The representation of business interests during the COVID-19 pandemic in Spain

Authors

  • Laura Chaqués-Bonafont University of Barcelona and BEI
  • Iván Medina University of Valencia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21308/recp.57.01

Keywords:

business associations, COVID-19, interest groups, parliamentary lobbying, government

Abstract

This article explains the representation of business interest during the COVID-19 pandemic. The article describes how business interests get into the policy process across policy areas and political venues. Following previous studies (Dür and Mateo, 2016), the article argues the COVID-19 pandemic did not alter business groups’ position in the policymaking process. Business groups occupy a predominant role in the discussion of policy proposals vis-à-vis other types of groups during the COVID-19 in the governmental arena, and this is especially the case for economy related policies and agriculture affairs. In contrast, business groups occupy a secondary role in the parliamentary arena, especially for non-economic issues. The article also explains which business associations represent business interest during the COVID-19 pandemic. The empirical strategy relies on two datasets developed by the Quality of Democracy Research Group (www.q-dem.com) containing information about interest groups’ mobilization in the Spanish Congress of Deputies and the Spanish government from March 2020 to March 2021.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aguilar, Susana. 2020. “Interest groups, business associations and trade unions”, in D. Muro and I. Lago (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Spanish Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198826934.013.25.

Baumgartner, Frank R. and Beth L. Leech. 2001. “Interest Niches and Policy Bandwagons: Patterns of Interest Group Involvement in National Politics”, The Journal of Politics, 63: 1191-1213. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-3816.00106.

Baumgartner, Frank R. and Bryan Jones. 2005. The Politics of Attention: How Government Prioritizes Problems. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Baumgartner, Frank R., Jeffrey M. Berry, Marie Hojnacki, Beth L. Leech and David C. Kimball. 2009. Lobbying and policy change: Who wins, who loses, and why. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226039466.001.0001.

Bell, Stephen. 2012. “The Power of Ideas: The Ideational Shaping of the Structural Power of Business”, International Studies Quarterly, 56: 661-673. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2478.2012.00743.x.

Belzunegui-Eraso, Ángel and Amaya Erro-Garcés. 2020. “Teleworking in the Context of the COVID-19 Crisis”, Sustainability, 12 (9): 1-18. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093662.

Bernhagen, Patrick. 2007. The Political Power of Business: Structure and Information in Public Policymaking. London: Routledge. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203932612.

Beyers, Jan, Laura Chaqués-Bonafont, Andreas Dür, Rainer Eising, Danika Fink-Hafner, David Lowery, William Mahoney, Chistine Maloney and Daniel Naurin. 2014. “The INTEREURO Project: Logic and structure”, Interest Groups and Advocacy, 3 (2): 126-140. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1057/iga.2014.8.

Binderkrantz, Anne S., Peter M. Christiansen and Helene H. Pedersen. 2015. “Interest Group Access to the Bureaucracy, Parliament, and the Media”, Governance, 28 (1): 95-112. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12089.

Binderkrantz, Anne S., Peter M. Christiansen and Helene H. Pedersen. 2020. “Mapping interest group access to politics: a presentation of the INTERARENA research project”, Interest Groups and Advocacy 9 (3): 290-301. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41309-020-00095-9.

Bouwen, Pieter. 2002. “Corporate lobbying in the European Union: The logic of access”, Journal of European Public Policy, 9 (3): 365-390. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760210138796.

Chaqués-Bonafont, Laura. 2004. Redes de políticas públicas. Madrid: Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas.

Chaqués-Bonafont, Laura. 2020. “Interest groups and political representation”, in M. Cotta and F. Russo (eds.), Handbook of Political Representation. Edward Elgar Publishing. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788977098.00033.

Chaqués-Bonafont, Laura and Luz M. Muñoz. 2016. “Explaining interest group access to parliamentary committees”, West European Politics, 39 (6): 1276-1298. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2016.1184862.

Coen, David and Alexander Katsaitis. 2013. “Chameleon pluralism in the EU: an empirical study of the European Commission interest group density and diversity across policy domains”, Journal of European Public Policy 20 (8): 1104-1119. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2013.781785.

Coen, David and Wyn Grant. 2006. “Managing business and government relations”, in D. Coen and W. Grant (eds.), Business and Government: Methods and Practice. IPSA 2000 Series. Opladen: Barbara Budrich. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvddzw1n.

Coen, David, and Jeremy Richardson (eds.). 2009. Lobbying the European Union: Institutions, Actors, and Issue. New York: Oxford University Press.

Dür, Andreas and Gemma Mateo. 2013. “Gaining Access or Going Public? Interest Group Strategies in Five European Countries”, European Journal of Political Research 52 (5): 660-686. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198785651.001.0001.

Dür, Andreas and Gemma Mateo. 2016. Insiders versus Outsiders: Interest Group Politics in Multilevel Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198785651.001.0001.

Dür, Andreas, David Marshall and Patrick Bernhagen. 2019. The Political Influence of Business in the European Union. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Eising, Rainer and Florian Spohr. 2017. “The More, the Merrier? Interest Groups and Legislative Change in the Public Hearings of the German Parliamentary Committees”, German Politics, 26 (2): 314-333. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/09644008.2016.1213244.

Fraussen, Bert, Jan Beyers and Tom Donas. 2015. “The Expanding Core and Varying Degrees of Insiderness: Institutionalised Interest Group Access to Advisory Councils”, Political Studies, 63 (3): 569-588. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12112.

Gilens, Martin and Benjamin I. Page. 2014. “Testing Theories of American Politics: Elites, Interest Groups, and Average Citizens”, Perspectives on Politics, 12 (3): 564-581. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592714001595.

Gómez Funes, Andrés. 2020. Generación, género y tecnología en las organizaciones empresariales españolas (1998-2018) [unpublished PhD. Dissertation].

Hanegraaff, Marcel and Joost Berkhout. 2019. “More business as usual? Explaining business bias across issues and institutions in the European Union”, Journal of European Public Policy, 26 (6): 843-862. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2018.1492006.

Junk, Wiebke M., Michele Crepaz, Marcel Hanegraaff, Joost Berkhout and Ellis Aizenberg. 2021. “Changes in interest group access in times of crisis: no pain, no (lobby) gain”, Journal of European Public Policy. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2021.1968936.

Kohler-Koch, Beate, Peter Kotzian and Christine Quittkat. 2017. “The Multilevel Interest Representation of National Business Associations”, West European Politics, 40 (5): 1046-1065. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2017.1303244.

LaPira, Timothy M. 2014. “Lobbying after 9/11: Policy regime emergence and interest group mobilization”, Policy Studies Journal, 42 (2): 226-251. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12057.

Marsh, David and Chris Lewis. 2013. “The Political Power of Big Business: A Response to Bell and Hindmoor”, New Political Economy, 19 (4): 628-633. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2013.829435.

Marsh, David and R. A. W. Rhodes (eds.). 1992. Policy Networks in British Government. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198278528.001.0001.

McFarland, Andrew S. 2004. Neopluralism: The Evolution of Political Process Theory. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.

Medina, Iván. 2016. “Are Business Associations Involved in Regional Politics? Evidence from Spain and the United Kingdom”, European Urban and Regional Studies, 23 (3): 389-405. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776413513603.

Medina, Iván and Joaquim M. Molins. 2021. “Institutional Change in Spanish Chambers of Commerce”, in D. Sack (ed.), Chambers of Commerce in Europe. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62700-3_5.

Molina, Oscar. 2021. Spain: Working life in the COVID-19 pandemic 2020. Eurofund Working Paper.

Pakull, Dominic, David Marshall and Patrick Bernhagen. 2020. “Shop till you drop? Venue choices of business and non-business interests in the European Union”, Interest Groups and Advocacy, 9: 520-540. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41309-020-00092-y.

Pedersen, Helene H., Anne S. Binderkrantz and Peter M. Christiansen. 2014. “Legislative Process in Denmark”, Legislative Studies Quarterly, 39: 199-225. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/lsq.12042.

Rhodes, R. A. W. 2006. “Policy Network Analysis”, in M. Moran, M. Rein and R. E. Goodin (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Public Policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Richardson, Jeremy and Grant Jordan. 1979. Governing Under Pressure. Oxford: Martin Roberson.

Rodríguez, Diego. 2020. Teletrabajo, acceso a Internet y apoyo a la digitalización en el contexto del COVID-19. FEDEA report, No. 2020-08.

Salisbury, Robert H. 1969. “An Exchange Theory of Interest Groups”, Midwest Journal of Political Science, 13 (1): 1-32. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/2110212.

Schattschneider, Elmer E. 1960. The Semisovereign People: A Realist’s View of Democracy in America. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

Schneider, Volker. 2006. “Business in Policy Networks: Estimating the Relative Importance of Corporate Direct Lobbying and Representation by Trade Associations”, in D. Coen and W. Grant (eds.), Business and Government: Methods and Practice. IPSA 2000 Series. Opladen: Barbara Budrich. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvddzw1n.10.

Published

2021-11-29

How to Cite

Chaqués-Bonafont, L., & Medina, I. (2021). The representation of business interests during the COVID-19 pandemic in Spain. Revista Española De Ciencia Política, (57), 21–44. https://doi.org/10.21308/recp.57.01

Issue

Section

Monographic Section