LEARNING TECHNOLOGY AND PATTERNS OF TEACHING

  • Thomas Illum Hansen

Resumen

There is a statistical correlation between types of teaching methods and types of digital learning materials used in Danish state schools. Especially when it comes to “presentational learning materials”, a category which subsume digital textbooks and larger systems and portals characterized by a looser coupling between subjects and courses than the linear progression that characterises the chapter structure of a textbook. This is a finding in a major new study
undertaken in 2012-2014 by Rambøll Management Consulting and Boston Consulting Group, within an empirical and theoretical framework developed by Jeppe Bundsgaard and the author.
This is partly due to a review of international research in the impact of digital learning materials, and partly due to a theoretical framework with typologies of teaching patterns and digital learning material. This article will present the central parts of the theoretical framework, selected results, and ends with a critique of methods used in the collecting of empirical data with a view to future research in the connection between digital learning materials and teaching patterns.

Citas

Brünken, R., & Leutner, D. (2001). Aufmerksamkeitsverteilung oder Aufmerksamkeitsfokussierung? Empirische Ergebnisse zur “Split-Attention-Hypothese” beim Lernen mit Multimedia. Unterrichtswissenschaft, 29, 357–366.

Bundsgaard, J., & Hansen, T. I. (2013). Kvaliteter ved digitale læremidler og ved pædagogiske praksisser med digitale læremidler. Retrieved from http://uvm.dk/Uddannelser/Folkeskolen/Ifokus/Oegetanvendelseafitfolkeskolen/~/media/U VM/Filer/Udd/Folke/PDF13/130927%20Forskningsrapport%20effektmaaling.ashx

Edling, A. (2006). Abstraction and authority in textbooks. The textual paths towards specialized language, Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis, Uppsala universitet.

Hansen, T.I., & Skovmand, K (2011): Fælles mål og midler. Klim.

Hansen, T.I. (2011). Poetik og lingvistik. Dansklærerforeningen.

Hansen, T.I. (2013). Evaluering af digitale læremidler. Læremiddeldidaktik VI.

Hattie, J. (2009). Visible Learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement, Routledge.

Henderson, L. (2008): Praksisfællesskaber i undervisningen. Elevers deltagelsesformer i undervisning baseret på PracSIP’en: Redaktionen. Speciale.

Kay, R (2006-2007): A systematic evaluation of learning objects for secondary school students” j. educational technology systems, 35(4), 411-448.

Koschmann, T. (1996a). Paradigm shifts and instructional technology, Koschmann, T. (Ed.), CSCL: Theory and practice of an emerging paradigm (1–23). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh. New York: Basic Books.

Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things : What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Lowe, R., & Schnotz, W (red.) (2008). Learning with Animation: Research Implications for Design. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Mayer, R.E. (2009). Multimedia Learning: Second Edition. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Meyer, H. (2006). Hvad er god undervisning? København: Gyldendal.

Nielsen Norman Group Report (2010). Usability of Websites for Children. Retrieved from www.nngroup.com/reports/kids.

O’Neil, H.F., & Perez, R.S. (red.) (2003). Technology, Applications in Education: A Learning View. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

O’Neil, H.F., & Perez, R.S. (red.) (2006). Web-Based Learning. Theory, Research, and Practice. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas. Basic Books.

Pawson, R., & Tilley, N. (1997): Realistic Evaluation. SAGE Publications ltd.

Pea, R. (2004). The Social and Technological Dimensions of Scaffolding and Related Theoretical Concepts for Learning, Education, and Human Activity. The journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(3), 423-451.

PyllikZillig, L.M., Bodvarsson, M., & Bruning, R. (red.) (2005). Technology-Based Education. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.

Reiser, R.A., & Dempsy, J.V. (red.) (2007). Trends and Issues in Instructional Design and Technology. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Merill Prentice Hall.

Rosch, E. (1978). Cognition and categorization. Hillsdale, N.J.; New York: L. Erlbaum Associates; distributed by Halsted Press.

Rouet, J-F., Levonen, J.J., & Biardeau, A. (red.) (2001). Multimedia Learning: Cognitive and Instructional Issues. Oxford, UK: Pergamon.

Rushkoff, D. (2010). Program or Be Programmed: Ten Commands for a Digital Age. New York, OR Books.

Sawyer, K. (2005). Introduction. In Sawyer, K. (red.), The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences (1-16). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Shaffer, D. W. (2006). Epistemic frames for epistemic games. Computers & Education, 46(3), 223–234.

Shear, L., Gallagher, L., & Patel, D. (2011). Innovative Teaching and Learning 2011 Findings and Implications. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International. Hentet fra. Retrieved from

http://itlresearch.com/images/stories/reports/ITL%20Research%202011%20Findings%20and%20Implications%20-%20Final.pdf

Sinclair, J. & Coulthard, M. (1975). Towards an analy-sis of discourse: The English used by teachers and pupils. London: Oxford University Press.

Spector, J.M., Merill, M.D., Merrienbour, J.Van & Driscoll, M.P. (red.) (2008). Handbook of Research on Educational Coomunications and Technology (3rd Edition). New York: Erlbaum.

Tulodziecki, G. (2010). Standards für die Medienbildung als eine Grundlage für die empirische Erfassung von Medienkompetenz- Niveaus. In Herzig, Bardo, u. a. (Hrsg.), Jahrbuch Medienpädagogik 8, (81-101). Wiesbaden.

Wegerif, R. (2004). The role of educational software as a support for teaching and learning conversations, Computers & Education, 43(1-2).

Publicado
2016-04-01