Freedom of choice, competition and quality: educational policies of the Autonomous Region of Madrid

Autores/as

  • Miriam Prieto Egido Universidad Complutense de Madrid
  • Patricia Villamor Manero Universidad Complutense de Madrid

Palabras clave:

Quasi-markets, educational policy, school choice, educational quality, competition

Resumen

The current article constitutes a part of the broader research project “Endogenous and exogenous
dynamics of privatization in education: the establishment of the quasi-market model in Spain”,
funded by the Spanish Ministry of Education. One of the main line of research is being developed in
the Autonomous region of Madrid, and its main aim is to track and state explicitly endogenous and
exogenous privatization dynamics within the local educational system, in order to detect and
analyze their educational effects and consequences. The local educational government has as main
goal the promotion of families’ right to choose the school for their children. The promotion of this
right will have as consequence, as the local government argues, the promotion of the competition
between schools, which in turn will improve the quality of education. In order to achieve this aim,
the local government is carrying out two main approaches: promoting the autonomy of schools and
publicizing rankings of schools. This article is based on the analysis of the effectiveness of these
policies in relation with the quality of education from three perspectives: the implementation of
these policies by the regional government, which constitutes an analysis of internal consistency;
the real effectiveness of these policies, that is to say, their influence on the quality of the
educational system as a whole, and finally, the reception of these policies from the families and
from the schools, as they both constitute the supply and demand of education.

Citas

Ball, S., Youdell, D. (2007). Privatización encubierta de la educación. Informe Preliminar de V Congreso

Mundial de la Educación.

Bernasconi, A. (2000). School Choice in Chile. Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs, 42

(3), 196-200.

Calero, J. y Bonal, X. (1999). Política educativa y gasto público en educación. Barcelona: Ediciones

Pomares-Corredor.

Carnoy, M. (1998). National Voucher Plans in Chile and Sweden: Did Privatization Reforms make for

better education? Comparative Education Review, 42 (3), 309-337.

Duru-Bellat, M. (2004): Debates y prácticas en materia de elección de centros escolares en los países

europeos y los Estados Unidos. Revista de Educación, 333, 41-58.

Fiske, E., and Ladd, H. (2000). When schools compete: A cautionary tale. Washington, DC: The

Brookings Institution.

Gaurin, V. (1999). School choice in Chile: Two decades of educational reform. Washington DC: Brookings

Institution Press.

Gintis, H. y otros. (2002). School choice. Un debate con Herbert Gintis. En M. Narodowski, M. Nores y M.

Andrada (eds.). Nuevas tendencias en políticas educativas. Estado, escuela y mercado, (pp. 29-

. Argentina: Granica.

Glenn, Ch. L. (1991). Why are so afraid of school choice? (And we can learn from Massachusetts). The

Public Interest, 102, 2-49.

Glenn, Ch. L. y De Groof, J. (2005). Finding the Right Balance: Freedom and Accountability in

Education. Netherlands: WLP.

Gorard, S., Taylor, C. and Fitz, J. (2002). Does school choice lead to 'spirals of decline'? Journal of

Education Policy, 17 (3), 367-384.

Hepburn, C.R. (1999). The Case for School Choice. Models from the United States, New Zealand,

Denmark, and Sweden. Disponible en http://www.fraserinstitute.ca

Howe, Eisenhart, and Betebenner (2001), Howe, K., Eisenhart, M. and Betebenner, D. (2001). School

choice crucible: A case study of Boulder Valley. Phi Delta Kappan, 83, 137-146.

Lee, V.E.; Croninger, R.G. y Smith, J.B. (1994). Parental choice of schools and social stratification in

education: The paradox of Detroit. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 16 (4), 434-457.

Levacic, R. and Woods, P. (2002). ‘Raising School Performance in the League Tables (Part 1):

Disentangling the effects of social disadvantage’, British Educational Research Journal, 28 (2),

-226.

Maroy, C. (2008) ¿Por qué y cómo regular el mercado educativo? Profesorado. Revista de Currículum y

Formación de Profesorado, 12(2). Disponible en:

http://www.ugr.es/local/recfpro/rev122ART1.pdf

Prieto, M.; Villamor, P. (2012) Dinámicas de privatización endógena y exógena en la Comunidad de

Madrid. Indicadores y criterios. En González, H.; Segovia, A.; Reyes de la Rosa, J. (Eds.) ¿A

dónde va la escuela en Europa?, pp. 147-157. Córdoba: Departamento de Educación,

Universidad de Córdoba.

Robson, W. y Hepburn, C.R. (2002). Learning from Success: What Americans Can Learn from School

Choice in Canada. Milton y Rose D. Friedman Foundation and The Fraser Institute. Disponible en

http://www.friedmanfoundation.org

Torres, J. (2001). Educación en tiempos de neoliberalismo. Madrid: Morata.

Van Zanten, A. (2008). Reflexividad y elección de la escuela por los padres de la clase media en Francia.

En M.I. Jociles y A. Franzé (Eds.), ¿Es la escuela el problema? Perspectivas socio-antropológicas

de etnografía y educación, (pp. 307-331). Madrid: Trotta.

Villamor Manero, P. (2005). La libertad de elección en educación: análisis pedagógico de la situación

nacional e internacional. Madrid: Universidad Complutense.

Villaroya, A. (2000). La Financiación de los Centros Concertados. Madrid: Ministerio de Educación,

Cultura y Deporte.

Whitty, G., & Power, S. (2000). Marketization and privatization in mass education systems. International

Journal of Educational Development, 20 (2), 93-107.

Publicado

2012-09-01