Change and continuity in science policy: The design of funding instruments for university research in Galicia (2005-2018)

Authors

  • Manuel Pereira-Puga Instituto de Políticas y Bienes Públicos (IPP), CSIC
  • Luis Sanz-Menéndez Instituto de Políticas y Bienes Públicos (IPP), CSIC

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21308/recp.54.06

Keywords:

policy change, critical junctures, path dependency, government organization set up, public policy instruments, R&D policy, university research, Galicia

Abstract

The objective of this research note is to study the design and evolution of the instruments for university research-funding by a regional government (Xunta de Galicia) during the period 2005-‍18. It shows the main factors and processes associated to the design of science policies from a historical perspective. For this purpose, multiple documentary sources have been analyzed and semi-structured interviews as well as meetings with actors involved in the instrument portfolio have also been carried out. The key findings show that: a) decisions about the design and implementation of instruments are influenced by continuous interactions among actors; b) the policy makers’ origins have an impact on the set up of research activities; c) institutional and organizational environments generate opportunities but, at the same time, they constrain the action of political actors; and d) behaviors oriented to reduce administrative and management costs promote the design and implementation of instruments with multiple objectives. Furthermore, it can be confirmed the structuring consequences of critical junctures on the continuity of policies and institutional and organizational designs, as well as the existence of processes of substitution and accumulation of instruments.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bachrach, Peter y Morton S. Baratz. 1963. «Decisions and Nondecisions: An Analytical Framework», The American Political Science Review, 57 (3): 632-642. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.2307/1952568.

Borrás, Susana y Jacint Jordana. 2016. «When Regional Innovation Policies Meet Policy Rationales and Evidence: A Plea for Policy Analysis», European Planning Studies, 24 (12): 2133-2153. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2016.1236074.

Braun, Dietmar y Francoise-Xavier Merrien (eds.). 1999. Towards a New Model of Governance for Universities?: A Comparative View Higher Education Policy. Londres; Filadelfia: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

Braun, Dietmar. 1993. «Who governs intermediary agencies? Principal-agent relations in research policy-making», Journal of Public Policy, 13 (2): 135-162. Disponible en: https://www.jstor.org/stable/4007501.

Capano, Giliberto y Andrea Lippi. 2017. «How Policy Instruments Are Chosen: Patterns of Decision Makers’ Choices», Policy Sciences, 50 (2): 269-293. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-016-9267-8.

Capano, Giliberto. 2018. «Policy Design Spaces in Reforming Governance in Higher Education: The Dynamics in Italy and the Netherlands», Higher Education, 75 (4): 675-94. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-017-0158-5.

Collier, Ruth Berins y David Collier. 1991. Shaping the Political Arena: Critical Junctures, the Labor Movement and Regime Dynamics in Latin America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Cruz-Castro, Laura y Luis Sanz-Menéndez. 2005. «Bringing Science and Technology Human Resources Back in: The Spanish Ramón y Cajal Programme», Science and Public Policy, 32 (1): 39-53. Disponible en: https://doi.org/ 10.3152/147154305781779687.

Cruz-Castro, Laura y Luis Sanz-Menéndez. 2018. «Autonomy and Authority in Public Research Organisations: Structure and Funding Factors», Minerva, 56 (2): 135-60. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-018-9349-1.

Cruz-Castro, Laura, Luis Sanz-Menéndez y Marta Romero. 2004. «Convergencia y divergencia en las políticas deficiencia y tecnología de los gobiernos regionales», Revista Española de Ciencia Política, 11: 31-70.

Elzinga, Aant y Andrew Jamison. 1995. «Changing Policy Agendas in Science and Technology», en Sheila M. Jasanoff, Gerald E. Markle, James C Peterson y Trevor J. Pinch (eds.), Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. Londres: SAGE Publications.

Fernández López, Sara y Alberto Vaquero García. 2013. «El modelo de financiación de la universidad gallega 2011-2015: previsión de fondos y balance», Revista Galega de Economía, 22 (1): 73-96. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.15304/rge.22.1.1270.

Fernández López, Sara y Alberto Vaquero García. 2017. «Luces y sombras del nuevo plan autonómico de financiación de las universidades gallegas (2016-2020)», Revista Galega de Economía, 26 (1): 89-104.

Fernández, María, Luis Sanz-Menéndez y Laura Cruz-Castro. 2003. «Diseño institucional y preferencias políticas: o cómo equilibrar los intereses académicos en la política de ciencia, tecnología e innovación gallega», Inguruak. Revista Vasca de Sociología y Ciencia Política, 35: 33-68.

Gerring, John. 2016. Case Study Research: Principles and Practices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316848593.

González-López, Manuel y Xulia Guntín-Araujo. 2019. «Evolución da política galega de innovación: de cero á especialización intelixente», Revista Galega de Economía, 28 (2): 23-38. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.15304/rge.28.2.6154.

González-López, Manuel. 2019. «Understanding Policy Learning in Regional Innovation Policies: Lessons from the Galician Case», Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 32 (1): 104-18. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2018.1519780.

Guntín-Araujo, Xulia y Lourenzo Fernández Prieto. 2015. «Universidades, sistema de innovación e políticas científicas e de investigación en Galicia. 25 anos da creación das novas universidades galegas», Sarmiento. Revista Galego-Portuguesa de Historia da Educación, 18-19: 7-21. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.17979/srgphe.2015. 18-19.0.4039.

Hall, Peter A. 1993. «Policy Paradigms, Social Learning, and the State: The Case of Economic Policymaking in Britain», Comparative Politics, 25 (3): 275-96. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.2307/422246.

Heinze, Thomas, Philip Shapira, Juan D. Rogers y Jacqueline M. Senker. 2009. «Organizational and institutional influences on creativity in scientific research», Research Policy, 38 (4): 610-623. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2009.01.014.

Hicks, Diana. 2012. «Performance-Based University Research Funding Systems», Research Policy, 41 (2): 251-61. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.09.007.

Hood, Christopher C. y Helen Z. Margetts. 2007. The tools of government in the digital age. Nueva York, NY: Macmillan International Higher Education.

Howlett, Michael. 2000. «Managing the «hollow state»: Procedural policy instruments and modern governance», Canadian Public Administration, 43 (4): 412-431. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-7121.2000.tb01152.x.

Larrán-Jorge, Manuel y Ángel García-Correas. 2015. «¿Influyen los modelos de financiación autonómicos en la eficiencia de las universidades públicas españolas?», Revista de Contabilidad, 18 (2): 162-173. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcsar.2014.06.001.

Mackie, John L., 1965. «Causes and Conditions», American Philosophical Quarterly, 12: 245-265. Disponible en: https://www.jstor.org/stable/20009173.

Observatori del Sistema Universitario (OSU). 2017. ¿Quién financia la universidad? Comparación entre comunidades autónomas en España, Europa y la OCDE, 2009-2015.

Pérez-Esparrells, Carmen, Eva de la Torre y José María Gómez-Sancho. 2018. «La relevancia de la financiación pública en las universidades españolas», Presupuesto y Gasto Público, 90: 169-190.

Peters, B. Guy. 2000. «Policy instruments and public management: bridging the gaps», Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10 (1): 35-47. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024265.

Peters, B. Guy. 2018. Policy Problems and Policy Design. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgard. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781786431356.

Pierson, Paul. 2000. «Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics», American Political Science Review, 94 (2): 251-267. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.2307/2586011.

Pierson, Paul. 2004. Politics in Time: History, Institutions, and social Analysis. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Ragin, Charles C. 2000. Redesigning Social Research. Fuzzy-Set Social Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Rayner, Jeremy y Michael Howlett. 2009. «Introduction: Understanding integrated policy strategies and their evolution», Policy and Society, 28 (2): 99-109. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polsoc.2009.05.001.

Rose, Richard. 1994. Inheritance in Public Policy: Change Without Choice in Britain. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Sabatier, Paul A. 1988. «An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein», Policy Sciences, 21 (2-3): 129-168. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00136406.

Sanz-Menéndez, Luis y Laura Cruz-Castro. 2005. «Explaining the Science and Technology Policies of Regional Governments», Regional Studies, 39 (7): 939-954. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400500289945.

Schneider, Mark y Paul Teske. 1992. «Toward a theory of the political entrepreneur: evidence from local government», American Political Science Review, 86 (3): 737-747. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.2307/1964135.

Seawright, Jason, y John Gerring. 2008. «Case Selection Techniques in Case Study Research: A Menu of Qualitative and Quantitative Options», Political Research Quarterly, 61 (2): 294-308. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912907313077.

Stinchcombe, Arthur L. 2005. The Logic of Social Research. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Taylor, Mark Z. 2016. The Politics of Innovation: Why Some Countries Are Better Than Others at Science and Technology. Nueva York: Oxford University Press. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190464127.001.0001.

Vedung, Evert. 1998. «Policy Instruments: Typologies and Theories», en Marie-Louise Bemelmans-Videc, Ray C. Rist y Evert Vedung (eds.), Carrots, Sticks and Sermons: Policy Instruments and Their Evaluation. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.

Vence Deza, Xavier. 2010. «Sistema gallego de innovación y políticas de innovación: balance de una década», Revista Galega de Economía, 19, 1-30.

Whitley, Richard. 2007. «The changing governance of the sciences», en Richard Whitley y Jochen Gläser (eds.), The Changing Governance of the Sciences: The Advent of Research Evaluation Systems. Dordrecht: Springer. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6746-4.

Whitley, Richard. 2011. «Changing governance and authority relations in the public sciences», Minerva, 49 (4): 359-385. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-011-9182-2.

Published

2020-11-30

How to Cite

Pereira-Puga, M., & Sanz-Menéndez, L. (2020). Change and continuity in science policy: The design of funding instruments for university research in Galicia (2005-2018). Revista Española De Ciencia Política, (54), 151–171. https://doi.org/10.21308/recp.54.06

Issue

Section

Research Notes