Online or face-to-face? The qualities of participatory initiatives in municipalities of Andalusia and Madrid
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21308/recp.66.02Keywords:
democratic innovations, citizen participation, design, inclusiveness, information, debate, onlineAbstract
This study analyses the implications of the adoption of online format in the design of democratic innovations, specifically in three key dimensions: the inclusiveness of participants, the provision of information and the interaction between participants. The main objective is to explore these qualities of face-to-face and online participatory initiatives in Spain and to try to explain their differences. Part of these differences may be due to the format (face-to-face versus online), but we will also analyse other possible explanatory factors of the design, such as the vocation for stability, the ideology of the local governments and the income of the municipalities. To do so, we follow a quantitative methodological design based on the analysis of data from an online survey addressed to all town councils of municipalities with more than 1000 inhabitants in Andalusia and Madrid. The database collected 608 participatory experiences that were being implemented in 2020 at the local level. The main findings suggest that online initiatives show a greater intention of inclusiveness of participants, with more open selection mechanisms, as well as providing information about the process in a more diversified way, through various channels. In contrast, the online format tends to be less conducive to horizontal interaction and debate among participants than face-to-face initiatives.
Downloads
References
Albrecht, Steffen. 2006. «Whose voice is heard in online deliberation? A study of participation and representation in political debates on the internet», Information, Community and Society, 9 (1): 62-82. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691180500519548
Allegretti, Giovanni. (2012). From scepticism to mutual support: Towards a structural change in the relations between participatory budgeting and the information and communication technologies? In P. Mindus, A. Greppi & M. Cuono (Eds.), Legitimacy 2.0. E-Democracy and Public Opinion in the Digital Age (pp. 145-182. Frankfurt am Main: Goethe University Press. https://hdl.handle.net/10316/42343
Annunziata, Rocío. 2022. «De la participación a la innovación: las instancias de deliberación online promovidas por la Ciudad de Buenos Aires», Administración Pública y Sociedad, 13: 176-200. https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/APyS/article/view/37771
Aragón, Pablo, Andreas Kaltenbrunner, Antonio Calleja-López, Andrés Pereira, Arnau Monterde, Xabier E. Barandiaran y Vicenç Gómez. 2017. «Deliberative Platform Design: The Case Study of the Online Discussions in Decidim Barcelona», en Giovanni L.
Baek, Young M., Magdalena Wojcieszak y Michael X. Delli Carpini. 2012. «Online versus face-to-face deliberation: Who? Why? What? With what effects?», New Media & Society, 14 (3): 363-383. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444811413191
Baiocchi, Gianpaolo y Ernesto Ganuza. 2014. «Participatory Budgeting as if Emancipation Mattered», Politics & Society, 42 (1): 29-50. https://doi:org/10.1177/0032329213512978
Baiocchi, Gianpaolo y Ernesto Ganuza. 2017. Popular Democracy: The Paradox of Participation. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Baiocchi, Gianpaolo. 2005. Militants and Citizens: The Politics of Participatory Democracy in Porto Alegre. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Balduzzi, Teresa y Livia Siclari. 2024. «Participative and Deliberative Democracy Facing Technology: A Study on Digital Democratic Innovations», Rivista Italiana Di Informatica e Diritto, 1: 87-118. https://doi.org/10.32091/RIID0140
Barber, Benjamin R. 1984. Strong Democracy Participatory Politics for a New Age. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Becerril-Viera, Isabel, Ernesto Ganuza y Carlos Rico-Motos. 2024. «Birds of a feather flock together: Influence of ideology in the implementation of participation», Democratization, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2024.2340638
Bherer, Laurence, José Luis Fernández-Martínez, Patricia García-Espín y Manuel Jiménez-Sánchez. 2018. «The promise for democratic deepening: The effects of participatory processes in the interaction between civil society and local governments», Journal of Civil Society, 12 (3): 344-363. https://doi.org/10.1080/17448689.2016.1215957
Borge, Rosa, Clelia Colombo y Yanina Welp. 2009. «Online and offline participation at the local level: a quantitative analysis of the Catalan municipalities», Information, Communication & Society, 12 (6): 899-928. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691 180802483054
Borge, Rosa, Joan Balcells, Albert Padró-Solanet, Albert Batlle, Andreu Orte y Ricardo Serra. 2018. «La participación política a través de la plataforma Decidim: análisis de 11 municipios catalanes», en Gobierno, Administración y Políticas Públicas. Actas del IX Congreso Internacional en Gobierno, Administración y Políticas Públicas GIGAPP. Madrid: GIGAPP.
Chambers, Simone. 2003. «Deliberative Democratic Theory», Annual Review of Political Science, 6 (1): 307-326. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.6.121901.085538
Cohen, Joshua y Archon Fung. 2004. «Radical democracy», Swiss Journal of Political Science, 10 (4): 23-34. https://doi.org/10.3917/rai.042.0115
Cohen, Joshua y Archon Fung. 2023. «Democratic responsibility in the digital public sphere», Constellations, 30: 92-97. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8675.12670
Colombo, Clelia. 2006. «Participación ciudadana electrónica en el mundo local: El caso de Consensus, ciudadanos en red». Actas del III Congreso Online del Observatorio de la CiberSociedad.
Cunha, Eleonora S.M., Giovanni Allegretti y Marisa Matias. 2011. «Participatory Budgeting and the Use of Information and Communication Technologies: A Virtuous Cycle?», RCCS Annual Review, 3. https://doi.org/10.4000/rccsar.316
Dajer, Diana. 2023. «Designing for inclusion and designing for exclusion: The influence of digital tools on political inclusion in Medellín’s participatory budgeting process», Local Development & Society. https:/doi.org/10.1080/26883597.2023.219236
Davies, Todd y Reid Chandler. 2011. «Online Deliberation Design: Choices, Criteria and Evidence», en Tina Nabatchi, John Gastil, G. Michael Weiksner y Matt Leihningerr, (ed.), Democracry in Motion: Evaluating the Practice and Impact of Deliberative Civic Engagement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Del Pino, Eloisa. 2003. En Colino, del Pino, Ramio y Salvador, (ed.), Gobiernos Locales e Impulso Democrático: las nuevas formas de participación ciudadana en los gobiernos locales europeos. Barcelona: Fundación Alternativas y Diputación de Barcelona.
Does, Ramon y David Bos. 2021. «What can make online government platforms inclusive and deliberative? A reflection on online participatory budgeting in Duinoord, The Hague», Journal of Deliberative Democracy, 17 (1): 48-55. https://doi.org/10.16997/jdd.965
Elstub, Stephen y Oliver Escobar. 2019. «Defining and typologising democratic innovations», en Stephen Elstub y Oliver Escobar, (ed.), Handbook of Democratic Innovation and Governance. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781786433862.00009
Elstub, Stephen, Jayne Carrick, David M. Farrell y Patricia Mockler. 2021a. «The scope of climate assemblies: lessons from the climate assembly UK», Sustainability, 13 (20): 11272. 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132011272
Elstub, Stephen, Rachel Thompson, Oliver Escobar, Joe Hollinghurst, Duncan Grimes, Mhairi Aitken, Anna McKeon, Kerina H. Jones, Alexa Waud y Nayha Sethi. 2021b. «The Resilience of Pandemic Digital Deliberation: An Analysis of Online Synchronous Forums», Journal of the European Institute for Communication and Culture, 28 (3): 237-255. https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2021.1969616
Font, Joan y Carol Galais. 2009. Experiències de democràcia participativa local a Catalunya: un mapa analític. Catalunya: Collecció Participació Ciutadana.
Font, Joan, Donatella Della Porta y Yves Sintomer. 2014. Participatory Democracy in Southern Europe. Causes, Characteristics and Consequences. New York: Rowman & Littlefield International.
Francés, Francisco, Marta Barros, Andrés Falck, Rocío Pérez-Gañán, Sahsil Enríquez, Javier Ortega y Alicia Martínez. 2024. «Repensando la participación comunitaria: Continuidades y transformaciones del Presupuesto Participativo en España», Oñati Socio-Legal Series, 14 (4): 932-954. https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl.1878
Friess, Dennis y Christiane Eilders. 2015. «A Systematic Review of Online Deliberation Research», Policy and Internet, 7 (3): 319-339. https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.95
Fuentes, Claudio y Julián Goñi. 2021. «Online Critical Debate Model: Deliberation for the Digital Age», en Adelino Cattani y Bruno Mastroianni (ed.), Competing, cooperating, deciding: towards a model of deliberative debate. Florencia: Firenze University Press. https://doi.org/10.36253/978-88-5518-329-1
Fung, Archon. 2003. «Recipes for Public Spheres: Eight Institutional Design Choices and Their Consequences», Journal of Political Philosophy, 11 (3): 338-367. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9760.00181
Fung, Archon. 2006. «Varieties of Participation in Complex Governance», Public Administration Review, 66: 66-75. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4096571
Goodin, Robert E. y Simon J. Niemeyer. 2003. «When Does Deliberation Begin? Internal Reflection versus Public Discussion in Deliberative Democracy», Political Studies, 51: 627-649. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0032-3217.2003.00450.x
Graham, Todd y Tamara Witschge. 2003. «In search of online deliberation: Towards a new method for examining the quality of online discussions», Communications, 28 (2): 173-204. https://doi.org/10.1515/comm.2003.012
Griffin, Jamie, Abdel M. Tarik, Alan Tomkins, Amanda Richardson y Stacia Jorgensen. 2015. «Understanding Participant Representativeness in Deliberative Events: A Case Study Comparing Probability and Non-Probability Recruitment Strategies», Journal of Public Deliberation, 11 (1). https://doi.org/10.16997/jdd.221
Gudowsky, Niklas y Ulrike Bechtold. 2013. «The role of information in public participation», Journal of Public Deliberation, 9 (1): 1-35. https://doi.org/10.16997/jdd.152
Gunther, Richard P. y José Ramón Montero. 2006. «The Multidimensionality of Political Support for New Democracies: Conceptual Redefinition and Empirical Refinement», en Mariano Torcal y José Ramón Montero, (ed.), Political Disaffection in Contemporary Democracies. Londres: Routledge.
Hartz-Karp, Janette y Brian Sullivan. 2014. «The Unfulfilled Promise of Online Deliberation», Journal of Public Deliberation, 10 (1). https://doi.org/10.16997/jdd.191
Held, David. 1987. Models of Democracy. Standford: Stanford University Press.
Hendricks, Frank y Ank Michels. 2024. «Exploring the Democratic Merits of Hybrid Democratic Innovation. Combining Deliberation and Voting in Participatory Budgeting New Style», International Journal of Public Administration. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2024.2390492
Himelboim, Itai, Eric Gleave y Marc A. Smith. 2009. «Discussion catalysts in online political discussions: content importers and conversation starters», Journal of Computer-mediated communication, 14 (4): 771-789. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01470.x
Janssen, Davy y Raphaël Kies. 2005. «Online Forums and Deliberative Democracy», Acta Politica, 40: 317-335. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ap.5500115
Kennedy, Ryan, Anand E. Sokhey, Claire Abernathy, Kevin M. Esterling, David M. J. Lazer, Amy Lee, William Minozzi y Michael A. Neblo. 2021. «Demographics and (Equal?) Voice: Assessing Participation in Online Deliberative Sessions», Political Studies, 69 (1): 66-88. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321719890805
Kersting, Norbert. 2016. «Participatory turn? Comparting citizens’ and politicians’ perspectives on online and offline local political participation», Lex Localis, 14 (2): 251-263. https://doi.org/10.4335/14.2.249-263(2016)
Liao, Yuguo y Hindy L. Schachter. 2018. «Exploring the antecedents of municipal managers’ attitudes towards citizen participation», Public Management Review, 20 (9): 1287-1308. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2017.1363903
Lim, Seunghoo y Youngmin Oh. 2016. «Online Versus Offline Participation: Has the Democratic Potential of the Internet Been Realized? Analysis of a Participatory Budgeting System in Korea», Public Performance & Management Review, 39 (3): 676-700. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2016.1146553
Lindholm, Jenny y Janne Berg. 2022. «Why do innovations fail? Lessons learned from a digital democratic innovation», EJournal of EDemocracy and Open Government, 14 (2): 130-148. https://doi.org/10.29379/jedem.v14i2.728
Lipietz, Bárbara y Yves Cabannes. 2020. «Revisitando las promesas democráticas del presupuesto participativo, a la luz de lógicas antagónicas de radicalización política, de buena gobernanza y tecnocrática», Revista Argentina de Democracia Participativa, 1 (2). https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10112919
Migchelbrink, Koen y Steven Van de Walle. 2022. «Serving Multiple Masters? Public Managers’ Role Perceptions in Participatory Budgeting», Administration & Society, 54 (3): 339-365. https://doi.org/10.1177/00953997211014476
Muhlberger, Peter. 2006. «Lessons from the Virtual Agora Project: The Effects of Agency, Identity, Information, and Deliberation on Political Knowledge», Journal of Public Deliberation, 2 (1). https://doi.org/10.16997/jdd.37
Mutti, Antonio. (1992). Il boun vicino. Rapporti di cicinato nella metrópoli. Bolonia: Il Mulino.
Newton, Kenneth y Brigitte Geissel. 2012. Evaluating Democratic Innovations: Curing the Democratic Malaise? Londres: Routledge.
Pateman, Carole. 1970. Participation and Democratic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Roberts, Jennifer J., Ruth Lightbody, Ragne Low y Stephen Elstub. 2020. «Experts and evidence in deliberation: scrutinising the role of witnesses and evidence in mini‑publics, a case study», Policy Sci, 53: 3-32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-019-09367-x
Robles, José M., Mirko Antino, Stefano De Marco y Josep A. Lobera. 2016. «The new frontier of digital inequality. The participatory divide», Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas, 156: 97-116. https://doi.org/10.5477/cis/reis.156.97
Sesma, Dolores, Pau Alarcón y Joan Font. 2011. «¿Por qué los ayuntamientos ponen en marcha políticas de participación? Experiencias recientes en Andalucía y la comunidad de Madrid»Actas del X Congreso de AECPA. Murcia: Universidad de Murcia.
Sintomer, Yves y Ernesto Ganuza. 2011. «Investigación sobre las experiencias de presupuesto participativo en Europa», en Yves Sintomer, Carsten Herzberg y Anja Röcke, (ed.), Democracia participativa y modernización de los servicios públicos. París: Transnational Institute.
Skelcher, Chris y Jacob Torfing. 2010. «Improving democratic governance through institutional design: Civic participation and democratic ownership in Europe», Regulation & Governance, 4 (1): 71-91. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-5991.2010.01072.x
Smith, Graham. 2009. Democratic Innovations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stortone, Stefano y Fiorella De Cindio. 2015. «Hybrid Participatory Budgeting: Local Democratic Practices in the Digital Era», en Marcus Foth, Martin Brynskov y Timo Ojala, (eds.), Citizen’s Right to the Digital City. Singapore: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-919-6_10
Subirats, Joan. 2002. Redes, territorios y gobierno: nuevas respuestas locales a los retos de la globalización. Barcelona: Diputación de Barcelona.
Towne, W. Ben y James D. Herbsleb. 2012. «Design Considerations for Online Deliberation Systems», Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 9 (1): 97-115. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2011.637711
Vissers, Sara y Dietlind Stolle. 2014. «The Internet and new modes of political participation: online versus offline participation», Information, Communication & Society, 17 (8): 937-955. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2013.867356
Walliser, Andrés. (2002). Participación y Ciudad. Centro de Estudios Avanzados en Ciencias Sociales, Madrid.
Warne, Harry, Lina Dencik y Arne Hintz. 2021. «Advancing civic participation in algorithmic decision-making: A guidebook for the public sector». https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/143384
Young, Iris. 2002. Inclusion and democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zolotov, Mijail N., Tiago Oliveira y Sven Casteleyn. 2018. «Continued intention to use online participatory budgeting: The effect of empowerment and habit» en Proceedings of the 11thInternational Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance. Galway, Ireland. https://doi.org/10.1145/3209415.3209461
Downloads
- pdf (Español (España))
- html (Español (España))
- xml (Español (España))
- Gráfico 1 (Español (España))
- Gráfico 2 (Español (España))
- Gráfico 3 (Español (España))
- Gráfico 4 (Español (España))
- Gráfico 5 (Español (España))
- Tabla 1 (Español (España))
- Tabla 2 (Español (España))
- Tabla 3 (Español (España))
- Tabla 4 (Español (España))
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Isabel Becerril-Viera
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.