Urban Settings (en línea). https://www.who.int/publications-detail/strengthening-preparedness-for-covid-19-in-cities-and-urban-settings, acceso el 2 de mayo de 2020.
O´Neil, C. (2016). Weapons of math destruction: How big data increases inequality and threatens democracy. New York: Random House.
Ortega, F. (2011). La política mediatizada. Madrid: Alianza.
Ortiz, I., Burke, S., Berrada, M., Cortes, H. (2013). World protest 2006-2013. New York: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung.
Pogány, S. (2020). The coronavirus and the ‘quarantining’ of Hungarian democracy. Social Europe (en línea). https://www.socialeurope.eu/the-coronavirus-and-the-quarantining-of-hungarian-democracy, acceso el 16 de abril de 2020.
Repucci, S. (2020). Freedom in the world 2020: A leaderless struggle for democracy. Washington, DC: Freedom House.
Roethig, O. (2020). Resilience in the corona crisis—strongest where workers enjoy collective power. Social Europe (en línea). https://www.socialeurope.eu/resilience-in-the-corona-crisis-strongest-where-workers-enjoy-collective-power, acceso el 25 de abril de 2020.
Schwanholz, J., Graham, T., Stoll, P.T. (Eds.) (2018). Managing democracy in the digital age: Internet regulation, social media use, and online civic engagement. New York: Springer.
Sintomer, Y. (2019). From deliberative to radical democracy: Sortition and politics in the twenty-first century. En J. Gastil,, E.O. Wright (Eds.), Legislature by lot. Transformative designs for deliberative governance (pp. 47-73). London: Verso.
Stephens-Davidowitz, S. (2017). Everybody lies: Big data, new data, and what the internet reveals about who we really are. New York: Harper Collins.
University of Oxford (2020). Coronavirus Government Response Tracker (en línea). https://www.bsg.ox.ac.uk/research/research-projects/coronavirus-government-response-tracker, acceso el 6 de mayo 2020.
V-DEM (2019). Democracy Facing Global Challenges: V-DEM Annual Democracy Report 2019. Gothenburg: Varieties of Democracy Institute, University of Gothenburg.
Wallerstein, I. (2009). El futuro de la civilización capitalista. Madrid: Icaria.
World Justice Project (2019). WJP Rule of Law Index 2019. Washington, DC: World Justice Project.
Wrigth, E.O. (2014). Construyendo utopías reales. Akal: Madrid.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
• The transfer of the copyright of the article to Revista Española de Sociología.
• The assignment to the Revista Española de Sociología of the rights of commercial exploitation of the article to third parties both in the offset and digital formats, as well as to the search engines and platforms that may serve as intermediaries for the sale or knowledge of the article.
