EU fundamental rights adjudication through the infringement procedure and constitutional scrutiny of the actions of the Member states
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18042/cepc/rdce.61.04Keywords:
Charter of Fundamental Rights, infringement procedure, fundamental rights adjudication, European Commission, Court of Justice of the European Union.Abstract
The Charter of Fundamental Rights is a parameter to measure the constitutionality of EU secondary law, of EU institutional action and, within the margins of article 51, of Member states’ actions when they implement EU law. The preliminary reference procedure has already produced a sufficient amount of rulings in which EU fundamental rights apply to Member states. In this period in which some EU countries are defying democratic principles and removing constitutional guarantees, there is a renovated concern in EU fundamental rights adjudication through law. Political, institutional and academic debate is focused in such mechanisms, among which the classic Treaty infringement procedure has concealed especial interest. Infringement procedure is an available tool to enforce EU fundamental rights in Member states, with its double nature as a political and a legal instrument. The present study analyses the infringement procedure as federal enforcement, how it could be activated as a guarantee for EU fundamental rights in the Member states and its adequacy in situations out of EU law scope of application.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Additional Files
Published
2018-11-29
How to Cite
Serrano, M. R.-I. (2018). EU fundamental rights adjudication through the infringement procedure and constitutional scrutiny of the actions of the Member states. Revista De Derecho Comunitario Europeo, (61), 933–971. https://doi.org/10.18042/cepc/rdce.61.04
Issue
Section
STUDIES
License
Copyright
Submission of a manuscript to the RDCE implies having read and accepted the journal's editorial guidelines and instructions for authors. When a work is accepted for publication, it is understood that the author grants the RDCE exclusive rights of reproduction, distribution and, where appropriate, sale of his manuscript for exploitation in all countries of the world in printed version, as well as any other magnetic, optical and digital media.
Authors shall transfer the publishing rights of their manuscript to RDCE so that it may be disseminated and capitalised on Intranets, the Internet and any web portals and wireless devices that the publisher may decide, by placing it at the disposal of users so that the latter may consult it online and extract content from it, print it and/or download and save it. These activities must comply with the terms and conditions outlined on the website hosting the work. However, the RDCE authorises authors of papers published in the journal to include a copy of these papers, once published, on their personal websites and/or other open access digital repositories. Copies must include a specific mention of RDCE, citing the year and issue of the journal in which the article was published, and adding a link to the RDCE website(s).
A year after its publication, the works of the RDCE will be under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-NoDerivative 4.0 International license (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and its first publication is indicated, without the right to commercial exploitation and the elaboration of derivative works.
Plagiarism and scientific fraud
The publication of work that infringes on intellectual property rights is the sole responsibility of the authors, including any conflicts that may occur regarding infringement of copyright. This includes, most importantly, conflicts related to the commission of plagiarism and/or scientific fraud.
Practices constituting scientific plagiarism are as follows:
1. Presenting the work of others as your own.
2. Adopting words or ideas from other authors without due recognition.
3. Not using quotation marks or another distinctive format to distinguish literal quotations.
4. Giving incorrect information about the true source of a citation.
5. The paraphrasing of a source without mentioning the source.
6. Excessive paraphrasing, even if the source is mentioned.
Practices constituting scientific fraud are as follows:
1. Fabrication, falsification or omission of data and plagiarism.
2. Duplicate publication.
3. Conflicts of authorship.
Warning
Any breach of these Rules shall constitute a ground for rejection of the manuscript submitted.
