Sustainability and Human Flourishing: Towards a Normative Theory of Ecomodernism Through the Capabilities Approach

Authors

  • Daniel Lara de la Fuente Universidad de Málaga

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21308/recp.63.07

Keywords:

ecomodernism, capabilities, human flourishing, capability thresholds and ceilings, limitarianism, sufficientarism

Abstract

Ecomodernists argue that decoupling human well-being of its ecological impacts through a wise use of science and technology is required to reach justice and sustainability in the Anthropocene. This article defends the pertinence of the Capabilities Approach to support normatively this notion by the following way. Firstly, I argue that ecomodernism shares with the Capabilities Approach a specific meaning of human flourishing derived from freedom of choice. Secondly, I present an ecomodernist conception of the Sustainable Ecological Capacity, as well as its links with the capability ceilings to establish the foundations of my proposal. Finally, I conclude that such an exploration brings to a new «weak» ecomodernism, based on a simultaneous application of sufficientarian and limitarian accounts on distributive justice of ecosystem goods and services.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agencia Internacional de la Energía (2023). Energy Efficiency. The Decade for Action. Disponible en: https://www.iea.org/reports/energy-efficiency-the-decade-for-action.

Alexander, J. M. (2008). Capabilities and Social Justice. Oxon, New York: Routledge. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315260914.

Ausubel, J. (1996). The Liberation of the Environment. Daedalus, 125(3), 1-17. Disponible en : https://www.jstor.org/stable/20027368.

Asafu-Adjaye, J. et al. (2015) An Ecomodernist Manifesto. Disponible en: http://www.ecomodernism.org/

Axelsen, David V. y Lasse Nielsen (2015). «Sufficiency as Freedom from Duress». The Journal of Political Philosophy, 23(4), 406-426. DOI: 10.1111/jopp.12048.

Bowen, A., Fankhauser, S. (2011). «The green growth narrative: Paradigm shift or just spin?».Global Environmental Change, 21(4), 1157-1159. DOI:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.07.

Brand, Stewart (2010). Whole Earth Discipline. New York: Penguin Books.

Carpintero Óscar y Fernando A. Frechoso (2023). «Energía, sostenibilidad y transición: nuevos desafíos y problemas pendientes». Arbor, 199(807). DOI: 10.3989/arbor.2023.807001.

Clark, Michael A. et. al (2020). «Global food system emissions could preclude achieving the 1.5° and 2°C climate change targets». Science, 370, 705-708. DOI: 10.1126/science.aba7357

Crutzen, Paul J. (2002). «The Anthropocene». Journal de Physique IV, 12(10), 1-5. DOI: 10.1051 /jp4:20020447.

Crutzen, Paul y Eugene Stoermer (2000) «The Anthropocene’». Global Change Newsletter, 41, 17-18.

Defries, Ruth. et.al (2012). «Planetary Opportunities: A Social Contract for Global Change Science to Contribute to a Sustainable Future». Bioscience, 62(6), 603-606. DOI: 10.1525/bio.2012.62.6.11.

Enríquez Sánchez, José María, Carmen Duce y Luis Javier Miguel (2020). Repensar la sostenibilidad. Editorial UNED.

Gabrielson, Teena, et. al (2015). The Oxford Handbook of Environmental Political Theory. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199685271.001.0001.

Hausfather, Zeke (2021). «Absolute Decoupling of Economic Growth and Emissions in 32 Countries.» The BreakThrough Institute. Disponible en: https://thebreakthrough.org/issues/energy/absolute-decoupling-of-economic-growth-and-emissions-in-32-countries.

Holland, Breena (2008a). «Justice and the Environment in Nussbaum’s ‘Capabilities Approach’: Why Sustainable Ecological Capacity is a Meta-Capability». Political Research Quarterly, 61(2), 319-332. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1065912907306471.

Holland, Breena (2008b). «Ecology and the Limits of Justice: Establishing ‘Capability Ceilings’ in Nussbaum’s Capabilities Approach.» Journal of Human Development and Capabilities {Special Issue on Ideas Changing History), 9 (3), 399-423. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14649880802236631.

Holland, Breena (2014). Allocating the Earth: A Distributional Framework for Protecting Capabilities in Environmental Law and Policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199692071.001.0001.

Holland, Breena (2022). Capabilities, Future Generations, and Climate Justice. En Steven Gardiner (ed.), Oxford Handbook of Intergenerational Ethics. Oxford University Press (en línea). DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190881931.013.13.

Kallis, Giorgos (2021). «Limits, ecomodernism and degrowth». Political Geography, 87, 102367. DOI:10.1016/j.polgeo.2021.102367

Karlsson, Rasmus (2018). «The high-energy planet». Global Change, Peace & Security, 30(1), 77-84. DOI: 10.1080/14781158.2018.1428946.

Keefer, Chistopher (presentador) (2021, 21 de octubre). «Ted Nordhaus Deconstructs Degrowth» [episodio de pódcast de audio]. En Decouple Media. Anchor. Disponible en: https://anchor.fm/chris15401/episodes/Ted-Nordhaus-Deconstructs-Degrowth-e194enp.

Lewis, Martin. W. (1993). «On Human Connectedness with Nature». New Literary History, 24(4), 797-809. https://doi.org/10.2307/469393.

Lewis, Martin. W. (1995). Green Delusions: An Environmentalist Critique of Radical Environmentalism. Durham and London: Duke University Press (2ª impresión).

Maslow, Abraham (1943). «A theory of human motivation». Psychological Review, 50(4), 370-396. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0054346

Moyano, Cristian. (2021). Los límites de la igualdad de capacidades. De la ganadería intensiva a la renaturalización. Puyol, Ángel y Filka Sekulova (dir.). Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona: Barcelona Disponible en:https://www.tdx.cat/bitstream/handle/10803/672591/cmf1de1.pdf?sequence=1

Naciones Unidas (2015). Paris Agreement. Disponible en: https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/english_paris_agreement.pdf.

Nordhaus, Ted y Michael Shellenberger (2004). «The Death of Environmentalism». Global Warming Politics in a Post-Environmental World. Disponible en : https://s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/uploads.thebreakthrough.org/legacy/images/Death_of_Environmentalism.pdf

Nordhaus Ted y Michael Shellenberger (2009). Break Through. Why We Can’t Leave Saving the Planet to Environmentalists. Boston: Mariner Books.

Nussbaum, Marta C. (1988). «Nature, Function, and Capability: Aristotle on Political Distribution». En Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy: Supplementary Volume (pp.145-184). Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.

Nussbaum, Martha. C. (2000). Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach. New York: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511841286.

Nussbaum, Martha C. (2006). Frontiers of Justice: Disability, Nationality, Species Membership. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. http://dx.doi.org/

2307/j.ctv1c7zftw.

Nussbaum, Martha C. (2011). Creating Capabilites. The Human Development Approach. Cambridge, MA; London: Belknap Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674061200.

Robeyns, Ingrid (2017). «Having too Much». Nomos, Wealth, 58, 1-44. Disponible en: https://www.jstor.org/stable/26785948.

Robeyns, Ingrid (2022). «Why Limitarianism?» The Journal of Political Philosophy, 30(2), 249-270. DOI: 10.1111/jopp.12275.

Ritchie, Hannah (2021). «Many countries have decoupled economic growth from CO2 emissions, even if we take offshored production into account». Our World in Data. Disponible en: https://ourworldindata.org/co2-gdp-decoupling.

Rockström, Johan, et. al (2009). «Planetary Boundaries: Exploring the Safe Operating Space for Humanity». Ecology and Society, 14(2), 32-64. DOI:10.5751/ES-03180-140232.

Schuppert, (2014). «Distinguishing basic needs and fundamental interests». Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 16:1, 24-44, DOI: 10.1080/13698230.2011.583532.

Sen, Amartya (1980). «Equality of What?». En McMurrin, S. (ed.). Tanner Lectures on Human Values, vol.1 (pp.197-220). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Sen, Amartya (1988). «Freedom of choice: Concept and content». European Economic Review, 32, (2-3), 269-294. https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-2921(88)90173-0.

Sen, Amartya (1993). «Capability and Well-being». En Nussbaum and Sen (eds.). The Quality of Life (pp.30-53). New York: Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/0198287976.003.0003.

Sen, Amartya (1999). Development as Freedom. New York: Knopf.

Smil, Vaclav (2010). «Energy, Ethics and Civilization». En Yiao, Raymond, et. al (eds). Visions of Discovery: New Light on Physics, Cosmology, and Consciousness (pp.709-729). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Smil, Vaclav (2013). Should we eat meat ? Evolution and consequences of modern carnivory. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781118278710.

Steffen,Will, et al. (2015). «Planetary Boundaries: Guiding Human Development on a Changing Planet». Science, 347, (6223), 736. DOI: 10.1126/science.1259855

Symons, Jonathan. (2019). Ecomodernism: Technology, Politics, and the Climate Crisis. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

Symons, Jonathan y Rasmus Karlsson (2018). «Ecomodernist citizenship: rethinking political obligations in a climate-changed world». Citizenship Studies, 22(7). DOI:10.1080/13621025.2018.1508414.

Published

2023-11-30

How to Cite

Lara de la Fuente, D. (2023). Sustainability and Human Flourishing: Towards a Normative Theory of Ecomodernism Through the Capabilities Approach. Revista Española De Ciencia Política, (63), 167–187. https://doi.org/10.21308/recp.63.07

Issue

Section

Articles