Parties of internal creation under dictatorships: Advanced and moderate liberals during the period of the Royal Statute in Spain (1834-1836)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21308/recp.53.04Keywords:
long-lasting coalition, distributive conflict, multidimensional space, strategic votingAbstract
According to the current research on parties in dictatorships, the origin of parties is the result of the action by autocrats and individuals excluded from parliamentary representation. The hypothesis that parties are created in elected chambers through legislative coalitions has not been examined. However, the incentives and information predicted by the long-lasting coalition model can also occur in these chambers. That implies that parliaments can become a multidimensional space with distributive conflicts where sophisticated voting takes place. In order to test this hypothesis, this article analyzes the coalitions of advanced and moderate liberals within the Estamento de Procuradores during the regime of the Royal Statute (1834-1836). The results clearly show that the procuradores turned that elected chamber into a multidimensional space where distributive conflicts arose, and strategic voting was used. Nominal votes recorded in the Diario de Sesiones de Cortes del Estatuto Real. Estamento de Procuradores (1834-35, 1835-36 and 1836 terms) are the main source of information.
Downloads
References
Adame de Heu, Wladimiro. 1997. Sobre los orígenes del liberalismo histórico consolidado en España (1835-1840). Sevilla: Universidad de Sevilla.
Agesta, Luis. 1977. «El origen de los partidos políticos en la España del siglo XIX», en José Luis Aranguren et al., Historia Social de España. Madrid: Guadiana.
Aldrich, John. 1995. Why Parties? The Origin and Transformation of Political Parties in America. Chicago: The University Chicago Press. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226012773.001.0001.
Aldrich, John. 2011. Why Parties? A Second Look. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226012759.001.0001.
Aprile, Sylvie, Jean-Claude Caron y Enmanuel Fureix. 2013. La liberté guidant les peuples. Les révolutions e 1830 en Europe. Seyssel: Camp Vallon.
Armstromg II, David, Ryan Bakker, Royce Carroll, Christopher Hare, Keith Poole y Howard Roshental. 2014. Analyzing Spatial Models of Choice and Judgment with R. Boca Raton, Londres, Nueva York: CRC Press.
Artola, Miguel. 1974. Partidos y programas políticos, 1808-1936. Madrid: Aguilar.
Artola, Miguel. 1986. La hacienda del siglo XIX: progresistas y moderados. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.
Arrow, Kenneth. 1963. Social Choice and Individual Values. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Blanco, Roberto. 2010. La construcción de la libertad: apuntes para una historia del constitucionalismo europeo. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.
Boix, Carles, Michael K. Miller y Sebastian Rosato. 2013. «A complete data set of political regimes, 1800-2007», Comparative Political Studies, 46: 1523-1554. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414012463905.
Burdiel, Isabel. 1987. La política de los notables. Moderados y avanzados durante el Régimen del Estatuto Real (1834-1836). Valencia: Edicions Alfons El Magnànim.
Caron, Jean-Claude y Jean-Philippe Luis (dirs.). 2015. Rien appris, rien oublié? Les Restaurations dans L´Europe postnapoléonienne (1814-1830). Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.4000/books.pur.95956.
Colomer, Josep. 2009. Manual de ciencia política. Barcelona: Ariel.
Duverger, Maurice. 1987. Los partidos políticos. México DF: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Fontana, Josep. 1973. Hacienda y Estado en la crisis del Antiguo Régimen español: 1923-1933. Madrid: Instituto de Estudios Fiscales.
Fontana, Josep. 1977. La revolución liberal. Política y Hacienda en 1833-1845. Madrid: Instituto de Estudios Fiscales.
Gandhi, Jennifer. 2008. Political Institutions under Dictatorship. Nueva York: Cambridge University Press. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511510090.
Gandhi, Jennifer y Adam Pzeworski. 2007. «Authoritarian Institutions and the Survival of Autocrats», Comparative Political Studies, 40: 1279-1301. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414007305817.
Garzón, Juan Sisinio P. 1978. Milicia nacional y revolución burguesa: el prototipo madrileño. 1808-1874. Madrid: CSIC.
Geddes, Barbara, 1999. «What Do We Know about Democratization after Twenty Years?», Annual Review of Political Science, 2: 115-44. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.2.1.115.
Geddes, Barbara. 2005. «Why Parties and Elections in Authoritarian Regimes». Paper prepared for the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington DC.
Geddes, Barbara. 2008. «Party Creation as an Autocratic Survival Strategy». Unpublished manuscript, UCLA.
Geddes, Barbara, Joseph Wright y Erica Frantz. 2018. How Dictatorships Work. Power, Personalization, and Collapse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316336182.
Gerring, John. 2007. Case Study Research: Principles and Practices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hinich, Melvin y Michael Munger. 1997. Analytical Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139174725.
Huntington, Samuel. 1994. La tercera ola. La democratización a finales del siglo XX. Barcelona: Paidós.
Janke, Peter. 1974. Mendizábal y la instauración de la monarquía constitucional en España (1790-1853). Madrid: Siglo XXI.
Marcuello, Juan Ignacio. 1986. La práctica parlamentaria en el reinado de Isabel II. Madrid: Congreso de los Diputados.
Marichal, Carlos. 1980. La revolución liberal y los primeros partidos políticos en España: 1834-1844. Madrid: Cátedra.
Mckelvey, Richard. 1976. «Intransivities in Multidimensional Voting Models and some Implicatioms for Agenda Control», Journal of Economic Theory, 12: 472-482. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0531(76)90040-5.
Monerri, Beatriz. 2017. Las Cortes del Estatuto Real (1834-1836). Universidad Complutense, Madrid.
Montañes, Enrique. 2016. «Deuda pública y cambio político. Los acreedores y la crisis del Estatuto Real, 1834-1835», en Salvador Calatayud, Jesús Millán y María Cruz (eds.), El Estado desde la sociedad. Espacios de poder en la España del siglo XIX. Alicante: Universidad de Alicante.
Mueller, Dennis C. 2003. Public Choice III. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813771.
Plott, Charles. 1967. «A Notion of Equilibrium and Its Possibility under Majority Rules», American Economic Review, 57: 787-806.
Poole, Keith. 2005. Spatial Models of Parliamentary Voting. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511614644.
Poole, Keith y Howard Rosenthal. 1997. Congress. A Polical-Economic History of Roll Call Voting. Nueva York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Poole, Keith, Jeffrey Lewis, James Lo y Royce Carroll. 2011. «Scaling Roll Call Votes with nominate in R», Journal of Statistical Software, 42: 1-21. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1276082.
Prutsch, Markus. 2013. Making Sense of Constitutional Monarchism in Post-Napoleonic France and Germany. Basingstoke (etc.): Palgrave Macmillan. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137291653.
Riker, William. 1980 «Implications from Disequilibrium of Majority Rue for the Study of Institutions», American Political Science Review, 74: 432-446. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137271327.
Rohlfing, Ingo. 2012. Case Studies and Causal Inference. An integrative Framework. Basingstoke (etc.): Palgrave Macmillan. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137271327.
Rosanvallon, Pierre. 1994. La monarchie imposible. Les chartes de 1814 et de 1830. París: Éditions Fayard.
Schedler, Andreas. 2013. The Politics of Uncertainty: Sustaining and Subverting Electoral Authoritarianism. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199680320.001.0001.
Shepsle, Kenneth.1986. «Institutional Equilibrium and Equilibrium Institutions», en Herbert Weisberg (ed.), Political Science: The Science of Politics. Nueva York: Agathon.
Shepsle, Kenneth. 1989. «Studying Institutions: some Lessons from a Rational Choice Approach», Journal of Theoretical Politics, 1: 131-142. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1177/0951692889001002002.
Shepsle, Kenneth y Mark Bonchek. 1997. Analyzing Politics. Rationality, Behavior, and Institutions. Nueva York: Norton and Company.
Tomás y Valiente, Francisco. 1972. El marco político de la desamortización en España. Barcelona: Ariel.
Villarroya, Joaquín T. 1968. El sistema político el Estatuto Real (1834-1836). Madrid: Instituto de Estudios Políticos.
Weingast, Barry.1996. «Political Institutions: Rational Choice Perspectives», en Robert Goodin y Hans-Dieter Kilingemn (eds.), New Handbook of Political Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 pedro lago peñas
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc-nd/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.