Presidents versus foreign offices: The formulation of foreign policy in Brazil and Chile between 1990 and 2010

Authors

  • Pablo Valenzuela Centro de Estudios de la Actualidad Nacional, Escuela de Periodismo, Facultad de Humanidades, Universidad de Santiago de Chile.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21308/recp.49.03

Keywords:

Ministries, foreign policy, foreign policy analysis, Brazil, Chile.

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to explain the different role and influence exercised by Brazil’s and Chile’s Foreign Offices (or Chancelleries) during the formulation and implementation of their foreign policy. To this aim, it examines one relevant case in each country, applying a model of analysis based on the bureaucratic politics. Particular attention is paid to three dimensions: these ministries’ greater or lesser capacity to centralize and coordinate the international policy agenda; their degree of integration with or isolation from the rest of the public administration, and the professionalization of the diplomatic service. It concludes that the first two are the most relevant explanatory variables, while the third dimension can also boost the former ones. The application of this explanatory framework to the comparative analysis of both cases shows interesting contrasts in the way that Chile and Brazil formulate their respective foreign policies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Pablo Valenzuela , Centro de Estudios de la Actualidad Nacional, Escuela de Periodismo, Facultad de Humanidades, Universidad de Santiago de Chile.

Licenciado en ciencias políticas y gubernamentales, Magister en ciencia política de la Universidad de Chile. 

Investigador del Centro de Estudios de la Actualidad Nacional de la Escuela de Periodismo de la Facultad de Humanidades de la Universidad de Santiago de Chile. 

References

Alden, Cris y Amnon Aran. 2012. Foreign policy analysis: new approaches. Abingdon: Routledge.

Batista, Paulo Nogueira. 2009. «A Política Externa de Collor: Modernização ou Retrocesso?», en Pensando O Brasil. Ensaios e Palestras, de Paulo Nogueira Batista Jr. Brasilia: Fundação Alexandre de Gusmão.

Beasley, Ryan, Juliet Kaarbo, Charles Hermann y Margaret Hermann. 2001. «People and Processes in Foreign Policymaking: Insights from Comparative Case Studies», International Studies Review, 3 (2): 217-250. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1111/1521-9488.00238.

Brands, Hal. 2011. «Evaluating Brazilian Grand Strategy under Lula», Comparative Strategy, 30 (1): 28-49. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1080/01495933.2011.545686.

Breuning, Marijke. 2007. Foreign Policy Analysis: A comparative introduction. Nueva York: Palgrave MacMillan. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230609242.

Burges, Sean. 2008. «Consensual Hegemony: Theorizing Brazilian Foreign Policy after the Cold War», International Relations, 22 (1): 65-84. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117807087243.

Burges, Sean. 2013. «Brazil as a bridge between old and new powers?», International Affairs 89 (3): 577-594. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.12034.

Carlsnaes, Walter. 2012. «Actors, structures and foreign policy analysis», en Steve Smith, Amelia Hadfield y Tim Dunne, Foreign policy: Theories, actors and cases. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Cheibub, Zairo Borges. 1989. «A carreira diplomática no Brasil: O processo de burocratização do Itamarati», Revista de Administração Pública, 23 (2): 97-128.

Drezner, Daniel. (2000). «Ideas, bureaucratic politics and the crafting of foreign policy», American Journal of Political Science 44 (4): 733-749. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.2307/2669278.

Fermandois, Joaquín. 1991. «De una inserción a otra: Política exterior de Chile 1966-1991», Estudios Internacionales 24 (96): 433-455.

Foyle, Douglas. 1997. «Public opinion and foreign policy: Elites beliefs as a mediating variable», International Studies Quarterly, 41(1): 141-169. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1111/0020-8833.00036.

Fuentes, Claudio. 2006. «La apuesta por el poder blando: política exterior de la Concertación 2000- 2006», en Robert Funk. El gobierno de Ricardo Lagos: la nueva vía chilena hacia el socialismo. Santiago de Chile: Ediciones Universidad Diego Portales.

Gomes Saraiva, Miriam. 2010a. A diplomacia brasileira e as visões sobre a inserção externa do Brasil: institucionalistas pragmáticos x autonomistas. Madrid: Real Instituto Elcano; ARI. Disponible en: https://bit.ly/2HqmdVi.

Gomes Saraiva, Miriam. 2010b. «Brazilian foreign policy towards South America during the Lula administration: caught between South America and Mercosur», Revista Brasileira e Política Internacional 53: 151-168. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-73292010000300009.

Gyngell, Alan y Michael Wesley. 2003. Making Australian Foreign Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511755873.

Halperin, Morton, Priscilla Clapp, y Arnold Kanter. 2006. Bureaucratic politics and foreign policy. Washington D.C.: The Brookings Institution.

Hollis, Martin y Steve Smith. 1986. «Roles and reasons in Foreign Policy Decision Making», British Journal of Political Science 16 (3): 269-286. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123400004415.

Hudson, Valerie. 2005. «Foreign Policy Analysis: Actor-Specific Theory and the Ground of International Relations», Foreign Policy Analysis 1 (1): 1-30. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-8594.2005.00001.x.

Hudson, Valerie. 2007. Foreign policy analysis: Classic and contemporary theory. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.

Kaarbo, Juliet. 1997. «Prime Minister Leadership Styles in Foreign Policy Decision-Making: A Framework for Research», Political Psychology 18 (3): 553-581. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895X.00068.

Kaarbo, Juliet. 1998. «Power Politics in Foreign Policy: The Influence of Bureaucratic Minorities», European Journal of International Relations 4 (1): 67-973. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066198004001003.

Kaarbo, Juliet. 2001. «The domestic politics of international negotiations: The effects of states structures and policymaking process», International Interactions 24 (1): 169-205. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1080/03050620108434981.

Kaarbo, Juliet y Baris Kesgin. 2010. «When and How Parliaments Influence Foreign Policy: The Case of Turkey’s Iraq Decision», International Studies Perspectives 11 (1): 19-36. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1528-3585.2009.00390.x.

Kaarbo, Juliet y Deborah Grunfeld. 1998. «The social psychology of inter intra-group conflict in governmental politics», Mershon International Studies Review 42 (1): 226-233. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.2307/254414.

Kaarbo, Juliet y Margaret Hermann. 1998. «Leadership styles of prime ministers: How individual differences affect the foreign policymaking process», The Leadership Quarterly 9 (3): 243-263. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(98)90029-7.

Keller, Jonathan y Dennis Foster. 2012. «Presidential Leadership Style and the Political Use of Force», Political Psychology 33 (5): 581-598. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2012.00903.x.

Knecht, Thomas y Stephen Weatheford. 2006. «Public opinion and foreign policy: The stages of presidential decision making», International Studies Quarterly 50 (3): 705-727. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2478.2006.00421.x.

Mack, W., Karl DeRouen Jr, y David Lanoue. 2013. «Foreign Policy Votes and Presidential Support in Congress», Foreign Policy Analysis 9 (1), 79-102. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-8594.2011.00166.x.

Malamud, Andrés. 2012. «Moving regions: Brazil’s global emergence and the redefinition of Latin American borders», en Pía Riggirozzi y Diana Tussie, The rise of post-hegemonic regionalism. The case of Latin America. Nueva York: Springer. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2694-9_9.

Marsh, Kevin. 2013. «Obama’s Surge: A bureaucratic politics analysis of the decision to order a troop surge in the Afghanistan War», Foreign Policy Analysis 10 (3): 265-288. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1111/fpa.12000.

Marshall, Bryan y Brandon Prins. 2011. «Power or posturing? Policy availability and congressional influence on U.S. Presidential decisions to use force», Presidential Studies Quarterly, 41 (3): 521-545. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1111/ j.1741-5705.2011.03885.x.

Mattli, Walter. 1999. The Logic of Regional Integration. Europe and Beyond. Nueva York: Cambridge University Press. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511756238.

Milet, Paz. 2003. «La política exterior de los gobiernos de la Concertación», Colombia Internacional 56 (57), 47-63.

Oelsner, Andres. 2005. International Relations in Latin America. Peace and Security in the Southern Cone. Nueva York: Routledge.

Pimenta de Faria, Carlos Aurélio, Dawisson Belém Lopez y Guilherme Casaroes. 2013. «Itamaraty on the move: Institutional and political change in Brazilian foreign service under Lula Da Silva’s presidency (2003-2010)», Bulletin of Latin American research 32 (4): 468-482. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1111/blar.12067.

Portales, Carlos. 2011. «Desafíos para la política exterior en las próximas décadas: Chile y la región en el mundo global», Estudios Internacionales 44 (169): 171-193.

Preston, Thomas y Paul ‘t Hart. 1999. «Understanding and evaluating bureaucratic politics: The nexus between political leaders and advisory systems», Political Psychology 20 (1): 49-98. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895X.00137.

Quezada, Abraham. 2010. «Inserción internacional de Chile en la post guerra fría: Concertación política e integración económica comercial; dos ejes conceptuales de la política exterior del gobierno de Ricardo Lagos (2000-2006)», Enfoques, 8 (13): 119-134.

Rosati, Jerel. 1981. «Developing a systematic decision-making framework. Bureaucratic politics in perspective», World Politics, 33 (2): 236-252. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.2307/2010371.

Sallum, Brasilio Jr. (2011). «Governo Collor: O Reformismo Liberal e a Nova Orientação da Política Externa Brasileira», DADOS: Revista de Ciências Sociais, 54 (2): 259-288. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0011-52582011000200002.

Soares de Lima, Maria Regina y Monica Hirst. 2006. «Brazil as intermediate state and regional power: action, choice and responsibilities», International Affairs, 82 (1): 21-40. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2346.2006.00513.x.

Sotomayor, Arturo. 2004. «Civil-Military affairs and security in the southern cone: The sources of Argentine-Brazilian Nuclear cooperation», Latin American Politics and Society, 46 (4): 29-60. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1353/lap.2004.0053.

Stolle Paixão y Casarões, Guilherme. 2012. «O papel do Itamaraty na definição da política externa do governo Collor de Mello», Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional, 55 (1): 135-153. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-73292012000100008.

Taliaferro, Jeffrey, Steven Lobell y Norrin Ripsman. 2009. «Introduction: Neoclassical realism, the state of the foreign policy», en Jeffrey Taliaferro, Steven Lobell y Norrin Ripsman (eds.), Neoclassical realism, the state and foreign policy. Nueva York: Cambridge University Press. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511811869.001.

Tickner, Arlene. 2012. «Rising Brazil and South America», en Steven Smith, Amelia Hadfield y Tim Dunne (eds.), Foreign policy. Theories, actor, cases. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Van Klaveren, Alberto. 2012. «La promoción de la democracia como principio de la política exterior de Chile», en Mario Artaza y César Ross, La política exterior de Chile, 1990-2009. Del aislamiento a la integración global. Santiago de Chile: RIL Editores.

Vargas, Edmundo. 2012. «La política exterior de Chile en derechos humanos», en Mario Artaza y César Ross (eds.), La política exterior de Chile, 1990-2009. Del aislamiento a la integración global. Santiago de Chile: RIL Editores.

Vigevani, Tullo y Gabriel Cepaluni. 2012. Brazilian foreign policy in changing times. The quest for autonomy from Sarney to Lula. Plymouth: Lexington Books.

Vigevani, Tullo, Marcelo De Oliveira y Rodrigo Cintra. 2003. «Política externa no período FHC: a busca de autonomia pela integração», Tempo Social 15 (2): 31-61. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-20702003000200003.

Welch, David. 1992. «The organizational process and bureaucratic politics», International Security, 17 (2): 112-146. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.2307/2539170.

Wilhelmy, Manfred y Roberto Durán. 2003. «Los principales rasgos de la política exterior chilena entre 1973 y 2000», Revista de Ciencia Política 23 (2): 273-286. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-090X2003000200014.

Wilhelmy, Manfred y Rosa Lazo. 1997. «La política multilateral de Chile en Asia-Pacífico», Estudios Internacionales, 30 (117): 3-35.

Published

2019-03-26

How to Cite

Valenzuela, P. (2019). Presidents versus foreign offices: The formulation of foreign policy in Brazil and Chile between 1990 and 2010. Revista Española De Ciencia Política, (49), 63–83. https://doi.org/10.21308/recp.49.03

Issue

Section

Articles