Occupational welfare: conceptual delimitation and key variables for its development
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22325/fes/res.2020.17Keywords:
Occupational welfare, social protection, social division of welfare, employers, conceptualization.Abstract
The article explores two key aspects of occupational welfare (OW): its conceptualization; and the main explanatory variables behind its development. The idea of OW is examined as well as its connections and interactions with other sources of welfare provision. Four conceptual elaborations of OW are identified and compared, detailing its main differences and overlapping similarities. Second, the article synthesises the main results on OW available in the international literature, thus contributing to a better understanding of the progress of OW in Spain within the European context. The main explanatory variables for the development of occupational social protection schemes are also identified and explained in detail. The article contributes to the most recent and innovative research agenda on welfare, which conceives the architecture of post-industrial social protection systems as a changing institutional balance resulting from the combination of conventional and non-conventional sources of welfare.
References
Ascoli, U., Natali, D., Pavolini, E. (2018). Still a weak occupational welfare in Southern Europe? Evidence from the Italian case. Social Policy & Administration, 52(2), 534-548.
Blank, F. (2018). With or without you – Occupational welfare and public social policy in Germany. En D. Natali, E. Pavolini, E. (Eds.), Occupational Welfare in Europe: Risks, opportunities and social partner involvement (103-123). Bruselas: ETUI.
Bravo Fernández, C., de Lara Guarch, A. (2018), La previsión social complementaria en España: Estado de situación y expectativas ¿infundadas? Actuarios, 42, 34-40.
Brunsdon, E., May, M. (2007). Occupational welfare. En M. Powell (Ed.), Understanding the Mixed Economy of Welfare, (149-176). Bristol: Policy Press.
Deacon, A. (1993). Richard Timuss: 20 years on. Journal of Social Policy, 22 (2), 235-242.
Deacon, A. (2002). Perspectives on Welfare. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Dixon, J., Hyde, M. (2003). Welfare retrenchment or social citizenship? Ideology and the privatization of social protection. International Journal of Social Economics, 30 (5), 633-650.
Ebbinghaus, B. (2011a). The Varieties of Pension Governance. Pension Privatization in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ebbinghaus, B. (2011b). The role of trade unions in European pension reforms: From ‘old’to ‘new’politics? European Journal of Industrial Relations, 17(4), 315-331.
Ebbinghaus, B., Manow, P. (2001). Introduction: studying varieties of welfare capitalism. En B. Ebbinghaus, P. Manow (Eds.), Comparing Welfare Capitalism (pp. 1-24). London: Routledge.
Farnsworth, K. (2012). Social versus Corporate Welfare. Houndmills: Palgrave.
Ferrera, M. (2005). The boundaries of Welfare. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gal, J., Bargal, D. (2002). Critical junctures, labor movements and the development of occupational welfare in Israel, Social Problems, 49(3), 432-454.
Goodin, R., Rein, M. (2001). Regime on pillars. Alternative welfare state logics and dynamics. Public Administration, 79 (4), 769-801.
Greve, B. (1994). The hidden Welfare State. Scandinavian Journal of Social Policy, 4, 203-211.
Greve, B. (2007). Occupational welfare: winners and losers. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Greve, B. (2008). What is Welfare? Central European Journal of Public Policy, 2 (1), 50-73.
Grødem, A. S., Hagelund, A., Hippe, J. M., Trampusch, C. (2018). Beyond coverage: the politics of occupational pensions and the role of trade unions. Introduction to special issue. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 24(1), 9-23
Hemericjk, A. (2015). European welfare states in motion. En J. Magone (Ed.), Routledge Handbook of European Politics (pp. 611-640). London: Routledge.
Hoven, F.H. (1982). Regressive Welfare. Distribution Effects of Occupational Welfare Benefits. Acta Sociologica, 25(1), 65–73.
Howard, C. (1998). The Hidden Welfare State: Tax Expenditures and Social Policy in the US. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Hyde, M., Dixon, J. (2001). Welfare ideology, the market and social security: towards a typology of market oriented reform. En J. Dixon, M. Hyde (Eds), The Marketisation of Social Security, (pp. 1-26). Wesport CT: Greenwood.
Jessoula, M. (2018). Pension multi-pillarisation in Italy: actors,‘institutional gates’ and the ‘new politics’ of funded pensions. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 24(1), 73-89.
Johnston, A., Kornelakis, A., d’Acri, C. R. (2011). Social partners and the welfare state: Recalibration, privatization or collectivization of social risks? European Journal of Industrial Relations, 17(4), 349-364.
Keune, M. (2018). Opportunity or threat? How trade union power and preferences shape occupational pensions. Social Policy & Administration, 52(2), 463-476.
Mapelli, L. (2017). The development and determinants of ‘occupational welfare’ in the recalibration of European welfare regimes: a comparative perspective. Working Paper 2WEL 1/2017, Torino/Brussels, Centro Einaudi and European Social Observatory, November, 29p.
Mares, I. (2003). The Politics of Social Risk. Business and Welfare State Development. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Martínez Poza, A. (2018). Protecting occupational pensions and unemployment benefits in Spain: a weak Occupational Welfare system. En D. Natali, E. Pavolini (Coord.) Occupational Welfare in Europe: Risks, opportunities and social partner involvement (193-213). Bruselas: ETUI.
May, M., Brunsdon, E. (1994). Workplace care in the mixed economy of welfare. Social Policy Review, 6, 146-169.
May, M., Brunsdon, E. (1999). Commercial and occupational welfare. En R.M. Page, R. Silburn (Eds.), British Social Welfare in the Twentieth Century (pp. 271-298). Houndsmills: MacMillan.
Murlis, H. (1974). Employee Benefits Today. London: British Institute of Management.
Natali, D., Pavolini, E. (2018). Occupational Welfare in Europe: state of play, determinants and policy implications. En D. Natali et al. (Eds.) Occupational Welfare in Europe: Risks, opportunities and social partner involvement (239-257). Bruselas, ETUI.
Natali, D., Keune, M., Pavolini, E., Seeleib-Kaiser, M. (2018). Sixty years after Titmuss: New findings on occupational welfare in Europe. Social Policy & Administration, 52(2), 435-448.
Natali, D., Pavolini, E. (2014). Comparing (Voluntary) Occupational Welfare in the EU: Evidence from an international research study. OSE Research Paper 16, November.
Pavolini, E., Seeleib-Kaiser, M. (2018). Comparing occupational welfare in Europe: the case of occupational pensions. Social Policy and Administration, 52 (2), 477-490.
Pérez-Bedmar, M. de S.; Suárez Corujo, B., de la Puebla Pinilla, A. (2006). La protección social complementaria en la negociación colectiva. En R. Escudero Rodríguez (Coord.), La negociación colectiva en España: una mirada crítica (pp. 487-509). Valencia: Tirant lo Blanch.
Shalev, M. (ed.) (1996). The privatization of social policy? Occupational welfare and the welfare state in America, Scandinavia and Japan. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Sinfield, A. (1978). Analysis in the social division of welfare. Journal of Social Policy, 7(2), 129-156.
Titmuss, R. (1958). Essays on the Welfare State. London: Allen and Unwin.
Trampusch, C. (2007). Industrial relations as a source of social policy: A typology of the institutional conditions for industrial agreements on social benefits. Social Policy & Administration, 41(3), 251-270
Trampusch, C. (2013). Employers and collectively negotiated occupational pensions in Sweden, Denmark and Norway: promoters, vacillators and adversaries. European Journal of Industrial Relations, 19 (1), 37-53.
Waine, T.C.B. (2001). Social insecurity and the retreat from social democracy: occupational welfare in the long boom and financialization. Review of International Political Economy, 8(1), 96-118.
Welshman, J. (2004). The unknown Titmuss. Journal of Social Policy, 33 (2), 225-247.
Wiß, T. (2018). Divergent occupational pensions in Bismarckian countries: the case of Germany and Austria. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 24(1), 91-107.
Yerkes, M., Tijdens, K. (2010). Social risks protection on collective agreements: evidence for Netherlands. European Journal of Industrial Relations, 16(4), 369-383.
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
• The transfer of the copyright of the article to Revista Española de Sociología.
• The assignment to the Revista Española de Sociología of the rights of commercial exploitation of the article to third parties both in the offset and digital formats, as well as to the search engines and platforms that may serve as intermediaries for the sale or knowledge of the article.